Jump to content

User talk:OverlordQ/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

70.251.179.245

Nice one. I reported him to AIV but it looks like you've gone and solved the problem for us. Thanks! Lithoderm 21:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

Orphaned non-free image File:Fort Minor-Where'd You Go.ogg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fort Minor-Where'd You Go.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flo Rida-Right Round.ogg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flo Rida-Right Round.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Britney Spears - If U Seek Amy.ogg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Britney Spears - If U Seek Amy.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

Blocked IP of an educational institution

Hi OverlordQ. Please consider a softer block to IP address 200.47.31.193. It belongs to a very large University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. I'm editing from my home now :P. Thanks, Gustronico (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked IP of an educational institution

Hi OverlordQ. Please consider a softer block to IP address 200.47.31.193. It belongs to a very large University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. I'm editing from my home now :P. Thanks, Gustronico (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

Quick draw!

I'll concede that quick action by a BAM member as useful... --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 22:34, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OverlordQ. You have new messages at Tim1357's talk page.
Message added 05:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I replied. Tim1357 (talk) 05:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

Template:Ghetto rock

You deleted Template:Ghetto rock as "a template that blatently misrepresents policy". I don't see how this template says anything about policy at all. It should probably have been moved to article space, and possibly deleted as not notable, but this wasn't a WP:CSD#T2 situation that i can see. DES (talk) 22:09, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

You're right, I thought I specified A7 and realized that after it was deleted, however there's no real way to change the log. Q T C 22:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
There, I restored it, moved it, and deleted it again. Q T C 22:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

re: CSD

Hello! Noticed you declined an article I marked as G1 noting it needed translation, all I saw were rows upon rows upon rows of little squares, which was my rationale as marking it as gibberish. I was just curious, I have all the language packs installed so usually if its in a non-Western script it will show properly for me.... 2 says you, says two 22:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

It's in Bengali, so you need an appropriate font. Language packs wont do much if you dont have a font that can render the characters. Q T C 22:56, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Ah, that makes sense... thanks for clarifying 2 says you, says two 23:22, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkpage Template

Do you have any ideas on how to redirect the redlinked shortcut to my talkpage?--MaximilianT (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Which what now? Q T C 22:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
In the first template on my talkpage, you can read "Shortcut:MaximilianT", but the link for the shortcut is in fact a redlink. Do you have any ideas on how to fix that?--MaximilianT (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
User talk pages generally don't have shortcuts as there is nothing that should redirect to your page. Removing MaximilianT from {{User talk header}} will fix that. Q T C 22:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for helping. --MaximilianT (talk) 23:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Deleted article recreation

Hi, just a note to let you know the article you deleted about 15 minutes ago, Shitty arse, has been recreated by user Ruttygibbo, obviously in spite of the CSD. KaySL (talk) 01:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

User 120.17.58.134

This anonymous user has recently vandalized my talk page after a "only warning" issued by you. Just thought I'd bring it to your attention, as well as AIV. According to the talk page and a tracert, the IP seems to be coming from a mobile phone provider, so I am not 100% sure how this situation differs from when a single user is causing the vandalism.

Thanks for the help. GLaDOS (talk) 01:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

Notice

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#WP:PROD wheel war and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, MBisanz talk 09:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

Imam Mehdi Gohar Shahi

Can you explain why you reverted Imam Mehdi Gohar Shahi to a version that nobody but edit warriors agrees with? I know, it's The Wrong Version, but the people who want the redirect to be at the version you reverted to, are the ones who are making racist and personal attack comments on the people who were mentioned in the other version. 67.51.38.51 (talk) 16:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Because group A wants Foo on the page, group B want Bar on the page. The page now is a disambig of Foo and Bar. Q T C 21:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with Imam Mehdi Gohar Shahi, there seems to be a lot of edit warring on the articles regarding him lately. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

Could you protect The Representative of Gohar Shahi as well? Woogee (talk) 22:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Submit a request to WP:RFPP. Q T C 22:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, will do. Woogee (talk) 23:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
Thanks very much for removing the vandalism from my userpage. I appreciate it, mate! Cheers, MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 04:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.

