User talk:Owenrose1021

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, Owenrose1021, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process – at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 20:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Tom Brady, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please take a look at Help:Infobox picture and see how to correctly format images for infoboxes. If that's tl;dr for you, quick tip: don't use the File: prefix or the "thumb" parameter in the infobox. Infobox images are automatically formatted.

See how your edit looks with the broken caption text and the extraneous frame around the image, vs how it's supposed to look. You can see how the code is entered:

{{Infobox NFL biography
| image = Tom Brady WFT-Buccaneers NOV2021 (cropped).jpg
| alt = Brady with the Buccaneers in 2021
| caption = Brady with the [[Tampa Bay Buccaneers]] in 2021

Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rob Gronkowski, you may be blocked from editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for letting me know. I am very new to Wikipedia editing. Could you please give me some advice for the future? Owenrose1021 (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Trevor Lawrence with the Jaguars in 2021.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Trevor Lawrence with the Jaguars in 2021.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trevor Lawrence with the Jaguars in 2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trevor Lawrence with the Jaguars in 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images of living people

As a general rule, we can't use non-free images of living people in their articles, and particularly not in infoboxes. I have just reverted your edits to Zach Wilson. You added a non-free image that you claim was the subject of significant commentary, but I see no discussion of that picture in the article. Please make sure that any use of non-free images complies with WP:NFCC. —C.Fred (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have had to revert your edits to Justin Fields for the same reason. —C.Fred (talk) 22:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for letting me know about this. I am trying to get up-to-date pictures of football players without trying to get copyrighted, is there anyway I can get some help form you? Owenrose1021 (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Every picture you have uploaded today is copyrighted and under a non-free license. —C.Fred (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I know they are copyrighted? Owenrose1021 (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you acknowledged they were all non-free when you uploaded them. Quite simply, if you take it from somebody else's website, and there's nothing that clearly states it's free to use, then it's copyrighted and under an all-rights-reserved license. That definitely includes Sports Illustrated and similar websites, as well as team websites and nfl.com. —C.Fred (talk) 22:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. Are Flickr and Getty Images free images? Owenrose1021 (talk) 22:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getty Images are not. Flickr, it depends: you can usually find the license information along with the page. If you find one, ping me and put the link here, and I'll check the license for you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/112233269@N03/51924204115/

Image of Matt Stafford. Owenrose1021 (talk) 00:05, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not usable. As stated, it has an all-rights-reserved license. —C.Fred (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Fields with the Bears.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Fields with the Bears.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Zach Wilson - Jets.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Zach Wilson - Jets.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Trevor Lawrence with the Jaguars in 2021.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Trevor Lawrence with the Jaguars in 2021.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Peyton Manning in the Colts in 2011.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Peyton Manning in the Colts in 2011.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Matthew Stafford in the Rams.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Matthew Stafford in the Rams.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know all of these edits that I have made. I will not do it anymore. Owenrose1021 (talk) 02:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Andy Dalton with the Bears in 2021.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Andy Dalton with the Bears in 2021.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sam Darnold with Panthers.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sam Darnold with Panthers.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jonathan Taylor from the Colts.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jonathan Taylor from the Colts.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox images changes

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Myles Kennedy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please seek consensus for all these image changes - FlightTime (open channel) 02:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at DanTDM. [Stop changing images without any discussions - FlightTime (open channel) 02:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FlightTime, I am sorry for my editing. I am very new here, and I want to make Wikipedia more up-to-date, now I understand about copyrights, etc. Owenrose1021 (talk) 02:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make it up to date you shouldn't be changing recent pictures of players in their infoboxes to ones that are 5+ years older. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand my ban till futher notice. The reason I did the last one, because on the google images, it said "licencable" on the images. I must have misunderstood it. Sorry again. Owenrose1021 (talk) 00:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have understood my ban, and I now realize the consequences of my actions. How long would I be blocked from editing? Owenrose1021 (talk) 00:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can submit an unblock request using the instructions above. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 01:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I now know the purpose of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. In which, that is what most of Wikipedia's text and images come from, that license. I now have seen and looked at how Wikipedia is licensed. I cannot reuse any text nor images. Now, I have seen that I cannot screenshot, scan, or not do anything with and image that is copyrighted. If I could use an image that is copyrighted, it has to be under fair use, otherwise, you cannot do anything to it. However, I now know that if you do upload an image, you can upload one that you made entirely yourself like animals and plants. I will never use any images with copyright licensing again. Owenrose1021 (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I now know the purpose of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. In which, that is what most of Wikipedia's text and images come from, that license. I now have seen and looked at how Wikipedia is licensed. I cannot reuse any text nor images. Now, I have seen that I cannot screenshot, scan, or not do anything with and image that is copyrighted. If I could use an image that is copyrighted, it has to be under fair use, otherwise, you cannot do anything to it. However, I now know that if you do upload an image, you can upload one that you made entirely yourself like animals and plants. I will never use any images with copyright licensing again. Owenrose1021 (talk) 16:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|This account got blocked a while ago, because of copyrighting, and I continued with copyrighting on another account. Which means I was evading my block. This block will not be necessary anymore because I have now learned from my bad decisions. I am not even going to edit Wikipedia anymore, because it is not worth getting into more trouble on this site. I have understood that I should have gotten blocked, because copyright infringement put Wikipedia, as a whole, in legal jeopardy. I have proven many times that I would not stop copyrighting, but now, I am going to stop. If it is alright, I would like to have this account unblocked. Owenrose1021 (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|This account got blocked a while ago, because of copyrighting, and I continued with copyrighting on another account. Which means I was evading my block. This block will not be necessary anymore because I have now learned from my bad decisions. I am not even going to edit Wikipedia anymore, because it is not worth getting into more trouble on this site. I have understood that I should have gotten blocked, because copyright infringement put Wikipedia, as a whole, in legal jeopardy. I have proven many times that I would not stop copyrighting, but now, I am going to stop. If it is alright, I would like to have this account unblocked. Owenrose1021 (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Owenrose1021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my block on violating copyright policy with images. I will never do it again, I understand you blocking me, and I plan on moving forward in my journey of editing Wikipedia. At the time, I did not understand the image copyright policies, and I should have taken a look at that. Owenrose1021 (talk) 22:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we must be convinced that you understand what copyight is, how Wikipedia is licensed, and when and how you can use copyrighted content on Wikipedia- it's not enough to just tell us that you understand. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Owenrose1021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now know the purpose of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. In which, that is what most of Wikipedia's text and images come from, that license. I now have seen and looked at how Wikipedia is licensed. I cannot reuse any text nor images. Now, I have seen that I cannot screenshot, scan, or not do anything with and image that is copyrighted. If I could use an image that is copyrighted, it has to be under fair use, otherwise, you cannot do anything to it. However, I now know that if you do upload an image, you can upload one that you made entirely yourself like animals and plants. I will never use any images with copyright licensing again. Owenrose1021 (talk) 12:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not very coherent. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #57131

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

understood Owenrose1021 (talk) 19:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #57565

is closed. --Yamla (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

understood Owenrose1021 (talk) 19:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

in June as Owentherosehead2008 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:42, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests at UTRS

Unblock requests 57131, 57407, 57565, 60343, 61402, and 74488 from this account have all been closed, as have unblock requests 60030, 60132, and 71017 from the account Owentherosehead2008. When at least three of those nine requests were closed, you were told that you should make your requests on this talk page, not at UTRS. JBW (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]