User talk:Whothatwhothatwhothstboi

August 2023

Hello, I'm Estar8806. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User talk:Priya 43434. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Profane language should be avoided at all costs while communicating with other editors. Thanks, estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry. I was just so upset. Priya keeps changing the accurate edits to wrong things. It has been pissing me off. If she stops doing that, I wouldn't have to be so harsh. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 23:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong answer. You can be civil. You're getting upset about a TV show. --Onorem (talk) 05:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not about the show. The audacity to keep changing the wikipedia page. I worked hard to keep it updated and accurate, but she keeps changing it to innacurate material. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hi Whothatwhothatwhothstboi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Udaariyaan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 04:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Udaariyaan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I'm not the first user to revert your unnecessary, unexplained, unverified, and excessively detailed edits in this article. You want to update some number? Do it--but not while adding loads of redundant detail please. Drmies (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh of course! Sorry about that. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 06:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pukaar – Dil Se Dil Tak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pukaar – Dil Se Dil Tak, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pukaar – Dil Se Dil Tak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I would not advise restoring this WP:FANCRUFT again without consensus. See WP:ONUS. CNMall41 (talk) 08:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am not really familiar with Wiki rules. I am just here to make sure the plot and the cast are accurate with ITV show articles. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anurager Chhowa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CNMall41 (talk) 22:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, no one likes your changes. Why are you hellbent on changing things when it has always been done this way?? It’s infuriating. People come to Wikipedia to learn the plot and see if it’s worth watching or not. The cast list is there to understand how characters are related to one another. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 02:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CIVILITY

Please review WP:CIVIL compared to your edit summary. Should you decide to be uncivil or revert again, it will be brought up at WP:ANI. If you feel this fancruft should be included in the article, it is up to you per WP:ONUS to get consensus. CNMall41 (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure bud. Let’s see if people like you messing with all their hard work and deleting it within seconds. Whothatwhothatwhothstboi (talk) 02:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, WP:FANCRUFT is not allowed. This is an encyclopedia, not IMDb or WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Has nothing to do with me. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]