Do you know who the user User:Mflynn24 was, a sockpuppet of some one? I wonder what motive they had to vandalize my page. Thanks for catching it. :) —Mike Allen 09:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Dunno, probably no one, just standard vandal. Q T C 09:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
That's a first for me! :P —Mike Allen 09:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
I would say see if you've edited any of the same things but he's only edited 3 articles, dunno, might be sock. Q T C 09:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Tosh.0

Can you please work to unprotect the tosh.0 page. Tosh.0 is a tv show on Comedy Central, and on the most recent episode, the Host, Daniel Tosh asked the viewers to edit the Tosh.0 wikipedia page. (Source: Tosh.0 website) <-- (Source was miscopied, and is corrected, if it makes a difference)

No. Q T C 04:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
No, it doesn't make a difference. Tosh does not own the article about him, so it is not up to him what goes on there. Q T C 04:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

In that case, can he have it deleted and build his own? It seems if it's about him and he can't even edit it, it should be taken away... XXjellycheeksXx (talk) 05:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

WP has policies, like conflict of interest and the like. Vandalism is one of those things that is also against the rules. He's more then welcome to start his own wiki and ask people to vandalize it, but as long as he wants to play with Wikipedia he has to follow the rules too. Q T C 05:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

but considering that the host of the show is expecting a fully edited page in the morning could you please consider unblocking it i dont see the problem with doing that Rjauregui (talk) 07:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

<snark>Well, since you asked nicely . . . . </snark> Q T C 07:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

thats a no huh? Rjauregui (talk) 07:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. The will of the people outweigh the will of one man. Q T C 07:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

we are the people and tosh is with us if another person besides tosh made a page about him then it should be deleted Rjauregui (talk) 07:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

What? It does not matter what Tosh wants. His voice does not carry any more weight then any individual editor. Wikipedia has policies about this. Q T C 07:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

ok so he has to make his own page for us edit it Rjauregui (talk) 07:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

No. It would likely be deleted as it is not encyclopedic in nature. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for people to come up with the most hilarious vandalism, it is an encyclopedia. Q T C 07:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

and i take it ur gana be the guy to delete itRjauregui (talk) 07:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Depends. I dont know how many times I've said this, but Wikipedia has policies and guidelines. Everything must follow these, it is highly unlikely a page created by Tosh, for the sole purpose of people vandalizing it, is acceptable by any policy, so yes I would delete it. Q T C 07:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

well its not vandalism if its stated as fact so unless you know every detail of his life you cant delete it correctRjauregui (talk) 07:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

No, articles on wikipedia need reliable sources and citations. It may not be vandalism, but it is against other policies. And please stop trying to come up with a rationale for allowing people to vandalize, it wont happen. Q T C 07:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deliberate misinformation is vandalism, and will be dealt with appropriately. As will the editors responsible for the vandalism. —Dark 07:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I think it's crazy to think that if Daniel Tosh started his own page and edited the info himself, that is could be deleted because it's then autobiographical and therefor you have to take his word on it. It's not like the he has documented EVERY experience in his life and even if he wanted to, apparently WP wouldn't be the people to help him start... + every bit of information about him, no matter how small could be at some point beneficial to someone/anyone who needed the info, whether he had sources for his life experience not.XXjellycheeksXx (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Again, WE HAVE POLICIES for this. An encyclopedia isn't an autobiography, it's a list of verifiable facts. Also, this is entirely beside the point, he didn't write his article. Q T C 16:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Then who did OverlordQ? what if my information gives people more information about Daniel Tosh's Comedy career, Any you also said "No, articles on wikipedia need reliable sources and citations" So if dont need a Reliable source nor do i need a Citation. So for all you could know Daniel tosh could have eaten Donkey dookie to start his Career. How would you know other wise??XxBubbl3zxXXx (talk) 02:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Your information is not valuable in terms of Tosh's career. You do not meet our reliable sources standards. And you obviously do not know what a comma is used for. —Dark 06:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

More Thanks.

