User talk:Pablito064

1993 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1993 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Hello! Please read the Wikipedia rules WP:NTENNIS. It says that "More detailed tennis notability information can be found at WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines". When you read WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines, it says that

"Notable tournaments include the WTA Premier tournaments (including qualifications), WTA International tournaments (including qualifications) and WTA 125K series. From 2008 onwards the ITF Women's $50,000–$100,000+ tournaments are notable. From 1978–2007 the threshold for notability in the women's ITF circuit is a $25,000 event. Qualification tournaments in ITF women's events are not notable. Qualification draws for WTA main tour should be placed near the bottom of the main draw page. Lesser tournaments may be listed in List of ITF Women's Circuit events and brief information provided there, and redirects from tournament names to that list may be created.

Exhibition tournaments should establish their notability on other grounds (e.g. several top 10 players present, notability in history, significant media coverage,... etc.).

When naming the new tournament page try to avoid the indication of sponsorship in the title and focus on the commonly accepted/known name of the tournament (which generally refers to the place where it's held or a famous person that it is named after, though sometimes it is inevitable).."

Therefore, according to the Wikipedia rules, WTA Tour Championships automatically satisfy the general notability guideline. Please read the Wikipedia rules carefully before disappointing active Wikiepedia editors. PE fans (talk) 04:12, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PE fans Greeting to you. I did not say the subject is not notable. I am saying, the sources need to be reliable secondary sources with significant coverage. If anything is not clear pls visit Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1994 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1994 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Doubles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Doubles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Singles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Singles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move article to draft page

Hi Pablitto64, Greetings to you. What we need are independent, reliable sources (secondary sources) that the sources talk about the subject in depth and in length and not merely passing mentioned. The sources need to inline citate - pls check referencing for beginner on on inline citation. (note: sources from home page, marketing/press releases, user generated content sites and etc are considered primary sources and can NOT be used to demonstrate the notability of the subject). Pls click the links for further info of the rejection (note: article needs significant coverage and one or two sources are not considered significant - pls provide at least 3 and resubmit). If you have further questions pls refer to Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Also, one of the Wikipedia's 5 fundamental principles is Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility, so kindly refrain yourself of posting such edit on my talk page - By the way, sources can be in any languages. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pablitto64, don't worry. I support you! It is clear that most tennis articles were significantly covered in the newspapers when the tournaments were held. After 40 years, most of them were deleted. Fortunately, it is still possible to find a small portion of them from, for example, New York Times archives. PE fans (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PE fans, Greetings to you. If you could find info from New York Times or any major newspapers, you are welcome to add in the sources. Let me know you have done so, so I may review them. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Hello! I've added New York Times reference to Draft:1993 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles, Draft:1994 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles, Draft:1979 US Open – Mixed Doubles and submitted them for review. On the other hands, I've submitted Draft:1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Singles, Draft:1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Doubles, Draft:1993 Bank of the West Classic – Singles, Draft:1995 US Open – Men's Doubles Qualifying without providing any secondary sources.

I understand that you are a new reviewer and may not be familiar with Wikipedia rules, especially in the situation that Wikipeida rules Wikipedia:Notability (sports) said that "The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline or the sport specific criteria set forth below". In other words, for the sports articles, the notability guideline is different from other articles. For example, please read the "Notability" section of [1] and "Data sources" section of [2].

According to Wikipedia rules, [3], those without any secondary sources like New York Times are considered as "very-bad-quality articles" and therefore fall into the Stub-Class category. The guideline for dealing with Stub-Class articles is the following: "The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether." Thank you for understanding us PE fans (talk) 14:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PE fans I understand each sport specific notability (SSN) is different. The point is Wikipedia is an encyopedia and content need to be verify and notability needs to be support by significant coverage by media/sources which are independent, reliable (secondary reliable sources) . Any sources associated with the subject are considered not primary sources which is not independent from the subject. Pls see primary sources vs secondary - WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY and Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. I suggest the draft articles would easily be put back to the main article as it is so short and not significant enough to Wikipedia:Content forking. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 19:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: In WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY, it says the following: "Unless restricted by another policy, primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source." Therefore, the guideline for general articles does not rule out the usage of primary sources.

For tennis articles within the Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis, the following primary sources are recommended by[4]: ATPWorldTour.com, WTA Tour, Australian Open, Wimbledon Championships, Roland Garros, TennisForum website, ITFtennis It is not necessary for tennis articles to have the secondary sources.

