User talk:Peecee1978

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Peecee1978, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rklawton 18:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Tucker, Kellie Pickler

Re: Lisa Tucker, thanks for considering the need to redirect American Idol semi-finalists to the article for the season, but I think in her case, she is notable enough to merit an article. In addition to being an AI contestant, she was a Star Search finalist and had a role in the Lion King stage production. The same would go for Becky O'Donohue; AI semi-finalist, plus Fear Factor contestant, plus pictorial in Maxim magazine together merit her an article in my view. But by all means, please help me keep the other semi-finalists who have no other achievements redirected. Thanks, Postdlf 03:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to mimic Postdlfs comments in terms of Kellie Pickler. She has developed a huge following of fans and is often mentioned as a favorite to win, so it's a little early to delete her article. Please use the talk page before making a major change to a page. --Mercury1 21:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not repost articles which have been deleted

Please do not repost articles which have been deleted. Rklawton 18:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:B000FS9NEQ.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ V50690598 .jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:B000FS9NEQ.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ V50690598 .jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 08:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:B000HKDBWC.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ V40663211 .jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:B000HKDBWC.01. SS500 SCLZZZZZZZ V40663211 .jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Current-single-stub

Hi - I have just rolled back your change to the list of stub types. There is no "current-single-stub" template, neither has one been proposed for creation at WP:WSS/P (which is where new stub types are discussed. It is unlikely that such a stub type would be approved, either, since stubs tend to stay on articles until they are expanded, whereas the term "current" implies that the template would be changed to something different once the single was no longer current (making a lot of extra work for stub-sorters). Grutness...wha? 02:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glamour

First, you made the change with no explanation (not even an edit summary, which you should always give) or source; I would have reverted it on those grounds alone, but secondly, according to the article on the song, your change was inaccurate, as the song is by Prince. Thirdly, the MoS for dab pages says that entries should ideally have only one linked word or phrase. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zinedine Zidane

Please don't add rumours to Wikipedia. Thank you. - Dudesleeper · Talk 18:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Down/Kilo

Hi there! Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you added the line “Down AKA Kilo, a latino hiphop artist with the single "Lean Like A Cholo"” to the Down disambiguation page. I've removed that item. According to the Manual of Style for Disambiguation Pages, each item on the page should point to one (and only one) Wikipedia article. Since that line did not link to any article, it isn't really appropriate. I also did some brief web searching, and I'm concerned that the artist in question would fail to meet the Notability Guidelines for Music. There are too many musical artists in the world for Wikipedia to have an article on every single one of them. (Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.) If you think the artist in question would meet the notability guidelines, I suggest creating a new article, being sure to cite reliable sources. If the article passes muster, it should certainly be added to the disambiguation page. If a valid article cannot be created, it really doesn't belong on the dab page, either. If you need help with any of this, feel free to ask at the Help desk or my talk page. Cheers! —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 02:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Grillz.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Grillz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Laffy Taffy.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Laffy Taffy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Alan Grunblatt

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Alan Grunblatt, by UnitedStatesian, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Alan Grunblatt is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Alan Grunblatt, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Alan Grunblatt itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Premier League 2007-08, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you.

AfD nomination of Kafani

Kafani, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Kafani satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kafani and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Kafani during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eliz81 ^(talk)^(contribs) 09:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of DJ Felli Fel

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on DJ Felli Fel, by Stormbay (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because DJ Felli Fel seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting DJ Felli Fel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bad_Day_single.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bad_Day_single.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as C-Side, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Spryde 15:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boyfriend Girlfriend

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Boyfriend Girlfriend, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Spryde 15:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CS282039-01A-BIG.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CS282039-01A-BIG.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calabria

Please stop adding references to Ultra Records in the Calabria (song) article. It was not published by Ultra. It was licensed to Ultra, who released it as a CD-single. It was also licensed to Rise, Feel The Rhythm, Vendetta Records and Capitol Records, so nothing out of the ordinary there. --Pc13 (talk) 17:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Shawty Lo

A tag has been placed on Shawty Lo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Shawty Lo

An article that you have been involved in editing, Shawty Lo, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawty Lo. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patriots roster

Why are you moving Gemara Williams and Kyle Bissinger to the Patriots' active roster?►Chris Nelson^Holla! 17:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because they were activated on January 16. Peecee1978 (talk) 17:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, they were signed to the practice squad on January 16. They were previously free agents.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 17:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sean Paul Temperature.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sean Paul Temperature.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 10:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Snap music

An editor has nominated Snap music, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap music and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She's So Fly (I'm So High)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article She's So Fly (I'm So High), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of She's So Fly (I'm So High). tomasz. 22:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote No Air?