Thanks for the user page revert.  :) Aruton (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

WWE NXT

Hi. I've requested a speedy delete for WWE NXT (a page you userfied) for maintainence purposes. We basically want to de-userfy the page. Could you help us with that?--UnquestionableTruth-- 03:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done Q T C 04:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!--UnquestionableTruth-- 04:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Did you leave a gate open or something?

Either I'm just becoming more disillusioned, or the stupid factor is particularly high today. HalfShadow 02:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Just check this talk page history for more facepalm action :) OverlordQ (talk) 02:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I was here for most of it. HalfShadow 02:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Ah, my bad, hard to keep track :) OverlordQ (talk) 02:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Reverting Vandalism

Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page. SQGibbon (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

User_talk:Jeremy67876

Hi

I notice that you did not take any action against this user after you had warned him about vandalism. I am just curious as to your train of thought on that process.

I warned him after several counts of vandalism [1] on Kievan Rus' - You then gave him "final warning" after another on the same article

He then edited Holy Roman Empire twice and you reverted one (his second and last edit)

I was surprised that you did not proceed further (or I can't see that you did) and wondered if there was a reason for this ?

I am only interested as I want to see how the process works and am unsure if it was because I had perhaps over-reacted in the first warning level. I have reverted his first edit on the Holy Roman Empire and wanted to ask you as I was going to warn him again but you have already given him "last warning" and you are more than capable of taking it further but have not.

thanks...Chaosdruid (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Because it wasn't technically considered vandalism. OverlordQ (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Lol - fair enough thats good enough for me - I'll leave it then and see if anything else transpires lol
Chaosdruid (talk) 22:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
It's debatable, might have been vandalism, but just as likely somebody try to add the asked for sources and not knowing any better. OverlordQ (talk) 22:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

Happy Christmas!

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png

LouriePieterse is wishing you Happy Christmas! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Yuletide, Litha, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukkah, Kwanzaa, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

"The greatest gift they'll get this year is life." ~ Bob Geldof & Midge Ure

Spread the hugs & cheer by adding {{subst:User:Deliriousandlost/happy christmas}} to your friends' talk pages.

Timestamping for archiving. Q T C 23:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Velociraptorbot

I noticed that Velociraptorbot was denied. How would you know if I don't know anything about programming a bot? The Utahraptor (talk) 01:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Because you can't even explain how the bot will work. You say you want to write an anti-vandalism bot, but you have failed on all accounts to explain how exactly the bot will determine what is vandalism. Q T C 07:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for answering my question. I will make sure I know how to write an anti-vandalism bot next time I try to create one. The Utahraptor (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

?

wharrgarbl? LOL Woogee (talk) 01:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

English Wikipedia Internal Account Creation Interface Approval

Could you approve my account please, as no-one seems to have approved it yet. Thanks Paul2387 22:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Joe Gazz84

Please make me an editor again. Why was that not to be sighted? What are the criteria for sighting? It is human nature to mess up. I am new at this, I would like some sort of explaination of what to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Gazz84 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Vandal

Hi. I'm trying to stop a vandal who is quite persistent. Using a shared IP. See [[2]] Need help. Thanks, Jim Steele (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Vandal II

It seems user Golfer9 has a thing for vandalizing pages about American politicians. I reverted another edit by this user a few minutes ago and since you (or one of your bot-minions) had previously warned that person I thought you might like to know about it. --Lukeonia1 (talk) 09:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of ACC templates

Hello! A few ACC templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the templates' entry on the Templates for discussion page. This notice is because you are an ACC admin. Thanks! Avicennasis @ 04:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible?

