User talk:Renamed user v08an9234vu

This is Renamed user v08an9234vu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Josip Broz Tito

Why did you revert my edit. I am a historian and the entire Tito's page looks like like it was written by his mother. He was a communist dicator not a benevolant. I lived it, Sir! Tito was responsible for over million people killed by his direct orderes. If Wikipedia is a communist propaganda machine for some Yugoslav communists who do not contribute a dime to Wikioedia than I apologize — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.170.40.4 (talk) 06:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, anonymous user. I reverted your edit to Josip Broz Tito because it was not grammatically correct and did not make sense. If you have concerns about the article and would like changes to be made, I would suggest starting a discussion on the article's talk page and seeking consensus with other editors. Also, please remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end. CataracticPlanets (talk) 06:16, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hi, recently you've left a message regarding the Libyan Bombing of 1986. According to you I haven't explained why I changed the content.

There was indeed an explanation to be found. Appskovicc (talk) 21:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Appskovic:Sorry, I should have been more specific rather than just leaving a default message. I restored the content you removed because it was supported by a citation to the Guardian, a reliable source. You said the information was "propagandic" and biased - could you explain further? We have to go by what the sources say. CataracticPlanets (talk) 07:50, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending

Hi CataracticPlanets! I understand that some folks may create a vanity page full of superlatives and boasts. However, the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Ann_Felke-Morris article should not be deleted because it is a factual article about an author of textbooks that are used internationally. It would be great if my publisher, Pearson Education (who took over Addison-Wesley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addison-Wesley) , had a publicist for their authors. They do not As an author of web development textbooks since 2003, I have to serve as my own publicist. I could have traded favors with a friend to ask them to create a page for me but I decided to be straightforward and just create it myself. There are no superlatives. There are numerous citations. I did not even mention that both textbooks have been translated into Chinese and Russian. I tried to keep it to the facts. So, I implore you to not delete this factual article. Thank you for your consideration of my request. TerryMorris99 (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TerryMorris99: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Generally, editors here are strongly discouraged from writing articles about themselves, as this presents concerns about conflict of interest. If you are notable enough to have your own article, an editor will eventually get around to writing one about you. For more information you can see our policy at WP:AUTO. It is true that your article had a factual and non-promotional tone, but this is not why I tagged it for potential deletion. I did so because I felt it did not indicate why its subject was important or significant. The relevant policy can be found at WP:A7. I won't be making the final decision on whether or not to delete the article - that will be up to an administrator, who will carefully consider the message you left on the article's talk page. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Racism in United States politics

Hello, can you explain why you reverted my edit of removing a section that was clearly taken out of context and wrong? I cited the actual speech it was referencing. The Charlottesville section is also taken out of context and I proved that with my second citation.

Oxford Dictionary defines racism as: The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/racism

Here is the summary I used explaining my edits: “Removed the opinion link for the Donald Trump Presidential Campaign Announcement. Removed the misquote and lack of context about the wall. The Full Speech can be seen here as recorded by C-SPAN; the Mexico portion is in the first 5 min of the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apjNfkysjbM

Retweeting a meme does not = racism

Charlottesville is also taken out of context https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/15/politics/trump-charlottesville-delay/index.html “ Tsurani (talk) 06:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tsurani: Hi, I reverted your edit because it removed content from the article which had been cited to reliable sources. Especially in dealing with controversial subjects such as this one, it's important to remain neutral, go by what the sources say, and not edit in order to promote a particular point of view. Also, please remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end. CataracticPlanets (talk) 05:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry still new to this format. How about using the actual video link to the speech (which i supplied) and allow the readers to make up their mind instead of using an article from the Washington Post which ran over 1,500 Russian collusion articles on Trump. The Washington Post and many other media entities lost a lot of credibility when Mueller's Report was released. C-SPAN is trusted by a lot more people than the Washington Post especially after the Hoax fallout Tsurani (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tsurani: The Washington Post would generally be considered an extremely reliable source. Generally, secondary sources such as a book or newspaper article are preferred over primary sources such as a video of a speech. CataracticPlanets (talk) 22:48, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Jacab

