User talk:Pear1020/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Pear1020. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sinus Tarsi syndrome has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 21:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Two accounts
As long as you do not use your two accounts to edit the same articles or Talk pages, as that would be sockpuppetry that would lead to both accounts being indefinitely blocked. David notMD (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh wait, is just general editing on the same page not okay? I was under the impression that it was not okay if you used them to edit war, block evade, stuff like that. Idk I thought I read through Wikipedia:SOCKLEGIT enough but maybe I didn't. I just had a kid steal my computer and vandalize our school wiki with it (i stopped him before he published it) and I don't feel comfortable doxxing the IP because it's pretty static, so I made an extra account cuz privacy yk.
- I'm aware of what will happen if I start using these accounts maliciously, so I'll do my best to avoid that at all costs. I understand your suspicion, as how many people on Wikipedia, that had a dormant account randomly wake up and start editing again and have ANOTHER account also editing, are friendly?
- This is me just rambling TL;DR: I will stick to one account and abandon this one if necessary, I was just under the impression that as long as I'm constructive and not destructive the two accounts are permissible. Pear1020 (talk) 14:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
My sincere apology for irrational AfD
I just wanted to write this to tell my deepest apology for a two-week gap within both AfDs involving Shanika Minor. It was just that the interest wasn't prominent in the public world to receive notability attention on Wikipedia, even without my view into source. It seems why I have to nominate it for discussion without looking into it first. I hope you understand. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 20:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you taking the time to leave a message! I am glad you realized what the problem was with your nomination, though I agree that there was some proper sentiment behind it, it needed more research. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 21:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Elise Kesselbeck (February 24)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elise Kesselbeck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Pear1020!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 14:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
|
Administrators' newsletter – March 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
Technical news
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
Arbitration
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Technical news
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
Arbitration
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Buttien-Fryns syndrome has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 21:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Speedy deletion declined: Konstantios & Evripidis Trachoniou
Hello Pear1020, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Konstantios & Evripidis Trachoniou, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7: passed review in 2016; deletion should be by discussion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- i was unaware of that, oops, my bad Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 14:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)