User talk:Penny Shaw

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to William Bell (artist) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: William Bell (artist) was changed by Penny Shaw (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877273 on 2021-03-30T20:46:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Penny Shaw, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Penny Shaw! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite) (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite)

Hello, Penny Shaw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite)

Hello, Penny Shaw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Thomas Collingwood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite) (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please, add links to the sources, it will be difficult to review this submission if we can't access the cited sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite) has been accepted

Thomas Collingwood (Jacobite), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on your article!

Hello Penny Shaw, I saw that your article on Thomas Collingwood was recently accepted. Congrats! I also saw that you removed material that couldn't be easily reviewed. I wanted to reiterate that offline sources are absolutely permitted in Wikipedia and you should not feel obliged to remove sourced material just because the sources are not available online. See WP:OFFLINE for more info. Thanks for your contributions and happy editing! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]