User talk:Pejman47/Archive3

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party is now active, and your input is requested. Further information is available at the Mediation location, Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Kind regards,
Anthøny 16:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Post reporter here. Doing an article on Wiki. Wwould like to speak to uers who wre involved in the MA mediation. Is there a way to rach you ASAP? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teamsport86 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering, How many typos you have made in only two sentences! Are you sure that you are a journalist for an English-speaking newspaper? :)--Pejman47 (talk) 13:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Saddam rumsfeld.jpg

Since it looks like this image is going to be kept, perhaps it should be put back in the articles it was in? I don't know what they are so I can't figure out where to put it. -Nard 00:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naming issue

Hi Pejman. Can you take a look at Talk:Special Operation 85: Hostage Rescue#Organization name issue? The Behnam 18:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will look in to it, take care. --Pejman47 21:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That was a quick response. Thanks a lot! I wasn't quite sure if this game was made by high school students (since only one source used "high school") but your remark about the two words for "student" clears that up. The Behnam 18:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome, but it is not made by high school students, it is made by an organizations which works with them. --Pejman47 20:00, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, well, I'm not quite sure what that entails, but thanks anyway. The Behnam 06:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MA mediation

Sorry, but I have been, and still am, up to my eyeballs in work and sinking fast , so I have not been able to address your statement with the deliberation it requires. The mediator has blanked the page in prep for the next stage anyway, so I'm sure we will have a chance to continue our discussion soon. Welcome back, BTW. -- Avi 14:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the kind words. I hope you also can come back to wiki with full strength. --Pejman47 18:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewasher

[1] It seems that we have a whitewashing IP to keep an eye upon. The Behnam 17:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tashakkur

دوست عزیز از مدالی که دادید سپاسگزارم. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali doostzadeh (talk • contribs) 21:26, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 Closed

The above named arbitration case in which you were named as a party has closed. The remedy is as follows: The remedies of revert limitations (formerly revert parole), including the limitation of 1 revert per week, civility supervision (formerly civility parole) and supervised editing (formerly probation) that were put in place at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan shall apply to any editor who edits articles which relate to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility. Before any penalty is applied, a warning placed on the editor's user talk page by an administrator shall serve as notice to the user that these remedies apply to them.

You may view the full case decisions here.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 00:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi Pejman. Can you help out with a possible OR issue at Talk:Mohammad Reza Pahlavi#Deletion of biased/improperly sourced section? There are some Persian language sources that cannot be verified, and your opinion on the matter would also be good to have. Hope to hear from you. The Behnam 18:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

‌ I will look in to it.--Pejman47 11:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

calling that event "not coupe" is a OR opposed to all the RS present and deletion of that paragraph is justified. The only dispute that I know about that event is whether it was a "good" or "bad" event in Iran's history.--Pejman47 21:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Bell

Hi! I just wanted to explain why I undid your edit to Catherine Bell. While the biography section does say that her father is Scottish and mother Iranian, she was born in London, which makes her British born. Enuja (talk) 00:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you 're right, but mine is true too. As I guess she has citizenship of both U.S. and Britain. I changed it a little to represent both of them (first mentioning her mixed ethnicity and then her double nationality).--Pejman47 16:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the medal.

Dear Pejman,

I am honored to have the medal. You made my day. Thanks :) Persian Magi 00:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MA page

Look at the history on August 9; this WAS the stable version. -- Avi 19:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi Pejman. Can you please take a look at references 18 and 19 in Ali Montazeri article? I'm wondering if they directly support the claim, if they are proper weight, and I also want to know some basic information so that I can stylistically improve the reference itself (like I did for the other references). Thanks. The Behnam 17:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Those sources were quotes from Rafsanjani and only suggest that Ayatollah Golpaygani had less than third of the votes, but doesn't give any "interpretation" of it or anything else.

about your request about the sources: one of them has a page in here: Radio Farda and the other is a news website operating from Tehran. --Pejman47 15:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsupported Opinions

Dear Mr. Pejman: Welcome to Wikipedia yourself. Boastful comments, such as you re-instated are not NPOV, as defined by Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. "Warnings" have no place in polite discussion. --Zeamays 07:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

Thank you for your message.

However, I have lost interest in defending this nation after they picked a person to lead their experts assembly.

best--Gerash 77 18:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should always defend your land, regardless of "anything". But anyway I respect your decision to leave the WP. I also toned down your message. take care. --Pejman47 18:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your help over these months...

