Jump to content

User talk:Patar knight/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11→Archive 15

Milhist A-class and Peer Reviews Jul-Dec 2009

 Military history reviewers' award 
By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews during the period July-December 2009, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Milhist A-Class and Peer reviews Jan-Jun 2010

 Military history reviewers' award 
By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews for the period Jan-Jun 2010, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. Ian Rose (talk) 09:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)



The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Project Eden (company)

I'm not seeing a claim to notability. Care to enlighten me? 69.181.249.92 (talk) 03:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator?

Will you be re-standing as a coordinator? I haven't seen you fill in your standing for reelection tab at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/September 2010, and given that we still have room for a few more candidates to be elected/reelected I was curious to know if you were going to stand again. I would personally be very happy to welcome you back, but if you would prefer not to stand again I can certainly understand that. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm happy to see you've decided to stand again; even if you aren't reelected (and I don't know why you wouldn't be) I think that it helps the moral of the project members to have as many options as possible in the coordinator tranche makeup. TomStar81 (Talk) 02:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 19:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

Thanks

The WikiProject Barnstar
In gratitude of your service as coordinator for the Military history Project from March 2010 to September 2010, I hereby award you this WikiProject Barnstar. —TomStar81 (Talk) 23:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Patar knight. I just wanted to say thanks for your efforts as co-ord last session and good on you for volunteering again. I'm sorry to see that you didn't more votes in the election. It was a very strong field this time, though, so I hope it won't leave you too disheartened. I hope to see you around the place still. Take care. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

Outline of Saskatchewan has gone live

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

Proposed deletion of Connaught National Army Cadet Training Centre

The article Connaught National Army Cadet Training Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable per WP:NOTABLE and WP:MILMOS/N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anotherclown (talk) 07:35, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)



The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

Heads up about an RfC

Please note that there's a new discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure in which you may wish to comment. It is expected to close in about a week. You have received this message because you participated in a similar discussion (2009 AC2 RfC) last year.  Roger talk 05:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

David Johnston move request

Could you please move David Lloyd Johnston to David Johnston, and appropriate links to David Johnston (disambiguation)? And could you please delete my typo, David Johnston (disambigulation)? Thanks. Richard Yetalk 01:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

 Done This request has been processed. Happy editting. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

Thomas Scott Adams

Hello,

I do not understand why my article was deleted. Thomas Scott Adams is a real person who ran for the Thousand Oaks City Counsel.

Sincerely, Jess —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.173.120 (talk) 03:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

The subject of your article was clearly not suitable for inclusion. Being real is no threshold (I'm real and so are you, but we don't deserve articles), and running for a Council seat in a city of less than a quarter-million, and losing, with no other notable accomplishments, doesn't merit someone a Wikipedia article. Compare for example, the amount of candidates who have pages in the latest Ottawa municipal election for a metropolis of around 1 million people. Out of 25 candidates, only 5 have articles (1 was a provincial minister and former mayor, 1 was the former mayor and a prominent business man, and the other 3 were all long-time politicians, of which one is also a noted author, another was a mayor of a (now) suburb of Ottawa, while the last was an member of the provincial parliament). The other candidates are like your Thomas Scott Adams, they ran, didn't make it, but seem to have done little else of significance outside of the city. I'm sure that Thomas Scott Adams is a very agreeable person, but he doesn't meet our notability guidelines for politicians, unless you can prove he has received massive amounts of press coverage. Sorry, --Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

HLIND

why did you delete hawk light ind —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacked101 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

It didn't meet our notability guidelines, and gave no credible reason why it might meet those guidelines. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Timothy Allison

Hello, Would it be appropriate to write an article about Tim Allison? He ran against Elton Gallegly, but lost. He is mentioned in the article "United States House of Representatives elections in California, 2010, but there is no separate article on him.

Thanks, 76.89.173.120 (talk) 05:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

As a rule of thumb, losing candidates in relatively minor elections who don't receive extraordinary press coverage (e.g. Christine O'Donnell-esque) generally don't have articles, unless they've done something else of note. Sorry, --Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:02, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Toby turner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Toby turner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sailsbystars (talk • contribs • email) 04:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

Why

Why did you undo my edits to santa claus, it was informative, in neutral point of view and cited. Why undo it, it was constructive to this site? I demand to know!59.154.42.136 (talk) 04:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

It isn't helpful. The tradition of Santa giving coal is already mentioned five times in the article , including one reference in the lede itself, so adding it is repetitive. It also brings undue weight to this rather minor tradition which isn't there in all cultures that have a Santa in them. Lastly, IMDB is not a reliable source, so it's not cited.--Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Reg: deletion of article on "Kotha Hari Krishna"

Hi Patar,

Please restore the article on the "Kotha Hari Krishna", he is a budding entrepreuner and source of inspiration for many, Also please provide me the content that has been deleted. Please mail the content to "ravi.nifty@gmail.com" Ravi.nifty (talk) 18:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

I have not restored the article, per my reservations about that outlined in the e-mail I just sent you. However, the text is harmless, so I sent that to you, with the caveat that you do not repost this article. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:39, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of da bomb

I created da bomb (which you speedied under G2) as a genuine {{wi}} redirect page. The redirect may not be desirable, but in any case it was definitely not a test page. (I accept that I accidentally typed {{subst:longcontent}} instead of {{subst:longcomment}}, but such an error does not make it a test page.)

I wish to re-create the page, but I will not do so without your advice. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:14, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, it seems that another user removed the {{wi}} template from the page, and made it seem like a test page, since now it only consisted of a non-existant template. I think that your best bet would be to make a disambiguation page at Da bomb, add a short explanation of the term, add all the search results with that in its name (there were at least 3 when I just searched), and then add Template:Wiktionary to that disambiguation page.--Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 Done most of the the above. I might've screwed some things up because it's nearly 2 AM over here. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010



To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Suicide of Nicola Raphael

As you closed the first AfD, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Nicola Raphael (2nd nomination). JohnCD (talk) 14:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

Thank You!

The Featured Sound Main Page Proposal Voter Barnstar
I was truly humbled by the overwhelming community support for the recent proposal to place featured sounds on the main page. The proposal closed on Tuesday with 57 people in support and only 2 in opposition.

It should take a few weeks for everything to get coded and tested, and once that is done the community will be presented with a mock up to assess on aesthetic appeal.

Finally, I invite all of you to participate in the featured sounds process itself. Whether you're a performer, an uploader, or just come across a sound file you find top quality, and that meets the featured sound criteria, you can nominate it at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. Featured sounds is also looking for people to help assess candidates (also at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates.)

Thanks again for such a strong showing of support, and I hope to see you at featured sounds in the future.
Sven Manguard Wha?
Adam Cuerden (talk)
(X! · talk)

Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11→Archive 15
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Patar_knight/Archive_9&oldid=1144598339"