Can a bot be created which will automatically clear an entry on a user's watchlist when he clicks on "diff"? Watchlists can often have screeds of entries and it would make it easier if entries dropped off when actioned. (I'm not a compu-nerd so don't know if it is possible even). Moriori (talk) 23:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: User talk:69.137.74.194

This is the ONLY edit that editor ever did. So why is it that I am the one who's getting yelled at? 98.71.245.241 (talk) 23:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what he did, you don't call people douchebags. Q T C 23:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
But didn't you read his edit? He started it! 98.71.245.241 (talk) 23:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
It doesn't matter. Just because it did it, doesn't make it okay for you to do the same thing. - Zhang He (talk) 23:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind, but I'm going to step in. 98.71.245.241: I would like to refer you to WP:Civility. Incivility should not be met with incivility, because that constitutes a personal attack no matter who "started it". Thanks, and feel free to post on my talk page if you have any questions. GorillaWarfare talk 00:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OverlordQ. You have new messages at GorillaWarfare's talk page.
Message added 00:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GorillaWarfare talk 00:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Inappropriate username?  :-)

Funny, that same template no longer says... "Inappropriate username". Nor does the history of that template or the redirect show any activity. Weird. If ya can't trust the templates, what can you trust? ;-) Shenme (talk) 06:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hellllo! How ya doing? --Hi, I'm a Scooby-pedian! (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OverlordQ. You have new messages at Allen4names's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Q T C 18:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

File:ACC-Flowchart.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ACC-Flowchart.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY (TALK) 06:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for the help and the suggestions. This was actually very helpful for me. I am going to do a ton of serious wiki policy reading.Schnapps17 (talk) 01:09, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Election page

Hi! Just in case you're not aware, you're being discussed here. Figured you'd probably like to be notified. Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 21:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Assistance request with an engineer

Hi. I picked you as a random admin with the userbox {{user engineer}}. I'm looking for someone to help assist a famous engineer (unconfirmed, but likely), with the editing of Wikipedia. All the details can be found by a quick perusal of these contribs and his talkpage (which he blanked once after this diff, on April 18.). I'm hoping you could either help him out, or find someone else appropriate to do so. I'm watchlisting everything, so reply/act wherever (and please let me know if I've done anything terribly wrong, so far :) Much thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 23:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi again. You seem to be busy elsewhere, so I've asked User talk:EncMstr for input. Just fyi. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I'd be more then willing to help, but strong writing skills are not my forte, so I could likely help with policy, etc, but formatting writing is left to a better editor. Q T C 20:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
This was dealt with, feel free to archive. I'm unwatching. Thanks again. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 19:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Page protection

Good morning.... can you please protect the article Demographic history of Bačka until the conflict me + Wladthemlat vs Hobartimus + Outesticide is solved?

There is an old conflict that transfers from a page to another: [3] [4]

I will try to sum it all up :

  • The problem is about inserting in the article the sourced data sbout the censuses from 1715 and 1720 which present an overwhelming majority of the Serbs over Hungarians
  • The Hungarian users refuse to add these data to he article, claiming that they are not reliable (personal opinion unsupported by a source) and organized in september 2007 a vote about the reliability of these census data, even if the data are confirmed by academic sources User:Fcsaba (Hungarian editor), User:Hobartimus (Hungarian editor), UseR:PaxEquilibrium (Montenegro editor), User:Rjecina (Croatian editor) (so not even an user from Serbia, the country the area belongs to)
  • In present Me, User:Wladthemlat, User:PANONIAN contest this vote and the argument of the supportees of not inserting data from these censuses is that themselves consider History declared them unreliable (without showing a source, so it is just a personal POV)
  • In conclusion, does an opinion of a certain user from WP override an academic source? (MarekSS (talk) 06:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC))

User:Funnyjunkdotcomrules

Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Funnyjunk666, I'm hardening that block. That's part of a (will fail) coordinated effort by users on another website to vandalize Wikipedia. We don't need them creating anymore of these accounts if we can help it. Regards, –MuZemike 14:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Unicode smilies at Wikimedia Commons

Could you add the unicode text used to create those smiley face SVGs to their descriptions? Thanks! Relaxing (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done

File:G20_world_leaders.png

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-20_major_economies This image was deleted. I am PISSED! This is not fair.

