User talk:PRwrestlinganalyst

Re 2

Nothing personal, but I would appreciate if not erase my edits on the career of John Jesus Yurnet, as I said nothing personal, we can work to improve it, btw the photo was property of Mr 450 and i upload it giving him credit for it NoelCruz (talk) 12:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)talk[reply]

Re

Si lo de la movida de Mr 450 "Final Flash" que es un brainbuster el lo llama asi desde que adopto el gymmick que tiene de "Saiyan Prince" al igual que varias movidas si tienes Instagram buscalocomo Saiyan Prince 450 y veras todos los nombres que el le tiene a sus movidas excepto el 450 splash al igual que Ray Gonzalez que esta lesionado hasta lo que queda de año Saludos NoelCruz (talk) 18:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC) talk[reply]

Saludos

Veo que estas haciendo "mejoras" alguna ediciones que he hecho de varios luchadore (Ejemplo: Chris Angel) que puse de que esta inactivo desde el 2014 ya que tuve la oportunidad de hablar con el y el mismo me lo dijo, digue practicando pero no esta activo al menos por ahora en cuanto a lo de Ray gonzales y WWC aclaro que esta lesionado ya que estara tiempo largo fuera por ende lo edito asi y Mr 450 estara solo por ocasiones ya que son fechas que el esta libre no me esta malo pero puedo darte info de eso saludos lo hago para evitar conflictos en wikipedia NoelCruz (talk) 15:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC) NoelCruz (talk)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, PRwrestlinganalyst, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jay Fox (wrestler), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WWGB (talk) 05:47, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jay Fox (wrestler)

The article Jay Fox (wrestler) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 05:47, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

wrestling

Buenas tardes. Como veo que es de puerto rico, le hablo en español. Si por lo que sea prefiere hablar en inglés, hablamos en inglés. Ultimamente, estoy viendo los artículos de lucha libre en PR (tema en el que soy un negado total) y me gustaría arreglar algunos artículos. El problema es que no es un tema muy extendido y muchísimos artículos están desactualizados y faltan referencias por doquier. Un tema que he visto, el campeonato IC de la IWA. En principio, por lo que leo, la IWA cerró sus puertas, pero el título cambió de manos en otra promoción. En principio, el cambio sería legítimo, ya que hay muchos otros títulos que son usados por otras empresas. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Angel esta inactivo desde el 2013 fue anunciado para una lucha en parejas junto a escobar en WWL pero no participo por eso puse inactivo NoelCruz (talk) 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)NoelCruz (talk)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jay Fox (wrestler)

The article Jay Fox (wrestler) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas tardes. De nuevo, viendo que es booker de la IWA, si no es molestia, le hablaré en español, para expresarme mejor. Si no, traduciré al inglés. El problema con Fox es que no hay referencias de él. Wikipedia funciona así, si hay referencias que avalen su relevancia, se crea un artículo. Un luchador del que no aparecen registros, sintiéndolo mucho, no es relevante ni notable. De hecho, es que no encuentro NADA del tal Jay Fox en internet y la r de datos en bases como las que dije, casi indican que este luchador no existe. En todo caso, no es relevante. Sobre el título IWA, lo mismo. Sintiéndolo mucho, no hay referencias de que el tal Fox (si es que existe) haya luchado bajo ese nombre ni que haya ganado ese título. Su palabra de ex booker de IWA, creo que no sirve, pues no puede probarse que en efecto, sea quien dice ser. Espero haberme explicado. Un saludo --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. The problem with Fox article is we haven't sources about him. That's how Wikipedia works; If we have sources to proof his notability, we create an article. A wrestler with no data isn't notable. In fact, I found NOTHING about him in the Internet and the lack of sources almost indicate the wrestlers doesn't exist. Anyway, he isn't notable. About the IWA title, same case. We haven't sources about Fox (if he exist) had wrestled under that name and won the title. I think your word as former IWA booker isn't enough, because we can't proof you are a former IWA booker. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

Where is this consensus that was reached??? Every other winner of the Royal Rumble doesn't say winner next too it..... It's the Event Royal Rumble along with the year example Royal Rumble (2015) if it's under the wrestlers accomplishments it is too be understood that they have won that years rumble or what ever is under the wrestlers accomplishments the same has gone for the King of the Ring.... So if there is anyway you can prove this "consensus" then maybe the edits won't be undone JMichael22 (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miz

Cut the shit, son. Stop reverting the changes before you are reported to the admins. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 22:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong with what i'm doing. There's no need to delete the picture as even featured wrestling articles have multiple pictures in the championship segment. And no need for your wannabe though guy attitude. PRwrestlinganalyst (talk) 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please read WP:V

I removed your additions to Roman Reigns signature move list because there were no sources. WP:V (a core content policy) says that Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be replaced without an inline citation to a reliable source. For reliable sources for professional wrestling, look here. For signature moves of wrestlers, you either need four sources saying he performed that move in four different matches, or just one, if the source explicitly says that it is a signature. If you don't know how to source, or how to use cite web, feel free to ask me. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 08:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soures say the superman punch is a " jumping, cross-body right hand delivered with phenomenal impact"... no sources about Reigns performs a MMA Superman Punch. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WT:PW Discussion

You're invited to participate in the discussion Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#Signature move sourcing. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 00:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

From the style guide

"What to include in the notes section for each reign:

If the new champion defeated someone other than the old champion. If the new champion received the title outside the match. Match types that weren't straight one-on-one. When the title was vacated. What NOT to include in the notes section for each reign:

What move they used to win. Who interfered. Title defenses, unless it relates to how the title was vacated."

