User talk:Pablo the Helper

October 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Captain America: The First Avenger have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Captain America: The First Avenger was changed by Pablo the Helper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856929 on 2022-10-31T02:41:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Driver. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm Erekret and I noticed you deleted BSL from Languages of Scotland even though it is an offical language. I am reverting it back, I am not a admin but please next time do a contructive edit. Thank You :) --Erekret

Ok, sorry, next time my edits will be more constructive, I can make some mistakes but I will learn from it and I will do my best to not making them again. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 18:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Avengers: Endgame, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. No need for "screaming notes". Fragrant Peony (talk) 15:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Cars characters, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry, that was not my intention, but sorry, sometimes I make mistakes, but they will help me to learn from them and to make them again. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 23:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Benedict Cumberbatch does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! LADY LOTUS • TALK 22:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop editing against the current consensus. The cast order for all 30 MCU films is correct as it is, and there is special consensus for Infinity War and Endgame. Please do not change it further until the discussion at WT:MCU has wrapped. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pablo the Helper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:08, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Scots. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ecuadorian ancestry Wikipedians

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Ecuadorian ancestry Wikipedians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Casting order for MCU films

Hey, there. I don't know if you are aware of this, but as per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Marvel Cinematic Universe task force#Film cast order, the MCU films have a new casting order as per the film's main titles. Hope this helps. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo, you've already been explained to and linked to the above discussion. Please stop changing the cast order. ~~It is based on the main titles, NOT the scrolling black-and-white end credits.~~ Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:20, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will keep it on mind, sorry if I made a mistake. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 01:24, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, we all make mistakes. The important thing is that we learn from them and then move on. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:31, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have another question: Main titles are more like the opening credits right? Can you explain to me further what does exactly mean "Main titles" and give me an example please. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 01:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has just occurred to me that you may be referring to the grouped actor names in the main titles, not the end crawl like I had thought. Per the discussion at WT:MCU, we are not counting those grouped credits either. But to answer your question, here is Multiverse of Madness' main title sequence. We ignore the grouped names from 1:40 until 1:47. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:20, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that’s what I meant, so can you let me restore my lasts edits, that were in articles of MCU movies? I applied what’s in the main titles. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 04:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, because like I said, we do not count the grouped names near the end of the main titles. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uh ok, understood, but what about at least I can put actors that were part of the billing poster? (Ex. in the poster of The Avengers, Clark Gregg and Cobie Smulders were part of the billing cast in the poster) And also can I put Danai Gurira in the billing cast of Avengers: Infinity War? Because she received billing, just like Anthony Mackie for Ant-Man and also as you told me this new policy seems to ignore the grouped names of the cast, so I can do what I mentioned? Pablo the Helper - To your service! 14:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:MCUFILMCAST. As Sjones23 and I have noted, the MCU taskforce has just agreed to switch from basing the cast list off of the billing block to the main titles, except for Infinity War and Endgame. I'm not sure what you're asking with regards to the grouped names. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:35, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean that this policy seems to ignore the grouped names on the main end credits, only the actors what appear individually. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 22:06, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct. Which other part of WP:MCUFILMCAST do you need further clarification? InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:13, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was asking if I can put Clark Gregg and Cobie Smulders in the billing cast of The Avengers, because they were part of the billing poster, same case as Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 where Elizabeth Debicki, Chris Sullivan and Sean Gunn were part of the billing poster, and also I was asking if I can put Danai Gurira in the full cast section in Avengers: Infinity War, because Gurira received individual billing, so apparently here it follows the policy. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 22:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current guideline doesn't allow that, but someone else has asked a similar question at WT:MCU#Film cast order. I invite you to share your input there. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary (second notice)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed a recent edit you made does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 02:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit

Hi Pablo the Helper! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Elizabeth Olsen that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. These are not minor edits either.[1][2][3] KyleJoan^talk 02:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging users as banned

Hi Pablo, I noticed this edit, and have reverted it. I don't believe that the editor in question is banned, but I could be mistaken. Could you please point me to the AN discussion, arbitration case, or other location that the ban was enacted? SQL ^{Query Me!} 20:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ups, sorry my pal, I did it because to visibly put that those users are blocked, I discovered it by casually. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 20:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo - there's a difference between "banned" and "blocked", they are not the same thing. That account is was blocked, not banned. ButlerBlog (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. Sorry about that. One thing, please support me, it's not what it seems. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 22:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pablo the Helper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You're making a mistake, I'm not that user, neither Lil Pablo. I casually discovered the user TheEncyclopediaReader and I saw that it was blocked but it wasn't in display so I putted that he's blocked that’s all, I swear that I'm not that user. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 20:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obvious sock of User:Lil Pablo 2007. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Some more digging indicates that this goes back to Lil Pablo 2007. CUs can find some notes on cuwiki. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:08, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Cuwiki? What do you mean with that? where do you get that supposed info from? I'm not neither Lil Pablo or TheEncyclopediaReader. Pablo the Helper - To your service! 21:11, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CUWiki is a private wiki used by Checkusers.
You and TheEncyclopediaReader have a large amount of overlap. There is technical similarity as well. SQL^{Query Me!} 21:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So, if I'm understanding the situation correctly:
You and TheEncyclopediaReader both edit from the same very small, very specific network.

You and TheEncyclopediaReader both edit a lot of the same articles here, and on other wikis.

You "just found" TheEncyclopediaReader completely out of nowhere, and tagged them as banned / locked.

You started editing as soon as the TheEncyclopediaReader account aged to 6 months from last edit - when CU data would go stale.
Certainly, you can understand where it looks to us like you are the same person behind both accounts, no? SQL ^{Query Me!} 23:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilson Fisk (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DecafPotato was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kingpin (character) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per the local consensus of the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force at WP:MCUCHARACTERS, the character must have two more non-cameo roles. Per the previous two declines, the character still needs two more appearances.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wilson Fisk (Marvel Cinematic Universe) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DecafPotato (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pablo the Helper! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DecafPotato (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]