User talk:CJinoz/Archive 9

RE: Reference dates on 2010 Victorian storms

I'll keep this brief as I'm currently busy and have been all week. Australia uses DD/MM/YYYY and not the American date format of MM/DD/YYYY, although a lot of online Australian media organisations use the American format due to the software they use which of cause has been designed and made in the US or a country which uses the US format. Bidgee (talk) 08:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not querying that in the slightest. I agree that the dates should be in the dd/mm/yy format. I'm querying your edit to change all the dates. I agree with the purpose of it but it was still clearly in violation of the MOS. Read the section I quote. Just in case you do it again and someone isn't happy about it. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 08:36, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AmberCopley.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:AmberCopley.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand urban district

Template:New Zealand urban district has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. XLerate (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MissAmericaGirl

Thanks for alerting me to that user's unblock request. I went ahead and unblocked the account. See ya! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

National Sweetheart State Winners

Sorry about adding the state sweetheart winners. I didn't realize that the information wasn't supposed to be added. Sorry but thanks for letting me know. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you weren't to know! I'm sorry you got banned, glad that got sorted out :) PageantUpdater talk • contribs 01:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the tips! I didn't know about the watchlist or how to link to the Outstanding Teen state titles. Also, I didn't add that local title in the Miss Alaska USA page (it was already there..I added the note about her sister) but I will remember that in the future and not add that sort of info!! MissAmericaGirl (talk) 01:43, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haha sorry about then... well I guess now you know :) lol. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 01:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC) Let me know if you have any more questions... I follow the pageant articles pretty closely so if I spot anything else I'll let you know... just to be helpful of course![reply]

Re: Referencing

Thanks!! I wasn't sure how to reference correctly. I guess that I made a mess of that page. I will fix up the reference as soon as I have the time to figure out how to do it right. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 19:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Alabama

Thanks!! It did take some time, which is why I'm not doing some other states now. They sure have done well at Miss America! But, I will do some more when I get the chance. Thanks and I do appreciate your help. Now I know how to reference haha!! MissAmericaGirl (talk) 01:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rowspan

I didn't even realize you could sort the tables!! I was just trying to fix the pages up, sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MissAmericaGirl (talk • contribs) 02:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC) Whoops, now I'm forgetting to sign my comments!! lol - Thanks again for your help! MissAmericaGirl (talk) 02:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, CJinoz. You have new messages at Fat&Happy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

01:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: Hi!

Ok, thanks for letting me know!! I wasn't aware of that. I will remove the American beauty pageant winner categories that I put up when I get a chance. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 17:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. I will just leave that category alone until we figure it out. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 21:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hate to say this...

It's ok! It's not your fault you caught it late. I will go back and fix it. It might take a while, though. Thanks. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 02:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User: MissAmericaGirl

Hi. You seem to be following the User: MissAmericaGirl's talk page more less. I wanted to find an understanding with the user and revise my edits that s/he claimed to be vandalism. Here is the link to the user's contributions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/MissAmericaGirl.

S/he seems to be completely ignoring me and simply corrects everything without any discussions. She made the following correction http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miss_Ukraine&oldid=383540179, while writing "Changed info per source". Do you understand what that means? What source? I am very curious what source she mentioned. The contest Miss Ukraine is conducted in a concert hall therefore the prize is awarded from the audience (spectators), not all people. People's Choice sounds as a public competition involving participation of the whole population of Ukraine with some political inclination. I posted in the infobox spectators' sympathies trophy. That may sound kind of awkward, however, I do not see how that can be considered as nonconstructive compared to the preceding edit and then classified as vandalism. The user later corrected it in own way and then did the same corrections at Miss Ukraine.

Personally, it is not a big deal, however, I think it is a good gesture to discuss other opinions on the subject before conducting any changes. The most confusing is the statement about some source of which I see no traces. I never found any publications of the Ukrainian national beauty contests or any broadcasts in English and I am very curious to what source the user was referring. If the title was referred to as the People's Choice it is fine with me, however, in my opinion it is simply a generalization and should be reviewed. In my personal opinion the translation Audience Award sounds more precise than People's Choice. What is your opinion? Best regards, Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 02:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox pageant titleholder

Template:Infobox pageant titleholder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 09:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for your input....