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for fighting vandalism and helping with Persian translations. Many thanks! The Behnam 00:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Behnam 00:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, cheers. --Pejman47 12:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: MA mediation

recently, when I was reading some article in mainstream media, I noticed that they "sometimes" do add some explanations after or before the "wiped of the map" phrase to alert the reader that the phrase may be result of a mistranslation. for example "politically wiped off the map though he insists that can be accomplished without violence. CNN

the inclusion of some explanation like above was one of the outstanding issues that resulted in edit-wars in past. I have a question: can I add a short explanation to the lead about this? (or even a link to the explanation) can you please re-initiate this topic in mediation.--Pejman47 19:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You'd be best to initiate it yourself on the RfM page, as it's your own idea :) Daniel 13:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately a task with a strict deadline have been assigned to me; and I will busy till this weekend. I will initiate it on Friday. I hope this time we can reach a compromise. --Pejman47 18:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chionites

Please, see my comment on the talk page. If you have any objection, please let me know. Regards. E104421 00:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MA mediation

Hello, Pejman.

I have e-mailed Daniel asking for a ruling, either way, as to the properness of edits to the lead vis-à-vis the issues under mediation. I hope he replies soon. -- Avi 02:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing and removing text reffering to highy valid sources

I have a question for you, why are always deleting my contributions to the article regarding Jundallah? The last time you deleted/edited the text to its original form, you gave an obscure reason saying that the references where unreliable and affiliated. Mate, I don't know what your defenition of reliability is when the majority of my references where from Amnesty International and other internationally acknoledged sources, whereas your sources are mainly Iranian state run newspapers, which makes your text very subjective (pro Iranian regime propaganda), and your self seem as a spokesman for this regime. . . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morara (talk • contribs) 21:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian peoples

I'll see what I can do.Tombseye 16:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MA mediation

Hi, Pejman.

No, sorry, it must have gotten lost among other messages. I will hopefully look at your proposal tonight or tomorrow and reply after I have read it. Thank you for once again bringing it to my attention. -- Avi 19:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I responded on the talk. Is that the proposal to which you were referring? Thanks! -- Avi 14:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MA

I'm sorry, but I spend much more time contemplating the suggestions and my responses to this mediation than I do to simple vandalism reversions and citation updates, as this article so richly deserves. As such, it does take more time, and I need larger bocks of time to answer this than I do the five minutes or so I have when I'm running simulations. I'm sorry that it is going too slowly for you, but as mediator Daniel said: "Mediation is a slow process".

I could snap off answers quickly with less thought for both the subject and the participants, but what would that solve? -- Avi 21:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ball is in your court, by-the-by, on the mediation page. I responded there yesterday. -- Avi 20:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Hello friends,

can someone also add the Kart Maliks (Kartids). they ruled and kept Khorasan and eevn modern Peshawar Valley independent from Mongols and Ilkhanats. They ruled from 1231-1389 till the Timurids. They were local ruler from Herat, Bamyan, Kabul, Badakhshan, north Kandahar and Ghazna..so a very large house..

--Aspandyar Agha 17:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

the Kart Maliks were based mainly in Herat but they were also from other part of modern Afghanistan and yesterdays persian Khorasan. They claimed themself as descends of the Ghurids. When the Il-Khanatas took the power of the whole iranian plateau they accpeted them as their neighbours so they were able to rule self in Khorasan. Just Samarkand and Bukhara and maybe Merv was under the il-Khanatas while the mst of the plateau were under their own hands, even modern Pakistan.

Generally we can say they were a sub-ordinated dynasty..but an indenpendent one unlike other dynasties or nations. I just don´t know who to deal with both because both dynasties were ruling in Greater Iran..--Aspandyar Agha 14:55, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy

It is considered courteous to inform someone should you open a WP:ANI discussion about them. For example, User talk:Omegatron#Courtesy notice and User talk:Omegatron#Courtesy notice 2. Please read the introduction to WP:ANI and remember that inter-editor courtesy and civility are as much polices as any other in wikipedia. Thank you. -- Avi 20:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not that you violated civility, per se, although I would request you read my response and clarify what you meant by WP:COI, but that being pro-active and realizing that dispute resolution techniques do not necessarily mean that you have it "out" for an editor, but that you are requesting help with a situation, goes a long way in ensuring that even editors who have strong disagreements, can do so respectfully. -- Avi 20:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I said that based on our previous interactions, I was pretty sure that was not what you meant; but there was no logical explanation other than a misunderstanding of [{WP:COI]]. Which was correct, you meant use of admin privileges, which is not COI. But restoring a locked article under mediation to maintain stability is not considered a misuse. If anything, the unilateral UNLOCK was the misuse. Further, it has been locked for 20 days now, a far cry from six months. Hyperbole does not help anyone. -- Avi 20:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider that i have had 2 incidents of avi when has used his tools in my view in conflict of interest, i would appreciate if someone can recall his sysop status through a community consensus discussion.--יודל 13:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced template

