User talk:Pablo Cepeda-Salas

February 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to AS Adema have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: AS Adema was changed by Pablo Cepeda-Salas (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870817 on 2023-02-25T17:21:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2017 China Cup Final moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2017 China Cup Final. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerked here a typoed talk page. Skynxnex (talk) 15:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2017 China Cup final moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2017 China Cup final. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and no categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my reliable source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOFsnTl-Eig check the description Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copa Ciudad de Valparaíso moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Copa Ciudad de Valparaíso. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 01:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Copa Ciudad de Valparaíso (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Copa Ciudad de Valparaíso and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 13:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my reliable source https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copa_Ciudad_de_Valpara%C3%ADso Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 02:19, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pablo Cepeda-Salas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi Pablo Cepeda-Salas. Please do not edit a football player's current team (as you did with Kylian Mbappé) without providing a reliable source to verify your edit. In this case, unless and until a transfer for Mbappé is announced, please do not change his current club on the article. WJ94 (talk) 21:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2017 China Cup final (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2017 China Cup final and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOFsnTl-Eig that's my reliable resource check the description of the video Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 16:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2017 China Cup final (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2017 China Cup final and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Copa Ciudad de Valparaíso (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Copa Ciudad de Valparaíso and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:53, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Marcelino Núñez

added a link pointing to Concepción

Rodrigo Echeverría

added a link pointing to Concepción

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marcelino Núñez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concepción.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2017 China Cup Final

Hello, Pablo Cepeda-Salas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2017 China Cup Final, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Harry Kane, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Ermen Benítez article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 18:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Conor Gallagher, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look up 2023 Florida Cup you'll see that Conor Gallagher is in the lineup, as a matter of a fact he scored in the final Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Josué (footballer, born 1979). Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 15:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Arturo Vidal, you may be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 12:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Eduardo Vargas. --Jaellee (talk) 21:42, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been right on some editing not all of them were misleading or threatening Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 23:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The vast majority of your edits have been reverted. There is a wall of messages and warnings above with no response and obviously no change in behavior. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 00:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

not all of the edits are misleading Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 00:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2017 China Cup final

Hello, Pablo Cepeda-Salas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2017 China Cup final".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Copa Ciudad de Valparaíso

Hello, Pablo Cepeda-Salas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Copa Ciudad de Valparaíso".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pablo Cepeda-Salas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look I am very sorry for vandalizing all of these wikipedia pages, I was doing it without thinking things through. I did it because I thought things incorrectly and not researching things correctly. I promise next time I will never vandalize any wikipedia page because I learned my lesson this time to never vandalize any wikipedia pages.

Decline reason:

pending further discussion of block evasion. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you mean Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please describe what constructive edits you would make were we to unblock you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add achievements to footballers and add their apps and goals, and I would remove any vandalized parts on pages Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 22:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: Is this sufficient for unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra I think it's somewhat academic as Yamla has tagged their user page for socking effectively making this a check user block. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no further sockpuppetry other than Olimpia de Minas, but I think this user should stay far away from footballers, given their problems in that subject area. --Yamla (talk) 09:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a big "other". Recent block evasion precludes unblocking. I think this nice overlap requires explanation. Willing to keep an open mind, but will decline this one. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how long will I be blocked for? Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 01:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are currently blocked indefinitely. I suggest you wait a minimum of 6 months and then consider filing an unblock request per the standard offer. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And don't evade your block by creating new accounts and/or editing logged out. Every time you do that, you worsen your situation. I was all set to unblock you, and you had already ruined it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been 6 months! Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright I'll come back in 6 months Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been 6 months! Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Pablo Cepeda-Salas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been 6 months now and I was told to request again for my unblock so here I am again requesting for an unblock. I will NOT disruptively edit wikipedia pages with misleading information, I will make sure to reference the things I add to wikipedia pages, any misleading information on other pages I will make sure to remove that misleading information and I will make sure to fix my mistakes and do better next time, thanks for your time and have a good day.

Accept reason:

I am, tentatively and based on no recent block evasion, accepting this request. Please consider staying away from footballers articles, at least at the start - these are what caused you issues in the first place. Please heed warnings that people send you, and reply on talk pages when prompted to do so (such as all the warnings above, which you ignored). This is kind of a 'last chance' and I or any other administrator will re-block you if you continue to create issues like you did before your block. Welcome back, but please edit carefully. Daniel (talk) 02:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel first off I want to thank you for unblocking me I really appreciate it, and I'm wondering for how long can I not edit on footballer articles for? Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 13:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No specific time, this isn't a formal restriction but more some general guidance to help you out - maybe for a month or two, while you get back to normal editing? Daniel (talk) 13:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel alright works fine with me! Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No checkuser technical indication of any recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 22:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 04:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla so will I be able to edit now? Pablo Cepeda-Salas (talk) 02:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock request has not yet proven sufficiently convincing for anyone to review it. You remain blocked. --Yamla (talk) 20:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]