Perhaps you can add some input here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julianna White

It seems this person wants to delete all the articles about Miss New Jersey USA titleholders. Thanks! MissAmericaGirl (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Oooooh

Thanks!! I'm glad you like it!!!! I've only done the A states so far but plan on doing them all once I get the chance. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 00:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move

You can move it back, I just wanted the redirect in place for the full name ... moving back will keep the full name as a redirect

Orphaned non-free image File:MelissaLingafelt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MelissaLingafelt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 07:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SandersMTUSA95.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SandersMTUSA95.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarah French.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarah French.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:48, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MissUSAstatedirectors.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MissUSAstatedirectors.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MissUSAplacementsperstate.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MissUSAplacementsperstate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Triple Crown (beauty pageants) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Triple Crown (beauty pageants) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple Crown (beauty pageants)(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. damiens.rf 18:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Maine USA

Oh ok, it makes sense now! Someone reverted your original fix-up and removed a bunch of stuff, so I didn't know if it was still messed up and missing info. Sorry about that! Thanks for letting me know! MissPageantNews (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Yes it did become a bit of a mess :) PageantUpdater talk • contribs 01:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template names

In terms of templates like {{Big Four Pageants titleholders 2004}}, I have merely added a year to the general template name. I am open to page moves. Are you going to move the rest of the templates at Category:Grand Slam pageant winners by country templates? I was just following the naming convention their.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I moved all the templates I created that are in Category:Big Four pageant templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:PageantUpdater/List of Miss USA, Miss Teen USA and Miss America titleholders who have appeared on reality television

Per your request on my talk page. Once you are done with it, please tag it for speedy deletion with Template:db-userreq or drop a note on my talk page and I'll delete it. postdlf (talk) 14:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Thanks

Thanks for your editorial involvement in a subject that eventually became a WP:GA:

This user helped promote Shandi Finnessey to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I'm curious about your work with Beauty Pageants.

I'd very much like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project.

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 21:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

Account activation codes have been emailed.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
The 1-year, free period begins once you enter the code.
If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 04:46, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday (2012)!

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, CJinoz!

LovelyEdit ^talk 19:29, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melissa DiGiulian

The article Melissa DiGiulian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short article and entirely trivial. Even if the subject of this article scrapes past notability by some blanket inclusion clause for minor beauty contest winners, the content of this article falls far short of being encyclopedic.

Do we really care that she likes "hanging out at the beach", or is there reason for anon IPs to be fighting cluebot over which school here mother teaches at?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a change you made to Miss RI USA entry

Hi, my name is @BoSoxFan73 on Twitter. I had added a notation that Olivia Culpo had won the Triple Crown of pageants by winning all 3 consecutive titles (Miss RI USA, Miss USA & Miss Universe); however, you recently removed the notation in your edit. May I inquire into the reasoning for the change? Is there a better way to notate this achievement in the Miss RI USA entry? Note: I am showing as an anonymous IP only because of a firewall at my place of employment. Your reply is greatly appreciated. 74.9.88.75 (talk) 01:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)@BoSoxFan73[reply]

Read WP:NOR. This was "original research". This notation hasn't been used in media or third party sources. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 01:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss USA 1953, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Russell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miss International (United States)

The article Miss International (United States) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article has been edited by COI editors, it's non-neutral and has peacock words, and has only primary source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 14:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pandora (jewelry)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pandora (jewelry), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —SMALL JIM 15:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julie Hayek, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Moonlighting, Hardball and Matlock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katherine Connors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katherine Connors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Connors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Calton | Talk 14:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carrie Lee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carrie Lee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrie Lee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lauren Grissom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Grissom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Grissom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beth Hood for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beth Hood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Hood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephanie Culberson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephanie Culberson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Culberson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Rafalowski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Rafalowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Rafalowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LauRen Merola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LauRen Merola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LauRen Merola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 06:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants

Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:PageantUpdater/List of Miss USA, Miss Teen USA and Miss America titleholders who have appeared on reality television

User:PageantUpdater/List of Miss USA, Miss Teen USA and Miss America titleholders who have appeared on reality television, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PageantUpdater/List of Miss USA, Miss Teen USA and Miss America titleholders who have appeared on reality television and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:PageantUpdater/List of Miss USA, Miss Teen USA and Miss America titleholders who have appeared on reality television during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 04:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristin George for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristin George is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin George until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tanya Lehman

The article Tanya Lehman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no significant, independent coverage in WP:RS, at most WP:BLP1E, Looks like WP:SPIP by author herself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --08:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Wuerzele (talk)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanbros titleholders

