User talk:Paulhummerman

Welcome!

Hello, Paulhummerman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 84.90.1.109 18:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Neuroscience

Hi, just a note that I've moved your comment to Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Neuroscience, where it is much more likely to get attention. Looie496 (talk) 03:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Synergistic epistasis

Hi - at Talk:Evolution of sex you say the red line is synergistic epistasis, but at Talk:Epistasis you say it's the blue line; I would like to know which is your actual belief? :) Evercat (talk) 23:02, 30 November 2011 (UTC) Thanks for pointing this out. My comment in "Evolution of Sex" talk was correct: the red line (increasing slope, convex) is the synergistic epistasis case: each additional mutation produces a larger effect on fitness. I believe the figure legend has now been corrected to reflect this (not by me). I'm not sure why I wrote in the talk section of "Epistasis" that the blue line was the synergistic case, and I have now completely removed my comment. So I think everything is fine now.Paulhummerman (talk) 02:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I believe the Y-axis should be log(fitness) rather than fitness though? Evercat (talk) 20:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could use an expert, if you can spare some time

"I admire those who actually get things rolling, even if they are not really "experts"

I hope you still have that great attitude! I'm not an expert. Saw your comments on Talk:Connectome. Been working on a broad "list of" type page for brain mapping in general, and to help answer questions on the general topic and questions about the four huge giant brain mapping projects currently underway. I also have a starter list of questions where I think you would be so much better informed (starting with a much higher base) than I. User:Rjlabs/Brain mapping frequently asked questions. Any comments most welcome! Now I'm headed back to your Talk:Connectome comment to try to digest ... :)
Rick (talk) 03:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Range

Ruby-throats breed not only in the southeastern US (as stated in the Range section) but also in the North-east and eastern Canada.Paulhummerman (talk) 01:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miscommunication (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miscommunication and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Paulhummerman, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Miscommunication concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Miscommunication, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miscommunication

Hello, Paulhummerman. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Miscommunication".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Open channel block) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Open channel block, Paulhummerman!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 01:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A-B separation

The diagram shows a separation of 4 arc-seconds, but the text says 6 (in 2017). Which is currently correct?Paulhummerman (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Labeled map needed.

The article describes a number of features both inside and around the Sea, but the images are all unlabeled. Since the actual view from a telescope can vary greatly in orientation, it would be helpful to provide a labeled map of this part of the Moon. It would also be helpful to explain why there are no visible craters in the sea despite 4 billion years of bombardment.````