In the article Achaemenid Empire the History of Greater Iran template was placed in the list of Achaemenid kings and leaders. That template is a navigation aid to broader history. In that location it is misplaced. I couldn't find a place in the Achaemenid Empire article where it would both fit and be useful. --Bejnar 21:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Disputed"

Hi. I have not added it because there has been more discussion on the mediation page regarding that particular construction, some people opposing it for various reasons. If I were to add it notwithstanding the opposition, even if I personally think it is the best construction, I would be as guilty as anyone in contributing to the page destabilization, something I am working very hard to prevent. We need to achieve a consensus on the mediation page through discussion and then we can add it. The page has been somewhat quiet recently, unfortunately. -- Avi 14:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah

There was a consensus about what was written in the article. Please don't change it without discussion on the talk page.(Sa.vakilian)--Seyyed(t-c) 02:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your manner will lead to an editorial war. Please discuss in the talk page instead of reverting the editions. Thanks.--Seyyed(t-c) 02:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One should always use reliable sources, usually the consensus is made about what part(s) of them are going to be on the lead. StandWithUs website is not a source and can not be used in any article.--Pejman47 19:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stand with us especially needs to be kept out because there are other options, with the same information we can use that are less biased. I am strongly against using any propaganda sites on wikipedia. Cheers!--SJP 07:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah

On the Hezbollah I offered a suggestion on what we should do. I believe the suggestion to be reasonable. See you there:)--SJP 00:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poll

Hello. I have decided to start a poll to get a better idea of what the consensus is on the hezbollah article. The poll is on the Hezbollah articles talk page. Thought you might want to know so you could include yourself in it. Cheers!--I wish you a happy Veterans Day 22:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iran article

Some of my edits which you undid were legitimate and to the benefit of the article and each one comes with an explanation. For instance in the culture section I removed all non-NPOV text which i thought was necessary because it had a banner above it! If you had actually looked at my editsmost of them needed doing. Two of the references had no text. Why did you restore them? In some cases I rephrased some sentences. I seriously advise you to study edits before redoing themArdeshire Babakan 19:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iran military task force

Salam, What's your idea about making a task force for Iran military task force. Please add your idea here. Thanks--Seyyed(t-c) 05:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iran article

I noticed that you undid one of my edits on the Iranian culture section. I thought this was a valid edit seeing that the paragraph only talked about the influences of Iranian culture and didn't contribute to the readers knowledge of Iranian culture. The only way to keep the sentence in the culture section is to actually mention some of the influences with sources. The fact that it is sourced is irrelevant. Until any influences are mentioned with references I will make sure that the text is deleted from the article. Thank you for your time.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 12:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As we disagree so strongly on the matter I will keep the text in and start a discussion on the talk page. After a month or two we will conclude on the issue; or we could actually mention some of these influences so the reader has a greater understanding of our culture rather than just it's influences. The problem I have with the paragraph is that it is advertisement. you might know that we recently had a problem with advertisement on the Culture section but thankfully the issue was solved by removing the controversial parts of the text. I just don't want the culture section to get that bad again. I hope you will agree.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian peoples

Your this revert actually restored the wrong version of User:Moorudd (and his various 85.xxx. IPs [2]) who has already vandalized many other articles, such as Timurid dynasty and Babur, violating WP:POINT. He had altered the genetic section by pruposely misinterpreting a scientific source, claiming that Iranian peoples are closer related to (what he interprets as) Turkic peoples than to their linguistic relatives in the Indian Subcontinent. However, that is not a proof for supposed "Turkic roots" of the Iranian peoples, but actually confirms other genetic tests which reveal that most Iranian peoples belong to West Eurasian populations. That's because the population of Anatolia is not Turkic (in terms of genetics) but is (like the Iranian peoples) related to other West Eurasian populations. Once the articles is unblocked, you should correct that. Thank you.

on what you have provided me [3], I see only reshuffling the text and no change of the context. could you please more specifically note the difference. Please copy and paste the difference sentences, so I can review it. Regards. --Pejman47 (talk) 17:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The IP (User:Moorudd) has underlined certain passages in the quote, trying to divert the attention of the reader and giving the wrong impression that "Iranian peoples are Turks". In fact, that's what he has been promoting in various articles. There is no need to underline anything in quote. Besides that, Prof. Cavalli-Sforza's quote needs to be on top because he is the most respected and most important scientist in this field.