I understand that I don't own this image. But I did invest a lot of time and do oww the original tears and sweat that went to it. For every delete you make, subjectively and like a dictator, it has a human consequence. How dare you. Seriously. Why not show the courtesy and notify the author and have a respectful conversation? I find this whole going around deleting really offensive and elitest. Thanks a lot guys for making Wikipedia suck and blocking something that really could of contributed to the common good.

Wikipedia is the most frustrating thing ever and I absolute hate some of these things. HATE IT!:

1. I spend approx 5+ hours working on something like this image and then someone just swoops it and deletes it. What gives you the right to do this? This was an honest piece of work. No one made you the delete boss. How would you like it if I went and deleted all your work. Wikipedia is SO elitest. Yuck.

2. I should be notified to any changes and especially DELETES that are made to MY work.

3. I am extremely upset that the "deletion debate" happened and I was not involved. This is the most attrocious thing ever. Like a court case where the defendant and his lawyer are not present. I should of been automatically notified.

4. Tracking the history of the changes and deletions to my work was so hard. I could view all changes to a page, but I want to view all activity on my specific image and the changes made to it.

As to the merits of this "deletion debate": 1. This image was self-made. No I didn't personally photography all these world leaders. Du.

2. FYI The Obama photo is NOT a cropped version of the flickr image. It is from a different image. OverlordQ you are wrong.

3. Thank you 211.181.143.3 the file is useful and can contribute. I think it can and thus there is no harm in including it.

4. The cowboy obama in my opinion, is not amateurish but shows a unique side of obama and an uniquely american yank. Official portrati would be fine with me. The mature wikipedia thing to do would be to contact me and ask me to change or use the original image to change yourself (or ask for the alterantive .pub file).

5. Emperor Akihito and Queen Elizabeth aren't directly relevant BUT they show the leaders and political figures of each countries. THe top 2 both head of state and president. They follow form and serve as a comparison of political figures and queens/emperors as they relate to the geopolitical environment.

6. Obama photo copyright, why delete the whole image, change the image.


Summary: - I apologize for being immature and naive. This is why I want to hate wikipedia and it really really really frustrates, offends me and makes me never want to contribute anything ever again.

- Why did people hate wikipedia? Beacause it is so difficult and the least user friendly thing ever to edit and because of elitest wikipedia editors who thing they are better than others and own this site. YOU DON'T. A person who has made 1 edit is just as important as someone who has made 1000 edits.

- The structural flaws in wikipedia (from not including me in deletion debates, to techinical difficulty such as not making specific file history clear, not notifying me of changes to my work, messiness in user interfactes etc. created this.

- Overall, you're ruthlessness and complete and utter indifference TO THE HUMAN BEING behind the work is what holds wikipedia back.


taylorluker@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taylorluker (talk • contribs) 09:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

I've replied to your post here. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 05:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Glenn Beck

Hello. You missed part of the text you were trying to remove from visibility here. Bringing this to your attention, so you can remove that too. Akerans (talk) 02:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Black Hole Barnstar

That would make a good template now, wouldn't it? It's probably common for vandalism to be targeted at one admin for a day, so in case there are future attacks... mechamind90 06:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

That's not how you move a page)

That's not how you move a page) so instead of being a sarcastic why dont you move it properly? it should be titled anorexia nervosa (differential diagnoses). There is something called a talk page right? JFC 7mike5000 (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

You copypaste move a page, Coren Bot gives you a warning with a handy link on how to do it right, but you chose to ignore this advice and go back to trying to redirect to the new page. So yea, thats not how you do it was fitting. Q T C 08:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Obviously your a liitle full of yourself man, your user name says it all OverlordQ. but you chose to ignore this advice and go back to trying to redirect to the new page. If I knew how to do it I would of. So you know where you can put your sarcasm. Cleaning up users copy paste move mess.) People with your attitude screws this up for everybody. 7mike5000 (talk) 08:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OverlordQ/Archive_5&oldid=1091530229"