Template:Vanbros titleholders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vanbros states

Template:Vanbros states has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RPM Productions states

Template:RPM Productions states has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 21:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pageant Agency titleholders

Template:Pageant Agency titleholders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 21:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Future Productions states

Template:Future Productions states has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 21:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Greenwood Productions titleholders

Template:Greenwood Productions titleholders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 21:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 21:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss USA 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kristen Dalton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Premier Pageants states

Template:Premier Pageants states has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dravecky (talk) 06:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Tollett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Tollett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Tollett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 10:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashley Zais for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashley Zais is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Zais until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sharitha McKenzie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharitha McKenzie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharitha McKenzie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Allison Machado for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allison Machado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Machado until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jennifer Murphy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Murphy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Murphy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Tinney for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Tinney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Tinney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 08:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebecca Moore (pageant titleholder) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Moore (pageant titleholder) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Moore (pageant titleholder) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 08:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brooke Angus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brooke Angus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Angus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lizzie Rovsek

The article Lizzie Rovsek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be eligible for BLP Prod according to the creation date, but Twinkle will not allow. Anyway, BLP Prod. as completely unsourced fan site crap.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 08:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants

Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 21:19, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexis LeVan

The article Alexis LeVan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are no sources and most women who win this title do not have articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 09:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikkie Groat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikkie Groat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikkie Groat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 10:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elizabeth Carty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Carty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Carty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 10:12, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andria Mullins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andria Mullins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andria Mullins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 10:52, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christie Cole for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christie Cole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christie Cole until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 10:56, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss USA special awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss USA special awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss USA special awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katherine Connors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katherine Connors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Connors (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 02:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Ohio Teen USA for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Ohio Teen USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Ohio Teen USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 17:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lauren Scyphers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Scyphers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Scyphers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Lauren Grissom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Grissom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Grissom (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Ashley Zais for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashley Zais is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Zais (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Keena Bonella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keena Bonella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keena Bonella until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Please review WP:BLP

Please do not re-add unsourced personal information to articles. That's a violation of WP:BLP: Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. I do find those unsourced ages highly questionable, at least partly from a privacy point of view even if they are correct. Having such information without any source simply is not acceptable. If you continue to violate this core policy, I'd unfortunately have to escalate this issue. Huon (talk)

Happy to escalate the issue for you. PageantUpdater (talk) 23:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shivonn Geeb

Nomination of Shivonn Geeb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shivonn Geeb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivonn Geeb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Sarah Medley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Medley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Medley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Aleah Scheick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleah Scheick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleah Scheick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Lauren Cisneros for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Cisneros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Cisneros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Linda Louise Rowley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda Louise Rowley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Louise Rowley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Blair Chenoweth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blair Chenoweth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blair Chenoweth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Melissa Mandak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melissa Mandak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Mandak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Jeannine Phillips for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeannine Phillips is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeannine Phillips until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Melanie Mudry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melanie Mudry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Mudry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Sheena Benton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheena Benton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheena Benton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Jennifer Fairbank for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Fairbank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Fairbank until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Tina Machado for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tina Machado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Machado until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Sade Aiyeku for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sade Aiyeku is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sade Aiyeku until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Jill Gulseth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jill Gulseth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Gulseth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Mia Heaston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mia Heaston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Heaston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Joy Robinson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joy Robinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy Robinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Rachel Saunders for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Saunders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Saunders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Andrea Ciliberti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Ciliberti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Ciliberti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Kristen Johnson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristen Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristen Johnson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Cristina Nardozzi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cristina Nardozzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Nardozzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Candace Glickman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Candace Glickman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candace Glickman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Sylvia Pogorzelski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sylvia Pogorzelski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvia Pogorzelski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Jacqueline Deaner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacqueline Deaner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Deaner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Chrissa Miller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chrissa Miller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissa Miller (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Aisha Berry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aisha Berry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisha Berry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Laci Scott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laci Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laci Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Brenda Brabham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brenda Brabham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Brabham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Allison Paganetti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allison Paganetti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Paganetti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Amanda Mitteer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanda Mitteer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Mitteer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Melissa Ann Young for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melissa Ann Young is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Ann Young until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Abby Norman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abby Norman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abby Norman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Robyn Johnson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robyn Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Courtney Barnas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Courtney Barnas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Barnas (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Brittany Swann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brittany Swann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittany Swann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Michelyn Butler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michelyn Butler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelyn Butler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.