User talk:PakistanHistorian

Welcome!

Hello, PakistanHistorian! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 17:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Vandalism warning for 24 September 2022 incident

You may be blocked from editing if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nawaz Sharif on 24 September 2022. — Toomanyyearskodakblack (talk) 13:09, 28 September 2022 (PST)

September 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maryam Nawaz, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 12:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You may be blocked from editing if you continue to violate the Neutral Point of View policy as you did at Ishaq Dar on 6 October 2022. — Toomanyyearskodakblack (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, you may be blocked from editing. Storchy (talk) 15:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 14:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Gul Panra, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Archer1234 (talk) 14:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Sino-Pakistan Agreement does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Quetta, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad Noor Meskanzai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kharan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Parliament of Pakistan, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 13:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continued disruption

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PakistanHistorian. Please note that Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and as such communication is required. Editors are expected to make a good faith effort to respond and discuss concerns as they arise, which is not happening here. Note that continued disruption will result in an indefinite block. Please address the concerns posted thus far on your talk page prior to the resumption of modifying any Wikipedia article. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:29, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and/or Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PakistanHistorian. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 20:56, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PakistanHistorian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I was blocked in November 2022 for 2 weeks for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. I was new to Wikipedia and did not really understand all of this. What I did know was that this platform was for editing articles. I may have committed something that was against Wikipedia rules. I was not able to edit so I created a new account (I did not know it was against Wikipedia's rules), the new account got banned too and I was not very happy, I thought that the old users did not want me to edit. I created so many more account, got blocked and so on. As of recently, I got to know more about all of these Wikipedia rules for sockpuppetry and realized that I broke a rule, that's why I was being targeted. What I did was wrong, I would like to request an unblock from the community on this account, that was the root. You may keep all the other sock accounts blocked. I am sorry for what happened. I wish to be a part of this community and not a criminal. Kindly unblock me and if I do commit any activity against Wikipedia's rules, you may warn me and if I don't listen you may block me too. After 14 months of this, I have realized my mistake. Kindly, look into it and help me in becoming a positive part of this community. PakistanHistorian (talk) 08:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

With your extensive history of block evasion, your only possible pathway forward is the standard offer as a show of good faith. That's not the only step required, but that's where you have to start, to show us that you are able to abide by policies. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Return to Wikipedia under Standard Offer

I, PakistanHistorian, have committed many acts deemed against Wikipedia's policies, that I have mentioned in my unblock request. I want to return to Wikipedia and have been told that the only way back to this platform starts with the "Standard offer". I have decided to take the offer and shall wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion; i.e. having made no edit, using any account or anonymously, on the English Wikipedia. I promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block and wouldn't give people reasons to object to my return. I shall, also, contribute to other WMF projects time to time in the six months, so the community can accept me back. I shall request an unblock after 14 July 2024. I hope to return back. Thank you! PakistanHistorian (talk) 11:29, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request after 7 months

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PakistanHistorian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sent my block for review on 14 January 2024 but it was denied and I was told to go through the way of the Standard offer by which I didn't disrupt the site or commit sockpuppetry. I have completed the Standard offer and aam now requesting an unblock. Thanks.

Decline reason:

You've been so massively abusive that you are now considered banned by the community, not just blocked. You need to follow the steps outlined in WP:UNBAN. And that will need a significantly more convincing justification, addressing your massively abusive behaviour stretching back years. Additionally, you need to wait six months since your last evasion; Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PakistanHistorian/Archive indicates you were evading very recently. Finally, I see no possible unblock without you proposing a significantly large WP:TOPICBAN. Yamla (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PakistanHistorian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

alright! lets talk about the WP:TOPICBAN so that I can get unblocked and all of this sockpuppetry back and fourth ends. You guys can monitor my account's edits if you like but I want to get unbanned and become a part of this community.

Decline reason:

You were just caught socking minutes ago. That sock was used to edit war. Why on earth would we unblock you when you continue to prove that you can't abide by our most basic and fundamental policies? Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You make it sound as it's the communitys fault that you can't stop socking. It was just recently that you engaged in POV pushing and socking [1] and right now there are two ongoing SPIs of you [2]. EDIT: Nvm, now there is one ongoing SPI. In other words you immediately made a unblock request after being exposed for socking again, since your sock User:TheTectonics got blocked on 20:38 and you made the unblock request at 20:46. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I know and I don't want to do it again, that's why I'm asking for an unblock through a WP:TOPICBAN, so that we can put an end to it. I am not blaming the community, I have already explained in one of my former unblock requests from a few months. What I am trying to say is that, can we workout an unblock/unban on the basis of a TOPICBAN?-- PakistanHistorian

You are asking to be unbanned so that you can "put an end to" your sockpuppetry"? You mean that you think you can't just stop the sockpuppetry of your own choice? So you reckon that you are forced into sockpuppetry by the community ban? That is what you have said, even if you didn't spell it out in such detail, and yes, that does mean that you are making out that it's the community's fault that you won't stop socking. Let's get this totally straight: It was your choice to start sockpuppetry in the first place. Each and every time you have used another sockpuppet it has been your choice to do so. If you do so yet again it will be your choice to do so. Nobody made you do it. You could have not done it in the first place, or you could have stopped at an early stage. Instead, you chose to carry on socking. Saying that you wish to be unbanned so that you can stop the sockpuppetry is total nonsense, because the ban is not forcing you to keep using sockpuppets: you are choosing to. JBW (talk) 22:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I know it was my fault. I am asking about the WP:TOPICBAN thing that would be required to get me unbanned. PakistanHistorian (talk) 08:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]