Tell me what i need to add in this page? how would it not be deleted? (talk) 01:09, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Djene94: Hi, I tagged Daniel Jacab for deletion under criteria WP:A7 because it did not make a credible claim as to why its subject was important or significant. If you want to contest the deletion, you can leave a message on the article's talk page explaining why you feel the article should not be deleted. CataracticPlanets (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of "criticism of hate group concept"

A) How can one be neutral in outlining criticisms of the "hate group" concept? I'm laying out criticisms of the concept. You can't lay out and flesh out the criticisms without being critical. B) Would you really want someone not critical of the "hate group" concept writing the section on "criticism of the hate group concept"? Isn't defending the concept quite literally what the entire rest of the article is about? I don't see anywhere in the article where the other authors are presenting opposing arguments to the claims they are making. I see basically zero balance elsewhere. C) If you don't think the section appears balanced/neutral (we are dealing with appearances here mind you), then focus on the language you think is biased or partisan and modify or remove it, or ask me to. Don't remove the whole post/section. I'm more than happy to try to make the section seem balanced. Otherwise it just looks like you are trying to censor particular perspectives, which you are, by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.155.121.120 (talk) 01:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, anonymous user. I reverted your contributions to Hate group for the following reasons:

1. The "Criticism" section you added was 15 paragraphs long, much longer than any other section. Thus, it gave undue weight to those perspectives critical of the concept of hate groups.

2. The section you added contained numerous opinionated, tendentious statements and language, rather than being a neutral summary of the sources cited. It contained original research and improper synthesis of published material.

I see that you have continued to re-insert the section into the article multiple times despite being reverted by other editors. Please don't do this again: it constitutes edit warring and will likely lead to your being blocked. CataracticPlanets (talk) 05:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my pages

Sir why are you deleting my pages that I created for the Atlanta Falcons draft picks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falcaholic (talk • contribs) 17:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Falcaholic: Hi Falcaholic, I placed deletion tags on these pages because they were biographies of living persons that did not have any references. I see that you have added a reference or two to each one, however please be aware that these articles are still much too short and lack the necessary references to establish notability. They may still be deleted through the articles for deletion process as a result. I would suggest that you work on articles in draftspace, using the articles for creation process, rather than creating them in mainspace. Also, please remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end. CataracticPlanets (talk) 21:50, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks!

Keith chau yet (talk) 12:29, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Article deletion

My Article 林澤群 that I created, however it's ordered for a speedy deletion, so may you please read the Talk page, i've reply for the Contested deletion already, thank you.

@Keith chau yet: An administrator will consider the message you left before deciding whether to delete the article. Also, please remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end. CataracticPlanets (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

/* Lucas being a cutie */

Hi I am so sorry i did not mean to publish those changes, I was just playing around. After I did publish them, I did not know how to delete them. It wiil not happen again

Not a problem! In the future if you want to play around and get some practice editing you can use the sandbox. Also when you post on someone's talk page type four tildes (~~~~) at the end to sign your post. CataracticPlanets (talk) 17:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent reverts to Kaizad Gustad's page

Hey there! I notice you reverted the edit that removed details of the "incident" section of Kaizad Gustad's page. Since you did so, it has been deleted again, and indeed over time there has been a consistent history of accounts being created with the sole apparent goal of removing this information. Is there anything you can do? Thanks so much! 157.131.143.60 (talk) 20:09, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I restored the section in question. CataracticPlanets (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Luke Brown (author)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Luke Brown (author), which you proposed for deletion. I have found and added one reliable source. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!--Hugsyrup (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Baltic Germans

Hi,

Why did you delete my insertion of "Musterknaben" in the following sentence?

Initially only 12 Germans were allowed to settle in 1948.

FYI, the word "Musterknaben" is German for "model lads", which is how the 12 Germans were described by fellow Baltic Germans. I personally met a number of them.

Sorry, looks like I mistakenly identified your good-faith edits as vandalism. Mea culpa. Feel free to try again, although I'd suggest providing a translation of the word. CataracticPlanets (talk) 19:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]