Who wrote No Air? The article says The Underdogs produced it. Did they also write it? Pls add it 2 the article. Thx. CassieSOUBRETTE (talk) 12:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Casely

Please quit linking Emotional (Casely song), as you did in this diff. The song isn't notable enough for its own page yet; furthermore, you're creating an unnecesssary red link in the process. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Is this notable enough? Peecee1978 (talk) 04:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not all charting songs need their own pages. I'd say wait until it hits Top 40 (if it does) to create a page on the song itself. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 16 @ War

I have nominated 16 @ War, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/16 @ War. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Damiens.rf 18:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get Silly

Note that here you are commenting on the talk page of a closed deletion discussion, which won't get much attention. If you think the page should be re-created, consider using a sub-page to do so in your user space, ask the closing admin (User:JForget) to userfy the deleted page, and expand based on that. I would also ask the closing admin to review your final version before moving it yourself, to indicate that they agree the page deals with the issues raised in the AFD discussion (failing WP:MUSIC, WP:N, WP:ITSA and the artist themselves failing to have a wikipedia page). Consider also that it may be better to create the page for V.I.C. and placing the information there instead, until the song obviously passes the guidelines. Of course, you'd have to be sure VIC also passes MUSIC, N and/or BIO. If you've new sources, be sure to include them in the sub-page. WLU (talk) 18:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you may want to consider deletion review as a way of determining if the page should be re-created. WLU (talk) 18:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Foolish (Shawty Lo song)

I have nominated Foolish (Shawty Lo song), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foolish (Shawty Lo song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Damiens.rf 23:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "You Got Me (One Block Radius song)"

A page you created, You Got Me (One Block Radius song), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. BigHairRef | Talk 02:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MLB Players

please dont redirect mlb players to there teams like you did with Reid Brignac and Nick Hundley, thats not how its done.--70.165.222.112 (talk) 15:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:1290276 170x170.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:1290276 170x170.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bad Girlfriend

A tag has been placed on Bad Girlfriend requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 09:16, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Kevin Rudolf

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kevin Rudolf, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kevin Rudolf is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kevin Rudolf, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Secret Admirer (Pitbull song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Secret Admirer (Pitbull song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 17:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Footballers nicknames

Just to let you know the nickname field in the {{Infobox Football biography}} is redundant and doesn't appear. Peanut4 (talk) 01:22, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Birdman (rapper), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability and the content has been removed. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 04:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sexy Ladies

A tag has been placed on Sexy Ladies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. fuzzy510 (talk) 23:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of New Boyz

A tag has been placed on New Boyz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page on a rap music group simply redirects to a page of record company artists. No references provided. No encyclopedic info provided in article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Manway (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Jeremih (album). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 18:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lisa Tucker (singer)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lisa Tucker (singer). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Tucker (singer). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wasted (Gucci Mane song)

The article Wasted (Gucci Mane song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 17:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Greg Street

I have nominated Greg Street, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Street. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Izno (talk) 01:58, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lil Ru

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lil Ru. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Ru. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of J. Futuristic

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is J. Futuristic. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Futuristic. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of There Goes My Baby (Usher song)

The article There Goes My Baby (Usher song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't see anything remarkable about this song

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aiken ♫ 18:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of There Goes My Baby (Usher song)

I have nominated There Goes My Baby (Usher song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/There Goes My Baby (Usher song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aiken ♫ 12:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bobby Brackins

A tag has been placed on Bobby Brackins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Blue Rasberry 03:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ja-Bar