Close genetic similarities between the peoples of the Iranian Plateau and Anatolia are not surprising. But claiming that this proves some kind of "Turkish origin" for the Iranian peoples, as the notorious user is trying to say, is totally wrong. "West Eurasian" means that both, Iranian peoples and the population of Anatolia, have a common ancestor along with many people from Europe. But that ancestor was not "Turkic" (= East Asian). It's rather the other way around: the modern-day Turks are predominantly descendants of Iranian and other West Eurasian people while their language is Turkic (= East Asian). see this: [4]

Fan Translations

Please read about how I feel about these, and if you disagree please state your reasons. [5] Newspaper98 (talk) 23:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RV to Iran Air Flight 655

Please explain how your edit to the article "Iran Air Flight 655" relates to the following:

1. WP:NPOV - absolute and non-negotiable
2. Pertains to the article

If, somehow, you can make a case for this edit, could you PLEASE correct the blatant grammatical errors?
--Borisborf (talk) 22:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iran article

I think you haven't noticed that the Iran article is still over 100kB long and everyone agrees that this is not a suitable size for this article. If you think this article is fine as it is then I suggest that you nominate it for an FA review; But I think it is obvious that this article is not to the standard of a featured article. I also wish to tell you that my edits are not random and that I study each section in great detail and I write a very detailed edit summary on most of my edits. The history section of this article is roughly 1/3 of the article and it is logical that this section should be the starting point for our edits. All that stands in our way of making Iran an FA is a large history section and an unstructured paragraph or two in other parts of the article. I do not want to make the history section too small but a history section the size of the Turkish history section is suitable considering the amount of history iran has and the pride that Iranians (including me) have when it comes to history. Since i started my editing "Crusade" the article has been at it's smallest for over 1000 edits. I hope u see things the way I do and i hope that we can agree on the matter.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 14:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Massoud Rajavi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Massoud Rajavi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

I am going to ask you this one time to refrain from commenting like you did here. It is considered a personal attack and uncivil. I have endeavored to be polite with you, and I expect the same sort of consideration. You really don't want to find out how harsh I can be with you and your edits. I understand that the topic is frustrating to you, but you need to take a deep breath and not attack editors who can editorially respond far better than you can. Please be polite. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 21:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iran FA

Hi, Sorry I didn't reply. I went on holiday for a week and really enjoyed myself.

About the Iran page, I think the fact that making Iran an FA is of top importance to WikiProject Iran should be considered. Most of the text is factually accurate but the article shouldn't get too big or too detailed. The coverage should be broad and general. I felt that if I discussed every single change progress would come slowly and I think radical change is the only way forward. Please reply as soon as possible.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 22:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you already know the whole point of an article on Wikipedia is to cover a subject as best as possible and the articles are rated depending on how well they do this. I will also remind you that the FA articles are the best articles on Wikipedia. I think that by telling me that becoming an FA is not important U hope to discourage me from doing anything drastic; But don't worry. I suggest that we nominate the Iran page for FA and then take any advice given into account and decide on what we should do. About the USA page, well...that's why it's not an FA! But I won't do anything drastic until we have decided on what we should do with the article. Do U agree with my suggestion?Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 14:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iran cheetah pic

I am not sure if the cheetah pic was decided upon by using a pole but if it was then I am sorry. If it wasn't I would like to say that the Canada page (which is an FA) has a satellite image of Canada. Also the satellite picture is not used in any other article and it would be a waste not to use this splendid pic. There is nowhere in that section where it talks about Iran's wildlife.

