Hello, Ardeshire Babakan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Cf38 (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Demonapocalypse, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Blueboy9613:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Except the edits that you call it "relocating the texts", the others violate the previous consenus or are blatant deletion of sources. Even you delete captions of pictures without giving any reasons. Then you blindly reverted my edits as if you own the article. Please have a more mature attidue in dealing with other users. --Pejman47 (talk) 13:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The size of the article is not at all an important factor of FA status, the factual accuracy and full coverage of subject is the defining factors. And after all , I don't think that FA status is a big deal; If you know what I mean.
If you have any concerns about the accuracy of some of the claims in the article, please feel free and discuss it in its talk page. But removing the sources from the lead for "shortening the article" or changing the pictures without prior discussion is not appropriate, cheers. --Pejman47 (talk) 15:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see you around today. I hope, you didn't become disappointed from WP. If you feel that some sentences are redunant in that article, please list them in the talk page one by one. I am sure with the help of other users we can improve its quality.--Pejman47 (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
please refrain from any dramatic edit, please discuss any important change that you make in the article and try to make "everybody happy"; although I am sure it is hard.
By the way the article is already have GA status and I don't think FA is a big deal. And again as I said before the length of the article is not an important factor for the FA status. Besides that I do NOT think the size of article is now big, for example United States 'article is 150KB. --Pejman47 (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not change the pictures that we had consensus for them. Here: [2] both of what you said is wrong. There was a reason that the picture of Ismail I was selected to be in Iran's article, and I am afraid by saying that "Naser al-din was more important", you have shown that you have no clear understanding of Iran's history. Also, if loss of land is the factor for being included, it must be Fat′h Ali Shah Qajar. --Pejman47 (talk) 15:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
regardless of your reasoning, you should discuss your changes in the talk page and try to change the previous image consensus and then change them. Which I think you have not done it by now.
First, the highschool books are NOT reliable sources for history in any country!.
Ismaill is the founder of Safavid Dynasti, the main creator of what is current Iran. You are advised to read its wiki article, at least.
There was a consensus about some pictures of that article, unless you have a new one, regardless of your reasoning, you may not change them. You may invite the people that participated in the previous consensus (around 10 users) to rethink their previous choices. insisting on unilaterally changing the article to what you perceive is the better version is an insult to the participants of previous poll. Sincerely, --Pejman47 (talk) 21:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Iran. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Pejman47 (talk) 21:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for adding the Infobox to Persian Gulf. However, please do not move/remove/merge the page's sections and sub-sections without a clear consensus on talk page, as this is a sensitive topic which is under mediation at the moment. --Sia34 (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please be patient and build consensus on discussion page, and allow time for the mediation to colclude, before making any major changes.--Sia34 (talk) 23:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You were reverted multiple times. If it was a slight disagreement that could have easily been resolved, I would not have protected the page. Given the prior situation with the article, I felt it was best to err on the side of caution. However, it seems no discussion has taken place on the talk page, so I have now unprotected the page. Nishkid64 (talk)21:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Khubi? Do you have Gmail talk or any other messenger. If yes, can you please tell me what your ID is, I need to talk to you. --07fan (talk) 12:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments have been left at the FAC for Artaxerxes III of Persia. As a nominator, you should be revisiting that page frequently to make sure that any issues are addressed. Otherwise, the nomination may not be promoted. Karanacs (talk) 18:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I can retract my warning if it's in good faith. However, I can't retract the other user's warning. Just remember, if you're in that situation again, use the edit summary box. Also, move the page instead of blanking and copying. The move button is next to history. It makes it a lot easier to change the name.--LAAFan20:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Yeoman (farmer), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://brockmanofkent.net/Yeoman.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Yeoman (farmer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Toon0522:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Ardeshire. I've noticed your edits to the Iran page among others. Please create a sandbox under your username (possibly at User:Ardeshire Babakan/Iran), in order to not clog up recent changes and the page history, as you tend to make a very large number of edits every single time you develop an article. That way you can make as many as you want in your userspace, then transfer them into the page. Another solution is to use the preview button more. Thanks. Khoikhoi20:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why, but you seem to be under the impression that removing of content from pages, somehow improves the pages. From what I can see, you are very young and your historical knowledge is very limited. Therefore, I kindly ask you not to remove content from Iranian pages. If you feel a paragraph or a sentence is wrong, simply place a fact tag and wait for a source, instead of removing it.--Sina111 (talk) 20:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to let you know. Ths is also posted at your help desk request as well. When possible, try using more reliable sources such as books or journal articles. Websites are okay as long as they check out against RSN guidelines. Thanks for contributing! --Meldshal42?23:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Baradar, Sepasgozaram az djaize ke baram ferestadi. Khodam yek modati log in nakardebodam va aslan nadidebodamesh, ama alan didamesh va kheyli khoshhal shodam, dastet dard nakone va moafagh bashi to har kar ke mikoni dar zendegit, yadet nare ke be hishki djoz khod o khoda bedehkar nisti, so keep up the great work and "keep it real" ;-D and oh also happy ramadan and fasting Cyrus111 (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................[reply]
The page Second Persian conquest of Egypt appears to be copied from George Rawlinson's Ancient Egypt. Incorporation of significant elements of an author's work without providing adequate credit may constitute plagiarism. Directly copying sentences and paragraphs without noting the direct quotation is particularly problematic. Plagiarism is a serious lapse of academic ethics, and is not welcome at Wikipedia.
Finally, if you believe that you may have copied text into other pages without giving adequate credit to the original authors of the information, please identify those pages so that we can cooperate in making any necessary repairs. Thank you, and happy editing. Cnilep (talk) 02:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran at the 1998 FIFA World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ardeshire Babakan, your name has been removed from the less active members list at WikiProject Afghanistan/Members and moved to the former section of the members list. This is because you have not edited for over a year. If you become active again, feel free to move your name back to the active members list. Cheers, —Danre98(talk^contribs)17:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Artaxerxes III has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
