User talk:Opera hat/Archive 4

Eton College

Hello Opera hat. Just to say that I have added a comment on the Talk page of Eton College in relation to a recent edit by you. Best wishes, 45ossington (talk) 16:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sir 'Andrews' Windsor

Dear Opera hat, I have added a lengthy comment to the Talk page of Andrews Windsor, 1st Baron Windsor in relation to your move of this page. I think possibly the form 'Andrews' originates with a misprint in Dugdale's Barony (1675), with everyone copying him, and that the original form ought to be 'Andrew'. If you have evidence that I am wrong, would you be so kind as to post it there? Otherwise I think it ought to return to the original place. Many thanks, Eebahgum (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for replying. In the light of what you say it would probably be best to restore the page to its original title, and keep this one as a Redirect. Do you have any idea how to do that so as to preserve the edit and page talk history? It's rather beyond my skills. Would you be willing to do it? I would then clean up the article, wikify a bit and put those children in readable order, add a note about the name, and maybe develop the actual subject slightly. As you wish. Cheers, Eebahgum (talk) 13:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for your work on this. Opera hat (talk) 13:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir! No sooner said than done. Eebahgum (talk) 14:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Opera hat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Opera hat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of British Army full generals

Do you think that it would be worth splitting off the Indian generals, currently in List of British Army full generals, into their own list? Greenshed (talk) 03:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. I think there is too much overlap to make the distinction very meaningful. Opera hat (talk) 14:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. Greenshed (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice on use of Template:Sortname when adding names to a sortable table. I was helping someone else out, but coding that may be a step too far. Shipsview (talk) 16:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I've often found that all the template stuff can be a deterrent to editing. The sortname one isn't too bad, though. Opera hat (talk) 23:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion closure

Good morning, I'm just checking if you wish to follow up on this CfD discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In principle, yes. I just haven't got round to doing anything about it yet. Opera hat (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Opera hat. You have new messages at Talk:First Cameron ministry.
Message added 23:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Nevé –selbert 23:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Henry Robinson Bond

The article James Henry Robinson Bond has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have done as thorough a search as I can, but I cannot locate sources to indicate that this subject passes WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER. Although Who Was Who vol IV is mentioned as a source, it is long-established that Who's Who volumes are typically not considered WP:RS for the purposes of proving notability. Other than that, I can only trace him in primary source mentions (for example in lists of military personnel or routine retirement and death notices), which WP:SOLDIER establishes is not sufficient to establish notability. There are no secondary sources published about him, or even mentioning him, that I have found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you review the entry on his talk page? Shipsview (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article nearly ten years ago, and I wouldn't have done it now. If the man is notable enough for an article, then more articles should link to him. Opera hat (talk) 08:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ceremonial Day Coats (Royal Navy)

Hi there; was just wondering if I could clarify a few things as regards the gold shoulder boards used by members of the royal family of the rank of Captain and Commanders (like the Prince of Wales and Duke of York) in this order of dress.

As far as I am aware, the insignia used are:

Commodore:Crown, crossed baton & sword and one star.
Captain: Crown, one star and a foul anchor.
Commander: a foul anchor.

Is there re. anything 'official' that allows the wear of this order of dress by royals of this rank? As according to current dress regs, CDCs are only worn by (and I quote): "members of the Royal Family attaining flag rank, First Sea Lord, Admirals of the Fleet, full Admirals and the defence services secretary when a Naval Officer."

Many thanks,

JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Going by your recent post at Talk:Royal Navy officer rank insignia, it sounds like you know more about it than I do. Opera hat (talk) 08:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Governors of Fort William

Many moons ago, I began collecting names in my sandbox of Governors of Fort William with the intention of visiting the Fort William Museum to complete the task. This has not happened, but today I noticed that you have written a list. I have found additional names to your list, and hope that you might review my findings to see if these might fill gaps - if there are any - in your list. Thank you. Shipsview (talk) 09:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That list should be complete after the 1750s, as I think I checked it against the Army Lists on the National Archives website. Please charge ahead and add names of earlier Governors. Your sandbox doesn't give any sources, though. Opera hat (talk) 20:24, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc notice

An Rfc is opened at Charles, Prince of Wales concerning the article's lead. You may want to place that article on your watchlist :) GoodDay (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I'm aware :) Opera hat (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Opera hat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about MOS:JOBTITLES

There is a discussion about whether to add clarifying text (shown in boldface ) to MOS:JOBTITLES at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Clarification of "Titles of people" that you may be interested in. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See the Category talk:Lords of Badenoch. PatGallacher (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

post-nominal's

Hey, to further on with the 'CD' post-nominals, the Canadian Forces Decoration handbook by the Canadian Defence Force lists the 'CD' following all other commonwealth awards - [1] - I hope this helps. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 09:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Opera hat The 'GCL' is used in numerous countries and is also citated in the reference above ^ and among the references currently sitting next to Princess Annes post-nominals. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 12:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That same source describes the Princess Royal as LG and LT, which is wrong, so I don't think it can be regarded as authoritative in this matter. Opera hat (talk) 12:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moving a page discussion

Could you see a page move discussion relating to WP:NCPEER at Talk:Iain McNicol? --Editor FIN (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]