As for the Wikipedia:Content forking problem, the Wikipedia rules [5] says the following: "Women: Notable tournaments include the WTA Premier tournaments (including qualifications), WTA International tournaments (including qualifications) and WTA 125K series. From 2008 onwards the ITF Women's $50,000–$100,000+ tournaments are notable. From 1978–2007 the threshold for notability in the women's ITF circuit is a $25,000 event. Qualification tournaments in ITF women's events are not notable. Qualification draws for WTA main tour should be placed near the bottom of the main draw page. Lesser tournaments may be listed in List of ITF Women's Circuit events and brief information provided there, and redirects from tournament names to that list may be created. Exhibition tournaments should establish their notability on other grounds (e.g. several top 10 players present, notability in history, significant media coverage,... etc.). When naming the new tournament page try to avoid the indication of sponsorship in the title and focus on the commonly accepted/known name of the tournament (which generally refers to the place where it's held or a famous person that it is named after, though sometimes it is inevitable)." In other words, Draft:1993 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles, Draft:1994 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles, Draft:1979 US Open – Mixed Doubles, Draft:1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Singles, Draft:1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Doubles, Draft:1993 Bank of the West Classic – Singles should exists as a single article, while Draft:1995 US Open – Men's Doubles Qualifying may be put back to the main article.

Wikipedia has many rules and we are all learning them. In this process, please forgive each others for making mistakes. For example, according to the guidelines, I've put the Draft:1995 US Open – Men's Doubles Qualifying on the bottom of 1995 US Open – Men's Doubles and I would suggest you to delete Draft:1995 US Open – Men's Doubles Qualifying. On the other hands, still according to the guidelines, I would suggest you to accept Draft:1993 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles, Draft:1994 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles, Draft:1979 US Open – Mixed Doubles, Draft:1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Singles, Draft:1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Doubles, Draft:1993 Bank of the West Classic – Singles as single articles. Thank you!PE fans (talk) 03:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PE fans Hi Greetings to you. Primary sources can be included in an article but since they are not independent that can not demonstrate the notability of the subject. In addition as I have mentioned, the subject content not short and not significant, it should be merged into the main article. That is no a good reason to Wikipedia:Content forking them. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Hello! I emphasize again that the general notability criterion does not apply to tennis articles because Wikipedia:Notability (sports) says "The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline or the sport specific criteria set forth below" It is or not and.

On the other hands, whether the article contains the secondary sources do affect the assessment of tennis articles according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis. Roughly speaking, the articles without secondary sources are considers very-bad-quality articles and are Stub-Class. Articles with one secondary sources are considered Start-Class. Articles with more than one secondary sources are considered C-Class. Currently, half of the tennis articles are Stub-Class. Do you want to delete all of them? PE fans (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PE fans Merge them to main article and not fork them - Wikipedia:Content forking. SSN dosnt not superseded GNG (I wish it does actually where there are many players have articles in Wikipedia but they do not pass SNN requirements and even the player fall under SSN requirements the article still need multiple independent, reliable sources) and I have mentioned multiple times, and pointed to you the link on significant coverage - not one or two sources, especially not only primary sources. -pls see - Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Remark that in Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis, there are 39932 articles. 20383 of them does not have the secondary sources at all but meets the SSN. 9802 of them has only one secondary source. Most of them are fork pages like 1979 US Open- Mixed Double. For example, the 1979 US Open article already have Men’s Single, Women’s Single, Men’s Double, Women’s Double pages. In conclusion, if you completely ignore SSN, then almost all tennis articles must be merged with the upper level articles. I don’t think it make sense at all. On the other hands, it is extremely strange if Men’s single has its own page but Mixed double does not. Moreover, the scope of the Grand Slam sub program is to have an individual page for each draw. Since your current reply has significantly threaten the existence of a big Wikipedia project, I hope that you can follow the SSN and save the Wikipedia from extinction.PE fans (talk) 05:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PE fans There are thousands of articles in Wikipedia which should not have pages - see Wikipedia:Other stuff exists and many articles should not fork actually. Merge and not fork. I have stated my comments and repeated them and hope you have read the links for no point for me to restated them again. thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pablito064. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New comments

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:1978 Virginia Slims of Philadelphia – Singles. Thanks! JC7V (talk) 05:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1993 Australian Open – Women's Singles Qualifying

Hello, Pablito064,

Thanks for creating 1993 Australian Open – Women's Singles Qualifying! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 1 issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1990 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles

Hello, Pablito064,

Thanks for creating 1990 WTA Tour Championships – Doubles! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 09:08, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1996 Australian Open – Women's Singles Qualifying moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1996 Australian Open – Women's Singles Qualifying, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1992 Lipton International Players Championships – Women's Doubles

Hello, Pablito064,

Thanks for creating 1992 Lipton International Players Championships – Women's Doubles! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Guangzhou International Women's Open – Singles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2006 Guangzhou International Women's Open – Singles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2006 Guangzhou International Women's Open – Singles has been accepted

2006 Guangzhou International Women's Open – Singles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Iffy★Chat -- 09:27, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1988 Mercedes Cup – Singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonas Svensson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did the tennis work for ya!

The title suggests what I'm supposed to put here | 2000 Volvo Women's Open – Singles | 66.206.231.45 (talk) 16:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1999 Mercedes-Benz Cup – Doubles

Hello, Pablito064,

Thank you for creating 1999 Mercedes-Benz Cup – Doubles.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Somewhere in the lead you could mention that the sport is tennis, as uninformed readers (like me) won't know without looking at reference or category

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 14:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1988 Swatch Open – Singles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1988 Swatch Open – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 14:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1988 Bordeaux Open – Singles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1988 Bordeaux Open – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 14:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tournament draw generator

Hi Pablito, I noticed your great work adding many draw articles for older years' tournaments. I created a tool a while back that automatically generates the wikitext for the draws from the ITF's website, which might make things a lot quicker for you. How it works is you navigate to the relevant tournament on the ITF's website, e.g. the page for 2020 Italian Open is here. Then, you select the event (singles/doubles, main draw/qualifying) and click "Print". This takes you to an html draw, e.g. [6]. You then paste the URL for this draw into the "Tournament link" field on my tool, select the other options as necessary, and click "Request". The tool then generates the draw in a minute or less, which you can then copy and paste into the Wikipedia article. A user on the German Wikipedia focusing on Challenger tournaments has used this tool to make around 2000 draw articles in the past 9 months, which shows how efficient you can get with it. The only issue is that the algorithm doesn't always get the name links perfect, but you can add corrections to this page and the tool will get them right from then on. The tool hasn't been used much on the English Wikipedia yet, so there might be a few initial hiccups to get things working perfectly, but once they're overcome, it'll be smooth sailing from then on. If you do choose to give it a try, I'd like to hear the outcome! Regards, —Somnifuguist (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1988 Swatch Open – Singles has been accepted

1988 Swatch Open – Singles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1988 Bordeaux Open – Singles has been accepted

1988 Bordeaux Open – Singles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 09:38, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1993 Copenhagen Open – Singles (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wingwatchers was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Relied oo much on single source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1993 Copenhagen Open – Singles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1993 Copenhagen Open – Singles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 04:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pablito064! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wingwatchers (talk) 04:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1993 Copenhagen Open – Singles (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

At least stating what sport the article is about would be helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1993 Copenhagen Open – Singles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1993 Copenhagen Open – Singles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1993 Copenhagen Open – Doubles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1993 Copenhagen Open – Doubles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. || Orbit Wharf ^💬 02:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1993 Copenhagen Open – Singles has been accepted

1993 Copenhagen Open – Singles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 10:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1993 Copenhagen Open – Doubles has been accepted

1993 Copenhagen Open – Doubles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 14:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Pablito064, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Muboshgu (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005–06 Real Madrid CF season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santiago Bernabéu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions

@Pablito064, I would like to personally thank you for your tireless and diligent work in making the tennis draws on a daily basis. You have spared me a lot of extra work and for that I thank you. Yours sincerely, Qwerty284651 (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late response. I appreciate your words. Pablito064 (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1997 Romanian Open – Singles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1997 Romanian Open – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Schwede 66 22:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1995 Campionati Internazionali di San Marino – Singles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1995 Campionati Internazionali di San Marino – Singles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Schwede 66 22:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1995 Campionati Internazionali di San Marino – Singles has been accepted

1995 Campionati Internazionali di San Marino – Singles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Iffy★Chat -- 11:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- --> The comment the reviewer left was:

Pbritti (talk) 02:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2004 Copa Petrobras Santiago – Singles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2004 Copa Petrobras Santiago – Singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Copa Petrobras Santiago – Singles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 06:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roger Federer's early career, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]