User talk:Periyava Sharanam
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Periyava Sharanam! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 17:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
[edit]
An article you recently created, Sri Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 14:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
You were clearly told, above, that that article is NOT ready for article space, but moved it back despite this. Please do NOT move it back to article space - Arjayay (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Draft:Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. - Arjayay (talk) 22:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati.
Please STOP moving that draft to article space, as its references are unacceptable - Arjayay (talk) 10:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please read and follow Help:Referencing for beginners. Please also avoid using honorifics and random bold - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The page Sri Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:
Redirect to itself
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati
[edit] Hello, Periyava Sharanam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati
[edit]
Hello, Periyava Sharanam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarvajnatmanendra Saraswati".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kanchi Sri Jayendra Saraswathi Shankaracharya Swamigal, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. That was an undiscussed page-move, to an inappropriate title: we don't use WP:HONORIFICS in titles. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 19:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC) Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 19:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 19:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 08:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Request for Page Move: Kanchi Sri Jayendra Saraswathi Shankaracharya Swamigal
[edit]Dear fellow editors,
I would like to propose renaming Jayendra Saraswathi this article to **Kanchi Sri Jayendra Saraswathi Shankaracharya Swamigal**. I believe this title better reflects the full name and honorifics that are traditionally associated with the revered spiritual leader, in line with how he is addressed accoriding to Hindu Tradition and by the devotees of Kamakoti Peetham.
### Reasons for the proposed move:
1. **Accuracy and Respect for Title**: The proposed title includes the full honorific “Sri” and “Shankaracharya Swamigal,” which are important components of how he is formally referred to, especially in religious and cultural contexts. This better aligns with the significance of his role as the 69th Shankaracharya of the Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham.
2. **Devotees Beliefs**: This is particularly important in the context of his spiritual and cultural stature.
3. **Clarity and Specificity**: The new title clearly identifies his role as the **Shankaracharya** of the Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, distinguishing him from other prominent figures with similar names, thereby avoiding confusion.
I would appreciate the community’s feedback on this suggestion. If there is consensus, I request that the page be moved to reflect the full title.
Thank you for your consideration.
Best regards,
Periyava Sharanam Periyava Sharanam (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Request for Unblock
[edit]Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I am writing to respectfully request the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, Periyava Sharanam. I understand that my account was blocked, and I sincerely apologize if my actions unintentionally violated Wikipedia’s guidelines. I value the mission and community of Wikipedia and am eager to continue contributing in a constructive manner.
Reasons for the unblock request:
Understanding the Issue: I now understand the reason for the block, which I believe was related to "inappropriate page moves. I acknowledge the importance of following Wikipedia’s policies, and I assure you that I will avoid making the same mistake in the future.
Commitment to Guidelines: I have taken the time to carefully review Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly the policies related to [Wikipedia:Page mover"]. I am now more aware of the expectations and will adhere strictly to these rules going forward.
Positive Intentions: My intention has always been to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. I believe that I can offer valuable contributions in areas such as Hinduism and Indian Culture . I would very much appreciate the opportunity to continue helping expand and improve Wikipedia’s content.
Assurance of Constructive Editing: If unblocked, I promise to engage constructively, seek consensus, and collaborate with other editors before making any major edits or decisions. I will ensure that my contributions are in line with Wikipedia’s standards and will seek guidance from experienced editors whenever necessary.
I sincerely hope you will consider this request and allow me the opportunity to demonstrate that I can be a responsible and productive member of the community. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Periyava Sharanam
Periyava Sharanam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
unintentionally violated Wikipedia’s guidelines Periyava Sharanam (talk) 15:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I take your statement above to be the unblock request(it should be placed within the template as you did with "unintentionally violated..."). That statement was written by an AI(73% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you. Please write your request in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 20:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Appeal for my user account to get Unblocked
[edit]Appeal for Unblock Account Periyava Sharanam Clearing an autoblock
Due to the nature of the block applied, we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details, there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:
- If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
- Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
- If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
- Try to edit the Sandbox.
- If you are able to edit the sandbox, you are not blocked from editing. Either the autoblock on your IP address has already expired, or you weren't blocked in the first place. Either way, you can resume editing.
- If you are still blocked, follow the directions below:
- Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Unblock request" section.
- Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page, and click save.
- If you cannot edit your own talk page, use the Unblock Ticket Request System to make your request.
)
Periyava Sharanam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to you to have a reconsideration of a block on my account, Periyava Sharanam. I realize the actions that led me to get blocked and will take this opportunity to correct the wrong and ensure mistakes like this will not repeat themselves again.
I understand that the page I had moved was the reason for my account block," "I unintentionally violated the editing policies as i felt that the page name was not appropriate for an Hindu Saint who belonged to revered peetham ,I am deeply sorry for action which i made that this may have caused. NEVER has it been in my intention to work against what Wikipedia stands for-neutrality, verifiability, community guidelines.".
I now have a better understanding as to what went wrong. I have studied the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Page_mover and therefore am fully committed to strictly adhering to them in the future.
I shall always keep a place in my heart for Wikipedia, this fount of free knowledge, since I believe in this community's spirit of collaboration that drives it to make progress. I look forward to my contributions here being constructive and responsible, ensuring all my future edits meet the standards of Wikipedia. I humbly ask for the opportunity to demonstrate my intent to uphold the principles of this community, which shall be even more determined.
Reconsider my block and unblock my account. Promise to be vigilant and take full responsibility for my future behavior according to Wikipedia's rules and the community.
I thank you a lot for taking the time to consider this. You are one of those dedicated souls that keep Wikipedia true to itself, with a sense of propriety.
Best, Aravind Kumar Periyava Sharanam
Decline reason:
While this appeal is heartfelt, the text of Wikipedia:Page mover is of minimal relevance to the edits that led to you being blocked. That you cite it centrally in this and prior unblock requests suggests that you do not in fact understand what led to your block or what is written on that page, and in fact reflects a significant failure of reading comprehension to such a degree that I can't envision you contributing constructively to English Wikipedia regardless of good intent. signed, Rosguill talk 14:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.