I will start a new pole on the discussion page. I hope you enjoyed your wikibreak.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 13:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to thank you for your advice for your advice about the picture deletions. I was a bit hasty in deleting the images. I would also like to ask you why you undid the merging of the Geography section and the Administrative divisions, and you didn't say why on the talk page where I had discussed this. I also noticed that whenever you want to undo one of my edits you end up undoing a whole bunch of edits. Please stop these kinds of edits as they are de constructive.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geography and the Administrative divisions can be two very different things, I reverted it because your edits seemed "fundamental" and needed consensus in talk page. If in future you edit any thing major in that article please put a notice in talk page before that. Cheers, --Pejman47 (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

by the way what did you do in here [6]--Pejman47 (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again

Hello. It is becoming more obvious to me that we have some major disagreements over the Iran page and I hope that we can resolve all of them, but for now I will focus on these two. I will first say that the Shah picture serves more purposes than the old one. The old image only showed what he and Farah looked like, and also the dark background sets a dull mood on the section. The Second picture shows what he looked like, his close ties with America and has proper lighting. On the other hand My explanation of the replacement of the Ismail picture was a little vague. What I meant was that he was more important in modern Iran. He was the reason for the demise of Iran. He lost Afghanistan and gave advantages to westerners. He also ruled for longer. If someone more worthy ruled we would have had a border with China, the Taliban wouldn't exist, 9/11 wouldn't have happened, and america wouldn't have invaded (although these are speculations). Fath ali Shah only lost Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia. In future please do not question my knowledge of Iranian history as it is incredibly insulting. I have been studying Iran'shistory since I was 9/10, both in chool and out of it. I even read a 500 page book on the history of Iran.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you look on the talk page you would see that all of my image poles have received no or minimal responses which doesn't show the view of the majority. `sometimes I feel like I am wasting my time with the talk page. look at the responses to my most recent proposal. It seems that you have insulted my knowledge of Iranian history again. To confirm what I said I have a 2nd year of Dabirestan book in front of me with a clear map of Iran's lost territories during the Qajar era. I can see that Iran lost Turkmenistan and a border with the Aral sea to the Treaty of Akhal, half of Afghanistan to the British through the Paris treaty[7] and ⅓ of Pakistan to the Goldsmidt treaty,whilst as I said before Fath ali Shah only lost parts of north west Iran (Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia). Check the facts if you don't believe me!Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I "deleted" that text is because I replaced it with a sentence which I think says the same thing but with less words. I am now going to revert it.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK!! If you think naming the treaties is so important then keep them.BUT DON"T UNDO THE WHOLE EDIT! Just put back the names of the treaties. Thank you for not undoing my edit and discussing it. I hope that I can remove this small habit of mine too.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your attention, I added those treaties. --Pejman47 (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Undercover (game)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Undercover (game), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Undercover (game) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Undercover (game), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hotel-Room-video.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hotel-Room-video.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah

Hi there. Please read my comments at the talk page. The edit summary is not a good way to communicate. --mceder (u t c) 16:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Final_fantasy_IV_final_boss.JPG

I have tagged Image:Final_fantasy_IV_final_boss.JPG as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 03:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sepaas

		The Original Barnstar
		Pejman Jan, I award you this Barnstar for your excellent contributions to Iran related topics. Also your excellent protection of Wikipedia articles from vandalism. Nawruz Shomaa Piruz Baashad va Khodaavand o Ali Hamraahestaan! May you prosper and may God be with you. alidoostzadeh (talk) 03:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use talk pages for discussion

Re: this revert of yours. If you have questions or are otherwise incapable of reading sources, please use either article or user talk pages to communicate with other editors. Reverts are neither the appropriate method for expressing yourself, nor (as is also evident here) is it possible to adequately formulate questions using edit summaries. So, should you actually have questions, please post those questions in an appropriate place.
Please remember that with the exception of obvious vandalism, reverts are not normal editing practice. Instead of removing or reverting changes or additions you may not like, add to and enhance them while following the basic principle of improving an article. If you can't figure out how any part of an edit benefits an article ask for clarification on the article's or the editor's discussion page. Please don't forget that no one can read your mind, so even when you do revert, it is crucial that you inform people why you reverted. Thanks. -- Fullstop (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Final fantasy IV final boss.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Final fantasy IV final boss.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Adventure Island 3 ending.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Adventure Island 3 ending.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Service badge

I give you this service badge because of your continual efforts to improve Wikipedia. You are meant to give it to yourself but I thought it would be nice if I gave it to you. Good Luck.Ardeshire Babakan (talk) 18:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!--Pejman47 (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NeJad2.jpg

Why would this image be GFDL? Haukur (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

because of a note in the end of this page: [8] " .Using the materials of this site with mentioning the reference is free"--Pejman47 (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]