User talk:Pathfounder
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Pathfounder! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 00:38, Friday, March 17, 2017 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Pathfounder! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 00:43, Friday, March 17, 2017 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
| File:Geotextiles and Geomembranes Journal Cover.gif | |
| Discipline | Geosynthetics |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Edited by | R. Kerry Rowe |
| Publication details | |
| History | 1984-present |
| Publisher | Elsevier (Netherlands) |
| Frequency | Biquarterly |
| 2.366 (2015) | |
| Indexing | |
| ISSN | 0266-1144 |
| Links | |
Geotextiles and Geomembranes is a biquarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal. Geotextiles and Geomembranes is the official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society. The journal publishes technical papers, technical notes, discussion and book reviews on all topics relating to geosynthetics, research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Contributors include research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. According to the SCImago Journal Rank, the journal is ranked number one in the 2015 category of Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology.[1]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]External links
[edit]Speedy deletion nomination of International Geosynthetics Society
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on International Geosynthetics Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CataracticPlanets (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Pathfounder, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to International Geosynthetics Society have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bituminous Geomembranes (BGMs) has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Pathfounder. Thank you for your work on Double liner. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Reviewed during NPP. This is a generic two word combo like "big dog" and the only source is a paper and even that is not about the term specifically. This looks like it might make a good paragraph in a suitable article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
@North8000:, thank you for the comment. I understand your concern but perhaps elaborating on the context will assuage the concern. First, although this design method is now extremely common, the geosynthetics industry is still in a state where various missleading terms can be used for this type of system. Some of the terms such as "leak detection layer" are overly technical for such an article and don't capture the generality of the use cases of these systems. Secondly, the one paper cited in this article is special because is authored by the inventor of this design method (JP Giroud, known as the father of geosynthetics) and the term is used in the first line of his abstract. In geosynthetics, the words of JP Giroud carry significant weight. It is possible that a more standardized terminology evolves from the industry but this should serve as a good starting point and indeed could prevail as the prevalent term in perpetuity. Pathfounder (talk) 22:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Pathfounder. Thank you for your work on Double liner. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
See article talk. Marking as reviewed. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 16:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)