I have nominated Ja-Bar, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ja-Bar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Guy (Help!) 09:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Peecee1978! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Big Reese - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khalil (singer)

The article Khalil (singer) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. mark nutley (talk) 23:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monster (Kanye West song)

The article Monster (Kanye West song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Click23 (talk) 18:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khalil (singer)

The article Khalil (singer) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. mark nutley (talk) 07:32, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sean Paul Temperature.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sean Paul Temperature.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khalil (singer)

The article Khalil (singer) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roscoe Dash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roscoe Dash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Show Out (Roscoe Dash song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Show Out (Roscoe Dash song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not add unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Secret ^account 07:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kanye West, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Climax (Usher song) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Dan56 (talk) 23:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Belle Humble

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Belle Humble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SKATER ^{Is Back} 18:31, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of K. Michelle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K. Michelle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Michelle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 05:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mullage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mullage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mullage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. STATic message me! 20:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about I'm Different

Hello, Peecee1978,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether I'm Different should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Different .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, -MJH (talk) 22:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ASAP Rocky. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:14, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect blanking

Hi, if you have an issue with a redirect that doesn't qualify for speedy deletion, please take it to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion rather than blank the page as you did with H-Money. Thanks! -- KTC (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Dope (song), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 19:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Montana (rapper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Montana (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 05:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stoicville: The Phoenix

The article Stoicville: The Phoenix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mlpearc Phone (Powwow) 22:07, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Animal Ambition may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* "Don't Worry About It" {{small|(featuring [[Yo Gotti]])} (small|produced by [[Charli Brown Beatz]]}<ref name="xxlmag.com">http://www.xxlmag.com/news/2014/02/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Jig Is Up (Dump'n) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Jig Is Up (Dump'n). Since you had some involvement with the The Jig Is Up (Dump'n) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 20:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Y.R.N.: Tha Album

The article Y.R.N.: Tha Album has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Forthcoming albums are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, per WP:NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 13:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can't Feel My Face (The Weeknd song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Can't Feel My Face (The Weeknd song). Since you had some involvement with the Can't Feel My Face (The Weeknd song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sofffie7 (talk) 22:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ISU

Peecee, what is the connection between ISU (singer) and MC The Max? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He is a member of the band.

The article doesn't list ISU as a member. In fact, those letters don't even appear in the article text at all. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Slime Season 2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Slime Season 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Berek (talk) 12:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Million (song)

Hello, Peecee1978,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Million (song) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Million (song) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Chris Troutman (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Peecee1978. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sober (Childish Gambino song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sober (Childish Gambino song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sober (Childish Gambino song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kellymoat (talk) 01:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Winner (Jamie Foxx album) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Winner (Jamie Foxx album). Since you had some involvement with the Winner (Jamie Foxx album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KP4 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect KP4. Since you had some involvement with the KP4 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. f e minist 14:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oblivion (T-Pain album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oblivion (T-Pain album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oblivion (T-Pain album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Peecee1978. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 6 Tre G for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 6 Tre G is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6 Tre G until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mattg82 (talk) 01:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buried Alive (Logic song)

The article Buried Alive (Logic song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No charts, no sources other than those to prove its existence, fails notability criterion

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 00:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Peecee1978. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unreleased Killadelphia Muzik listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unreleased Killadelphia Muzik. Since you had some involvement with the Unreleased Killadelphia Muzik redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Blu listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John Blu. Since you had some involvement with the John Blu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:50, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Shawty Putt" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shawty Putt. Since you had some involvement with the Shawty Putt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. BDD (talk) 21:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dog Love

Hello, Peecee1978

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Padavalamkuttanpilla, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Dog Love, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Padavalamkuttanpilla}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Padavalam🌂 ► 12:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Selfish (Asia Cruise song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Selfish (Asia Cruise song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selfish (Asia Cruise song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aoba47 (talk) 02:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chikezie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chikezie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikezie (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Hernandez (singer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Hernandez (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hernandez (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Hastings East (Vancouver)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hastings East (Vancouver) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 31 § Hastings East (Vancouver) until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (talk) 21:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]