User talk:PenangLion/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

I-Santorini moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, I-Santorini, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Dato' Onn Tower moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dato' Onn Tower, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

DBKL Tower moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, DBKL Tower, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: I-Santorini (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I-Santorini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:I-Santorini, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, PenangLion! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tunku Abdul Rahman series

Template:Tunku Abdul Rahman series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 21:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for elaborating

Sorry if I came across as harsh earlier. Just a bit fed up with the overall nomination process, nothing personal. If I understand your actually heavy followup, "something dramatic" to you would look like the Capitol Hill riot. Presuming I'm right, which aspect of that was the most dramatic in your estimation: the forced entry into a restricted/sacrosanct area, the "Hang Mike Pence" slogan, the mock gallows, the horned berserker, the police brawl, Ashli Babbitt's shooting, Brian Sicknick's stroke, the delay in formal election certification, Donald Trump's involvement or something else?

To answer your questions, I think the use of heavy and mid-sized trucks in zones not preapproved for government-tolerated protest sets this apart from other brief and common afternoon pickets against the COVID rules. More like the Indian farmer blockades than typical antimask rabble. That these cost the opposition a billion or more dollars, triggered a broader emergency than the virus itself, received support from many in the police, military and foreign audience, resulted in Ottawa's top cop bailing , featured hot tubs and were exceptionally physically peaceful also helps. Did they "threaten democracy" in Canada? Hard for me to say, depends what that phrase means to you.

Anyway, keep healthy and stay strong, however you choose to help "combat the pandemic". It ain't easy, we can probably agree. Cheers to clear honest communication? InedibleHulk (talk) 00:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Apologies for my comments earlier, it got pretty heated. You have no need to apologize to me. You have solid points, but I think I have counter-points to reflect how you believe. It's fine. Since the discussion has ended, I think we shall move on. Since the protests are almost over (they have reached a consensus and have decided to start dismantle their own blockades), I think the entire protest is going to be over within a day or two. Still, you have your own grounds, I have my own. It's nothing personal. Again, have a nice day, and I would hope we would work more to make Wikipedia a better place. Cheers, PenangLion (talk) 03:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

That's the thing, though, I was born with the need to apologize. It's not just a gimmick up here, brother, many of us are the reason the real Canadian stereotype exists at all. I'm also hardwired to politely decline your gracious offer of forgiveness and counter that you have "no worries, bud!" You Chinese Malaysians, meaning no disrespect, just have your own ways, and I'm sure each Chinese Malaysian has his or her own take on what that cultural collective spirit even is. Are you going to watch the good old hockey game from Beijing today? Have you ever watched (ice) hockey? If anything's liable to spark a right bloody row during this stalled border movement, it's the result of a big final horn, win or lose! I forget if we posted the 2011 Vancouver Stanley Cup riot or not. In any case, all good, heat is only human. We'll agree on something else down the road, I'm sure, whatever the theme. Au revoir! InedibleHulk (talk) 03:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

P.S. Tonight's edition of The National (our most mainstream news show) featured a fully vaccinated Chinese-Canadian marching alongside the likely truckstop beardos with a Gadsden flag, not against some perceived creep of British colonial forces but this notion that Canada might become the New Russia. The scope is indeed unclear. In other news, a woman called Sarah Nurse is the new all-time single-tournament Olympic point-scorer, I'd honk quietly once in support of that frontline worker, eh? InedibleHulk (talk) 04:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Interesting. Thanks for sharing the fact. PenangLion (talk) 04:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Update: She scored again while I was typing that! Canada rules, 2-0. Forgot how time zones work. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Rather than wear out my welcome with unsolicited goal alerts, I'll just leave this magic newspaper on your desk, and casually fly out of the window, whistling... InedibleHulk (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! PenangLion (talk) 05:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

An invitation from WikiProject Malaysia

Hey Chongkian! Thanks for your invitation! But I'm already in the project for quite some time now! (not sure if you've already forgotten my presence) But thanks! It's my honour. Cheers, PenangLion (talk) 07:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Apologies about the image on the Ukraine crisis

Sorry I removed your image, it wasn't intentional, I was working on grammar in the same section and the software must have fought I was trying to go back to an earlier version of the article.--Llewee (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

It's fine. No need to worry! Cheers, PenangLion (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Pls read

this carefully: Sequence of tenses#English and desist from making ungrammatical edits.Axxxion (talk) 12:41, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Also, your penchant for making ginormous quotes from media texts inserted in refs is usually uncalled for. Such quotes only make sense when the source contains a lengthy text and it is time-consuming to find an appropriate place therein. Do not use long dot lines for elisions in quotes: in English such omissions are usually denoted by "[...]" (just three dots).Axxxion (talk) 13:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Hey, Axxxion. I checked on the additions, and I followed what the source came. I can confirm the grammar is mostly correct, thank you for the advices on references but I don't think simply chopping everything would make real sense. If it's from multiple outlets then please help add more references instead of putting 2, and claim its multiple. I'm still working on it, so please, give more time. PenangLion (talk) 13:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

And, again, if it does not belong to the section, then move to the appropriate section rather than deleting everything and forcing everyone to rewrite it again. PenangLion (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Batu Pahat Stadium

The article Batu Pahat Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 04:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

added a link pointing to CBC

Siege of Chernihiv

added a link pointing to ABC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for your efforts

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for being the top contributor to an article related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you. PenangLion (talk) 02:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from ms:Keranda 152 into Draft:Keranda 152. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@DanCherek Oh about this, apologies. I copied the text for a basis for my further edits. Expect it to be extensively changed in the coming days. Thank you for reminding. Cheers, PenangLion (talk) 12:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for your work on it and good luck! DanCherek (talk) 12:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Reorganisation loan affair has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Reorganisation loan affair. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 12:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply :) Cheers, PenangLion (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 8 Conlay

The article 8 Conlay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 03:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dato' Onn Tower

Hello, PenangLion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dato' Onn Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:DBKL Tower

Hello, PenangLion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DBKL Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reorganisation loan affair has been accepted

Reorganisation loan affair, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 20:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:I-Santorini

Hello, PenangLion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I-Santorini, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PenangLion

Thank you for creating Reorganisation loan affair.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:33, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your welcome, and thanks for the curation! Cheers, PenangLion (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)