User talk:Pali Upadhyay

Welcome!

Hello, Pali Upadhyay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Johnuniq (talk) 03:45, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Your recent editing history at Mamata Banerjee shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Johnuniq (talk) 03:45, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq:The revertions of my edits were made on the false premise of having sourced material removed. The edit consisted of shifting a section of the article to a more appropriate section which itself seems uncontested alongside some basic copyediting which too remain unaddressed in the current state. If you were to check the contents of the edit itself no source material was removed and neither have the reverters clarified the reasoning for their actions so I don't know what concern I would possibly be addressing in the talk page, this alongside one of the reverters having a moderate level of vandalism makes me suspect they are in good faith in the first place. Pali Upadhyay (talk) 07:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please immediately respond at Talk:Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir

Please explain your edit warring-like actions at the talk page of Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir— Vaibhavafro ^💬 07:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for giving an explanation, but you seem to be resorting to personal attacks on me by alleging partisan bias. Furthermore, you explanation is incomplete. Please explain further on the talk page of the article.— Vaibhavafro ^💬 13:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir#Genocide Watch. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You should not personally attack editors, like you did when you alleged partisan bias against me in this section of the article Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. Please keep this in mind. — Vaibhavafro ^💬 14:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overdone edit.

Hi again, looks like you overdid my edit by mistake here[1][2]. Can you restore it, thanks. You can delete this message afterwards if you don't wanna keep it. KasimMejia (talk) 11:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Citizenship (Amendment) Bill protests

On 16 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Citizenship (Amendment) Bill protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. --DBig Xrayᗙ 16:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The state list is in chronological order, do not make it alphabetical. also use WP:EDITSUMMARYDBig Xrayᗙ 21:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: It is in chronological order, the Delhi protests were the first outside of Northeast India.

December 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Protests of 2019, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: It's okay, I was about to add citations though, I'll re-add it with them. Pali Upadhyay (talk) 13:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CAA protest

See Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Citizenship_Amendment_Act_protests. ~~I am asking you to make a request at WP:PERM for Extended confirmed. Once you make the request, let me know so that I can support you there.~~ --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 15:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the EC right for you is no longer needed now that the protection is off. You will get that eventually so no need to bother. Keep up the good work. --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 18:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The admins agreed to remove the protection so you can now edit the protest article yourself. but remember to not WP:EDITWAR, since the article has been put on WP:1RR restriction. So if you get reverted, start a thread on the talk page like you did today. regards. --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 18:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: Ah okay, thanks for your support regardlessly and sorry for the edit war-ish behavior. Pali Upadhyay (talk) 19:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Glad that you learned more about editing in this episode. Please do check and follow WP:BRD. It will help you to handle the situation in a better way next time you find yourself in an edit war. --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 20:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You now have the EC rights given automatically based on your edit count. Here is your service award based on your contributions. Feel free to move it to your user page and update your edit count regularly. Also WP:1RR is a bitch, be careful, remember to start talk page threads and stay safe.--DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 13:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This editor is a **Novice Editor** and is entitled to display this **Service Badge**.

Hi Pali_Upadhyay,

I am glad to see you back editing. Take a look at the Template:Inline_cleanup_tags above. You should use it instead of reverting content that is not vandalism. Add the appropriate tag and start a talk page thread for the same. This will prevent any tripping of 1RR and blocks for edit warring. Also check out this discussion between me and ElC on other ways to avoid it. FInally Note that I have nominated the article again at Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#Citizenship_Amendment_Act_protests with credits to you. You can share your thoughts as a comment there. Feel free to discuss if you have any thoughts. regards. --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 16:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: Thank you for the help, it'll be quite useful to me and happy holidays to you. Though I'd ask you to stay around on the CAA protest page, it needs quite a lot of cleanup and vandalism is very common, 1RR doesn't make it easy. Pali Upadhyay (talk) 17:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I would have loved to but 1RR doesnt leave me the sort of leeway I am comfortable in working with. So I have no intention to join there. El C was willing to review the 1RR, so tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, you can make a comment asking him to review the 1RR. I believe that the 1RR is not really helping on this article. He clearly knows the downsides of the 1rr, So I hope he will probably lift it. if not then I guess waiting is the only option. I am around, but I wont be making reverts, or any major edits there. I will be happy to guide you if you need help though. Good work. regards. --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 18:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle

When you have time, do check out and enable WP:TWINKLE app, it helps you to edit by automating a lot of manual processing. It is not mandatory ro use but I find it very helpful.--DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 20:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

REFnames

While choosing refnames, avoid using the numbers, They are very difficult to work with. Bots add numbers as they cant think wiser. As Humans we should prefer using the publication name + title + publish date or some combination of it for the refnames. --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 11:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: Okay, I will check and organize them. Pali Upadhyay (talk) 11:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANEW

Hi there, I have referred to a comment by you here at. If you have anything to say there, you can make a comment on the thread. --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 20:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Outdent

After

making

multiple comments

Use this to WP:OUTDENT --DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 22:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Thanks. Pali Upadhyay (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Citizenship Amendment Act protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 12:53, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1RR violation at Citizenship Amendment Act protests

Please self-revert to avoid being sanctioned. El_C 12:54, 23 December 2019 (UTC)‎[reply]

Thank you for self-reverting. I appreciate it. El_C 13:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pali Upadhyay: Please review the WP:RS, WP:V, WP:OR, WP:NPOV and WP:LEAD guidelines, as that might help you appreciate edits by other editors and avoid getting in trouble with 1RR and other types of edits that are covered under discretionary sanctions notice above. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a 1RR violation again. Consider self-reverting, and not doing such repeated reverts again in that article with 1RR restrictions, while a discussion is in progress. Thank you, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for continuing to violate the one revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 14:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Hello Pali Upadhyay: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 16:29, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Pali Upadhyay, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
Abishe (talk) 06:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Pali Upadhyay. You have new messages at Talk:Citizenship_Amendment_Act_protests#Parties_in_infobox.
Message added 14:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 14:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Harshil ^{want to talk?} 17:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Pali Upadhyay. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 09:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I have added you in the credits. Please help to fix the issues pointed. Specially by Stephen. Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 09:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions applied

Because you've added multiple copyrights violations to the Citizenship Amendment Act protests article (in addition to your previous 1RR violation), you are now topic banned from editing that article, the one about the Act itself, and any other related articles, broadly construed. This is a discretionary sanction, so it is mandatory. It may be appealed here (instructions are on the page). Please do not add copyrighted material anywhere on Wikipedia, or sanctions are certain to become much more severe, including but not limited to an indefinite suspension of all editorial privileges on the project. Thank you in advance for your close attention. El_C 05:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Pali Upadhyay. You have new messages at El C's talk page.
Message added 20:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 20:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Citizenship Amendment Act protests

On 29 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Citizenship Amendment Act protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Amakuru (talk) 15:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New year

Hi there,

Wish you a very Happy New year. I hope you saw the message and the discussion on El_C s page. Conclusion is that you can appeal and get this ban lifted, after you read and confirm your familiarity with WP:COPYVIO and WP:CLOP. This should not be a reason for abandoning editing. Feel free to ask question if you have any or need any help. regards. --Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 19:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: Happy new year to you too. I haven't abandoned editing, just had a lot of other obligations to tend to. Pali Upadhyay (talk) 09:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Glad to know. --Happy New Year! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 10:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

on the page WP:AE can you see the highlighted line "Important: Appeals and administrator modifications of sanctions". Click show there. Point #1 says that you can appeal to the sanctioning admin. Please see WP:GAB on what you are expected to say in an appeal. you should explicitly mention that you have completely read and understood WP:CV and wP:CLOP. and will abide by it. requesting to lift the sanction.

Another way that will help the admin to check your understanding will be to edit other pages (other than CAA and CAA protests) adding content in your own words. If the admin finds your appeal and other contributions convincing, they will lift it. If not you can move to Forum #2 and then try it. Good luck. Happy New Year! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 11:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: I did that but I never got a reply from anyone on that page, so I don't know what to do about it. Pali Upadhyay (talk) 09:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

because you did not provide any evidence that can help the admins to judge if you have actually read those pages and understood it. The way to demonstrate this will be to edit pages not related to CAA and add content in your own words and then post those WP:Diffs on the WP:AE as examples. If they are satisfactory they will respond. As of now they are waiting for you to edit and show your understanding.--DBig Xrayᗙ 09:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 16:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]