User talk:PepeBonus/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

June 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for WP:HOUNDING. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

@Ad Orientem: This editor is still finding reasons to edit pages after me. I just looked at my contributions to find two pages I just edited I no longer have the current edit on. Three minutes after I edit an article that he hasn't edited in two+ days, he makes an edit. This chart updated 12 hours ago, and PepeBonus waits until after I edit it to update other things on it despite the fact it looks like he has been editing for the past 8 hours. I don't understand what PepeBonus's deal is, but I'm incredibly sick of it. Ss112 16:51, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry again for my mistake. I do not want to take your general editing but if you don't like it and make you feel bad, i will edit it without waiting for you. PepeBonus (talk) 16:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

I don't 100% understand but if that means you will stop finding reasons to edit articles I've just edited after me unless you're adding a chart that you regularly add, great. Ss112 17:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

PepeBonus Do not follow other editors around on the project. This has been explained to you multiple times, and you have even been blocked for it. I don't enjoy blocking editors, especially if I think they are honestly trying to help. But this is not allowed and yet you keep doing it. If you continue, you are likely going to get blocked again. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

OK, I understand. PepeBonus (talk) 17:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Like -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Standard covers before digital editions cover／general advice

Hi! So, I already explained this to you here and on Talk:Mephisto (song); I took your not replying as a nod and moved on, but it seems you are still stuck on it as you used the same argument, here and here. I have explained it before, but i have yet again explained it at Talk:Idol (Yoasobi song). Please, if you have a doubt regarding this, say so. I will not know unless you say it. If you have a doubt or disagreement over this—discuss it. I'll not be explaining this again after this, and certainly will not entertain any of your future edits based on this argument. Your latest reply on the article's talk page is still partially bordering on this. Can you please clarify whether you agree with it or not? Where do you stand? Lunar-akaunto／talk 08:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Secondly, cover saga aside, you have literally manually added back the upper-alpha values for footnotes here. I only ever removed them because i did not see any practical use of them here, and the default markup for the {{efn}} template is lower-alpha. It unnecessarily increases page size and does not even look visually any better. You have also reverted the closing line break "<br/>", which i only did to bring the article more in line with H:BR.

I'll just let them be because i dislike edit wars and because i left my fiddling fashion with these parameters long ago. More than that, I respect your preference here, but i would politely point out that you shouldn't be doing this when you yourself are tinkering with existing styles, or rather, default/completely acceptable styles. You do this often; leave the other places you do this at; you most recently did it in the articles i created. Mind you, these were all deliberate choices from my end, but this is where you unnecessarily replaced completely valid references, removed {{start date|}}, which is the default method to enter dates (Template:Infobox_song#Code), mushed up the external music video in one line, changed wording like "by label" to "through label", changed access dates from YYYY-MM-DD (which is a completely acceptable format). And may i ask you in what way 2024-07-05 is the same as July 8, 2024?! There are many other things you did, and if i start writing, this will become an essay. I completely bit down on all of that and just thanked you (1/2/3/4) that day and moved on instead. But what do you do? Revert, change, change! I did not say it at the time, but you did this at SPECIALZ too; I added the missing track listings, and what did you do? You change a completely consistent and acceptable style here, claiming to "fix" it. Have you read MOS:STYLERETAIN? If not, please do.—"When either of two styles is acceptable it is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change." Lunar-akaunto／talk 08:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi PepeBonus Please don't edit war or continue to add/remove material after being challenged. In such situations you need to discuss the content dispute on the article talk and seek WP:CONSENSUS. See WP:BRD. Failing to abide by this rule can be seen as disruptive. Thank you for your contributions to the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Redirections first, articles second

Hello PepeBonus,

It has come to my attention that you have been redirecting most of your articles (e.g 1, 2, 3}. Is it possible to know the reason for this?

Best Regards,

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I did not create these articles' redirect pages, so can you describe more? PepeBonus (talk) 15:12, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

@PepeBonus: For the first one, you redircted the article. Almost a month later, you created the article. For the second one, you redirected and created the article hours each of each other. The third one, you redirected the article. Then, created the article almost a month later.

I just want to know what is the reason behind redirecting the articles first, then creating the articles later.

Best Regards,

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 23:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh! I see. I created a redirect first when the title of something has announced and created article later when I have enough information or references. PepeBonus (talk) 04:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

@PepeBonus: That ok! I'll recommend is that you don't redirect articles or you put them to articles for creation. Of course, you don't have to follow this.

Best Regards, KjjjKjjj (talk) 11:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)