Non scheuled matches aren't notable. If a stable attacked other wrestler isn't notable. We never include in other titles, like the WWE Title or the IC Title. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Your recent editing history at Kazuchika Okada shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dwpaul ^Talk 17:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okada

I have never claimed to be right about the move, only about what the source says. That's how it is here. I don't like certain rules on Wikipedia, but none of us have to be here. By being here, we agree to follow those rules or suffer the consequences. If you can find four reliable sources (not YouTube videos) that say "STO", we could add it to the list. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 22:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WWL World Trios Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WWL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WWL

Hi. I readed WWL is folded because Negrín retired from wrestling. The facebook includes some tombstones photos and the website is down. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 01:35, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Maybe, It was storyline. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sheamus, you may be blocked from editing. I have no idea why you decided to revert my restoration of a reliable source, but don't do it again. NiciVampireHeart 06:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not kidding. Why on earth would I be kidding? You removed a source and restored jargon. That's disruptive. Therefore, I warned you for being disruptive. That's how it works. NiciVampireHeart 07:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kofi Kingston

Why would you undo my contribution and not even add anything of your own? Kofi turning heel is a major enough moment to deserve recognition on his page so don't do it again... — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordVacation (talk • contribs) 04:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No duh it's unsourced you edited it before RAW was even over and before they put it on the site, why don't you take your own advice because guess what? You don't own any of the pages so what you feel is notable enough doesn't matter. His alignment is changed for the first time in his career and that isn't notable? You shouldn't be editing pages, clearly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordVacation (talk • contribs) 12:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mr 450

Por favor deten ya el disruptive editing Estoy poniendo bien las cosas y la foto es de mi autoria no se el por que editas y la borras, si ves algun error solo arreglalo y ya no hay necesidad de borrarla, es un luchador super activo, y estoy pendiente a su carrera que el va como dije nada personal pero desde que puse los titulos que ha ganado y editado los sitios que ha ido algunos datos de su carrera lo que han hecho es borrarlo ¿por que? si no lo hago a mal, al contrario NoelCruz (talk) 17:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)talk[reply]

Thanks

Hey its Wwemeowmeow here you Added my info Back onto brock Lesnar thanks mate i don't know why someone would delete that info but thanks mate appreciate it Wwemeowmeow (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cesaro

yes, the matches he won from 2012-2014, but not in 2015, he has only used it once and he didnt even win that match, hence the "thereafter".)

Because he has been in a tag team for almost all of 2015, where most of the matches were won by Kidd or by a sequence of other moves. The fact that he used the Neutralizer as a finisher against Cena in his one high-profile match of the year shows that it is still his finishing move. Though technically that may be "rarely used," it does not take context into account, especially since it does not offer up another finishing maneuver that he is using in place of the Neutralizer. After the match with Cena, it's safe to say it is his finisher still. Sherick (talk) 20:53, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lucha libre de Puerto Rico

Saludos, probablemente no tengas idea de quien soy, pero antes de que Noel y tu empezaran a editar yo trabaje con estas páginas. Ahora que somos varios usuarios con conocimiento de la lucha en PR, creo que podemos crear un proyecto para subir algunas páginas a un mejor estatus. He visto que ustedes han tenido algunas diferencias, pero yo estoy dispuesto a trabajar con los problemas de traducción que surgan si la información es de beneficio para el artículo. Lo que hace falta es poder coordinarnos. Creo que my "talk page" es un buen sitio para establecer un plan y quizás limar cualquier aspereza que exista entre ustedes. El Alternativo (talk) 08:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Seth Rollins. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I know you are aware that edit-warring is disruptive, I have blocked you for 24 hours so you can cool off on this Seth Rollins thing. It's absolutely mind-boggling that neither of you opted to open a discussion on the article's talk page and instead decided to flimsily discuss via edit summaries. What's even more mind-boggling, is that you were clearly thinking about doing this! The moment that you find resistance from another editor about a piece of information, that's your clue to open a discussion ASAP. There is asbolutely no reason why a piece of data, even if incorrect, couldn't remain in the article until the dispute is resolved. Wikipedia has no deadline. Edit-warring is not only disruptive to the article, it's also extraordinarily irritating to people who have the article watchlisted. Busy editors do not want to see their watchlist blow up with childish revert wars. I have protected the article for 48 hours. When your block expires in 24, my recommendation is that the first thing you do is open a discussion on the article's talk page. Good luck, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Owens. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vjmlhds 14:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

WWE and NXT

Basically the result in a no contest and everything stays as it were, list them separately sense there is no established clear consensus.--WillC 09:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Report him if he breaks 3RR. That is about it. Discuss and watch.--WillC 04:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

	Hi
	Can you tell me WTF is a "High Angle" Crossface? MiSu Cold (talk) 12:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hola una pregunta

Hola una pregunta

Hola, suponiendo que hablas español hago una pregunta, por que en el articulo de Kevin Owens, en la parte de In Wrestling cambiaste las cosas que yo edite y eliminaste los dos moves que puse, el 450 splash y el Double knee facebreaker que ademas tenian fuente y todo? Dejalo como estaba, no tenias por que cambiar y eliminar las cosas que puse para mejorar esa parte del articulo, es muy molesto que uno se tome el tiempo para editar un articulo para mejorarlo y que vos vengas de la nada a eliminar por que si. Si edito un articulo es para mejorarlo, no empeorarlo. MiSu Cold (talk) 08:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PRwrestlinganalyst. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PRwrestlinganalyst. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PRwrestlinganalyst. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]