User talk:Pallavi.p.g28

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke was changed by Pallavi.p.g28 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882087 on 2020-10-14T15:57:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke was changed by Pallavi.p.g28 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855289 on 2020-10-16T10:28:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Udaariyaan. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Per MOS:TVPLOT, prose plot summaries of seasons should contain no more than 500 words. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 17:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of wrong information

Dear pallavi.p.g28 Why are you constantly and repeatedly editing wrong information in Wikipedia regarding Udaariyaan? Do you even watch the serial daily? I think you don't That's why you are repeatedly editing Nehmat and Ekam as husband and wife. They are boyfriend and girlfriend respectively but they didn't get married to each other as per the show. As per the show, Ekam is Harleen's husband and Nehmat's unborn child's father whereas Nehmat is Ekam's girlfriend and Ekam's unborn child's mother and not wife. N1942J1962 (talk) 08:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

makers of this show had already declared Ekam and Nehmat married in Gurudwara. And for the same reason they had considered their intimation scene too, and so Nehmat is pregnant now with Ekam's child Pallavi.p.g28 (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pallavi.p.g.28 the show clearly shows Ekam and Harleen getting married in front of the Randhawa and Sandhu families and also importantly infront of the media. So why are you constantly deleting Harleen as Ekam's wife and Ekam as Harleen's husband? — Preceding unsigned comment added by N1942J1962 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear N1942J1962, marriage is considered, when it is legally valid. When Ekam was already married and Harleen wasn't even divorced yet, how they are married then??? Pallavi.p.g28 (talk) 13:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about another account

I am going to ask you this directly: Are you and Mateus G.2.5 connected in any way? If so, you should read the policy on using multiple accounts. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No i am not connected to @MateusG.2.5. Infact i am revising this user id's changes on this page Pallavi.p.g28 (talk) 16:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing on kasauti zindagi kay show

Please follow norms of Wikipedia and don't edit in disruptive way. I recently undo your edit on Wikipedia of kasauti zindagi kay page. The information comes from authentic source page Hotstar. Please don't make it again. Hectoedias (talk) 17:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asking Information

Do you know the real names of the new (aged ones) Ekam, Harleen and Deepak Dhillon? If yes, then answer me back with a reply. 116.206.202.50 (talk) 10:09, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Udaariyaan

I am fed up of you changing Udaariyan's page! Nehmat is adopted, what don't you get?? And Isha played as the main role! Stop changing that. You are honestly so annoying. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 00:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pranali Rathod, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 17:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Udaariyaan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 11:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Udaariyaan, you may be blocked from editing. ManaliJain (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #79188

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pallavi.p.g28. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]