User talk:PRANN-DAIWAN

May 2019

Hello, I'm 94rain. An edit that you recently made to Dashavatara seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 94rain ^Talk 12:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Dashavatara

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Dashavatara article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! PATH SLOPU 14:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Introduction, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 14:59, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PRANN-DAIWAN, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PRANN-DAIWAN! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:14, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

DS-alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

May 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dashavatara. S. Salim (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dashavatara. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:30, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please block

@Doug Weller and Bishonen: could you please block this editor for unconstructive editing? See Dashavatara: Revision history. Thanks. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]