User talk:Pbritti/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Question about DYK

Hello. First of all, I'd like to thank you for your review of my DYK submission regarding the Liberia–United Kingdom relations article. Secondly, I have a question about the DYK process. This is the first time I've participated in it, and I'm having a hard time learning about some of the specifics. I understand the eligibility requirements for a given article or fact, but I'm less clear of the exact process by which a fact appears on the Main Page. Does an article need a certain amount of positive reviews in order to be put on the Main Page? If that is true, how many are necessary? Is there another step after public reviewing? I'd appreciate it if you could help me clear up this ambiguity. RoundSquare (talk) 00:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@RoundSquare: Glad you asked! First off, your DYK has passed, meaning that only one of the DYK team members could stop it from proceeding (if you have more questions, theleekycauldron is great at discussing that process). Second, now that your DYK has passed, a team member will pluck it from the nomination page and put it on the approved hook page, from which it will "eventually" hit the front page. Since yours doesn't include a picture, I would say you'll see it on the main page within the next month; you'll get a ping when it hits the main page but I would keep an eye to see when it is variously upgraded to the queue then prep templates (I can show you where those are if you're having trouble). Always willing to answer any other questions you have, but I'm no expert and will gladly direct you to those who are. Great username, by the way. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:31, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ted Decker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ted Decker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Decker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TonyBallioni (talk) 23:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Final warnings, final schmarning

Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Praxidicae, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 23:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@TheresNoTime: See WP:BOOMERANG per see our previous interaction. You and your fellow editor’s behavior is way out of bounds. This is your only warning before I file a request for outside admin intervention. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Which "previous interaction" is that? — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 23:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		I hope it's not too early to call this, but great work on Yuhanon Mar Meletius! StAnselm (talk) 17:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

@StAnselm: Thank you! Not my finest work, but it's a start. Great catch on that image; it's gotta be one of like only a dozen actually copyright free photos of Indian bishops we have on the Commons. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

"Anglican Orthodox Southern Episcopal Church" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anglican Orthodox Southern Episcopal Church and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 4#Anglican Orthodox Southern Episcopal Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 12:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

I am a member of the Al Sadr Family

Hello, I am not sure if this is the correct place to write this as I am new to Wikipedia. I am a part of the Al Sadr lineage, and I was wondering if I could add to add to the family tree. My grandfather is Muqtada's cousin. Please inquire if you would like any kind of proof or please direct me to the correct people. Thanks Again, Jafar Baker Alsadir JayAlsadir (talk) 18:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Opera in Ukraine

September songs

Thank you for reviewing Opera in Ukraine! - 1 September: I remembered the Vespro della Beata Vergine, 2 September: the last of the Rheingau Musik Festival concerts, and yesterday we read The Story of Mr Sommer, and followed Ruth Lapide. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Gerda Arendt, for continually bolstering the presence of sourced and quality articles on the project; I've learned quite a bit about hymns from your articles and those you helped improve–so much so, I actually went and got a '75 Gotteslob for personal use. Your presence is appreciated and valued. From the U.S. to wherever you are, happy Labor Day! ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

That's quite touching, thank you! - A rainbow today, and a deer yesterday (but hard to see) - Jubilate Deo --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

The rose pic was taken on 11 Sep 2021, and this year was full of music that day, Tag des offenen Denkmals, not only singing in church and rehearsals for Verdi's Requiem, but two concerts at special places pictured, one a synagogue (pictured on its wall). Today three DYK: a piece we'll perform on Sunday, a violinist we heard in June playing the Berg Concerto, and a Youth Orchestra shaped by a conductor who recently died. Almost too much of a good thing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Today, we sang old music for two choirs at church, pictured, scroll to the image of the organ of the month of the Diocese of Limburg (my perspective), and if you have time, watch the video about it --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: I think something went awry and I can't see the image nor the video. If you could link both again I would really appreciate it! ~ Pbritti (talk) 06:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Where did you get lost? Did you follow the link? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: I did and it took me to what I think must have been the wrong portion of your talk page. My apologies. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

No need to apologise if I'm not clear. I change my talk, [a lot, so supply a link to the state I mean. Once you get there, and scroll down, do you find an organ? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Ah! I see what I was looking for; Command+F is my friend. Appreciate your patience and kindness on here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

thank you! - travel and strings sound --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Primer (prayer book)

On 7 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Primer (prayer book), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the word "dirge" for funeral hymns can be traced to primer prayer books? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Primer (prayer book). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Primer (prayer book)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Dirge

On 7 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dirge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the word "dirge" for funeral hymns can be traced to primer prayer books? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Primer (prayer book). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dirge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Pbritti, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed' and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned prolific creators of articles where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Vanamonde (Talk) 10:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Yay! Jahaza (talk) 18:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

@Jahaza: Yay indeed! ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Ted Decker

On 11 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ted Decker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Home Depot CEO Ted Decker ran his own landscaping business in high school? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ted Decker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ted Decker), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Yuhanon Mar Meletius

On 12 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yuhanon Mar Meletius, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church bishop Yuhanon Mar Meletius said that Christian Sangh Parivar sympathizers are "moving on a suicidal path"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yuhanon Mar Meletius. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yuhanon Mar Meletius), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Ordinal (liturgy)

On 13 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ordinal (liturgy), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite two 16th-century books often being referred to as the Edwardine Ordinals, the word "ordinal" was not applied to them until the 17th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ordinal (liturgy). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ordinal (liturgy)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Edwardine Ordinals

On 13 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edwardine Ordinals, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite two 16th-century books often being referred to as the Edwardine Ordinals, the word "ordinal" was not applied to them until the 17th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ordinal (liturgy). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Edwardine Ordinals), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, interesting! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

AfD for Seraphim Rose (book)

This is an FYI that an article you contributed to, Seraphim Rose (book), has been nominated for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seraphim Rose (book) -AuthorAuthor (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your reverts

Hello fellow Catholic. I was not aware of the discussions at WP:RSN. Thank you for pointing that out. It seemed like it was another Quora-like site, which seemed odd for Wikipedia. I would recommend adding a quote from Raymond Brown or John P. Meier to better ensure WP:NPOV. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Scorpions13256: No worries; I'm only aware because it came up last month in a separate discussion. I'm not familiar with source from both you mentioned, so I would encourage you to take that on. If they're reliable and have recognition on this subject, I'm on board with your proposal and will support you should there be a hiccup! ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

They are two Catholic priests who are well respected by academics. I haven't read their work carefully enough though. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

I know of a Catholic editor who is excellent at finding sources for Christianity-related articles. I'll ping him if you'd like. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Scorpions13256: Sure; this week will unfortunately not see much from me on here so I apologize for any slowness in responses after this evening. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

No problem. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

While DS alerts should never be taken as a finding of wrongdoing, that is particularly the case here; I'm just giving these to anyone who's made recent reverts at Crisis pregnancy center, as it is now under a 72-hour 1RR. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

@Tamzin: Thanks! I hadn't seen any notices outside the intent to implement this policy so I appreciate the heads-up. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)