User talk:Openmy

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Openmy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Paul MacDermott (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for Janis Joplin

Hello, I see you added an LGBT and bisexual category for the Janis Joplin article. The problem is that according to Wikipedia guidelines we need reliable sources in the article to back up those claims before adding the categories. Unless I'm missing something I do not see those criteria being met. Here's the text from WP:Categorization "Categorization must be verifiable: it should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories." And from the ethnicity, gender, religion, and sexuality categorization guidelines this text "As to the inclusion of people in an ethnicity, gender, religion, or sexuality related category, please remember that inclusion must be based on reliable sources. For example, regardless of whether you have personal knowledge of a notable individual's sexual orientation, the article should only be added to a LGBT-related category after verifiable, reliable published sources have been provided in the article that support the inclusion." It's also helpful to read this which deals with sexuality specifically. If you have any questions or comments about this you can contact me on my talk page. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 00:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I have reverted your addition to the Janis Joplin article. One reason is purely technical -- we do not put footnotes on categories, the article itself must make the claim with reliable sources then we can add the category. Also, before adding these categories please read the previous discussion about this issue on the Janis Joplin Talk page. And then also read the last link I provided above about sexuality and categories. I'll quote the relevant part here "For a dead person, there must be a verified consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate." Emphasis added by me on the word "consensus". There does not appear to be any kind of consensus among scholars that Joplin was bisexual. And then "For example, while some sources have claimed that William Shakespeare was gay or bisexual, there is not a sufficient consensus among scholars to support categorizing him as such. Similarly, a living person who is caught in a gay prostitution scandal, but continues to assert their heterosexuality, can not be categorized as gay." The Shakespeare example appears to be very similar to the situation with Joplin and community consensus has long been that there should not be any LGBT categories applied to that article. But again, if you disagree with any of these assessments the place to deal with it is on the Joplin talk page and build consensus for your view and not to edit war over the issue. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zoë Ball

Why are you removing a category from Zoë Ball? You haven't given any explanation. In the future, please use edit summaries so that other editors can understand why you are making the changes you are making; also, don't remove categories that apply to an article without some specific reason. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BLPCAT requirements

Please do not add sexuality categories to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content and 2) evidence that the individual identifies as such. Please see WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS for additional information.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of honorifics

Honorifics are usually not placed in the body of the article where you are putting them, but in the infobox space for the name. You may wish to check this before adding any more lest they be reverted and your work wasted. Britmax (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MMA

Hello,

i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!

Kevlar (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Judy Garland as gay icon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Evans (presenter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadcaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Woody Allen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Awards for Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008)], IMDb.com</ref> and in 2014 [[Cate Blanchett]]<ref>[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000949/awards?ref_=nm_awd}. IMDB.com</ref> won for ''[[Blue Jasmine]].''<ref>[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2334873/awards?ref_=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your alterations to People who disappeared mysteriously are unnecessary as all the names you corrected are linked to the various articles already and the article is only about people who have disappeared. Please stop edit warring. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 17:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Post nominal letter

Hi Openmy! I see that you have been editing a number of linked post nominal letters to remove the longer, full title (and redirect) to make it a direct link to the article: IE, you have changed [[Officer of the Order of the British Empire|OBE]] to [[Order of the British Empire|OBE]]. There is no need to change these links. In fact, they are more informative, as the explination of was the letters stand for appears when you hover of it: eg, OBE vs OBE. As per WP:NOTBROKEN, there is no need to correct a link to a redirect to a link to the 'end' article as you have been doing. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk 15:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Openmy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BLP vio

It is a violation of one of Wikipedia's core policies, WP:BLP, to make uncited claims about a living person's personal life. Two cited sources at Octavia Spencer, including Biography.com, give 1972. If you have a credible WP:RS saying otherwise, you must provide it. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At this edit, you gave her birth year as 1970, when two sources give 1972. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But at this edit, you give 1972, so it's confusing. Thank you for your corrections that say 1972. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Openmy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Sean Connery shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Begoon 22:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Openmy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jim Cornette, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 21:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in The Lion King (2019 film). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See WP:NOTBROKEN and do not bypass valid redirects per reasons in that article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:49, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to tell you about WP:DONOTFIXIT and WP:NOPIPE yet it appears you have been told about this months ago. Why are you still making these sort of changes, as you did here? - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 14:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of WWE personnel, you may be blocked from editing. StaticVapor message me! 17:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning for disruptivly changing links, ignoring multiple users who have told you not to. You are required to WP:ENGAGE and follow WP:NOPIPE. StaticVapor message me! 17:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- This now makes at least 3 different users writting on your talk page about the same issue and countless others who have reverted your edits. When you made this edit [1], you were reverted [2] and once again told of the guide, yet instead you just came back and made the same edit again [3]. That makes 4 different people that have reverted you and pointed you to the exact same guide. Perhaps you should realize that the way you are editing is incorrect. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 20:09, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - You have been told about this by multiple people, yet you are still doing the same thing [4], why? - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 18:08, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WWE 24/7 Championship. Do not fix redirects. Go through WP:DONOTFIXIT. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:32, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 14:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Tom Jones (singer), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Graham87 03:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cliff Richard, you may be blocked from editing. Graham87 14:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard chart templates

Hi. Could you explain what you are doing with the Billboard chart templates?

My understanding is that these are for articles on individual recordings. They do not belong under artist awards, not being an "award", and being generally unrelated to the article subject. So you are adding quite large templates to articles that are have little to do with them.

Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 09:45, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!
You were asked to include edit summaries back in 2012. You have made 4,769 edits to Wikipedia, 98.8% of which you have not included an edit summary. Please note that your lack of edit summaries make it difficult for other WP users to understand your edits. I am pleading with you to include even the briefest of edit summaries every time you edit. Please! --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Openmy: since 2011, you have never replied to or made any changes to this talk page at all. I am pinging you as a request for you to read and acknowledge this. Thanks. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

post-nominals

Hi, Please read WP:SMALLFONT about using small fonts in info boxes. Besides that, it looks like the small tag doesn't have any affect on the post-nominal template, it has its own size parameter, so it's pointless using it. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:39, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Post nominals should also be added to infoboxes as I've done here; https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cheryl_Pearce&diff=1068299709&oldid=1068299363&diffmode=source --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Andrew Haigh. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nardog (talk) 01:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sara Ramirez, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:ELLIPSIS. CodeTalker (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bypass valid working redirects

See MOS:NOPIPE for reasons and it is part of the Manual of Style to not do so. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are still doing this, Openmy. WP:NOTBROKEN is a thing and I suggest you read it. Working redirects do not need to be "fixed". Your edit has been reverted and edits like this will continue to be by all manner of editors until you stop. Ss112 07:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kevin Costner. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:51, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cynthia Daniel edit

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Cynthia Daniel. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published, non-primary source. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have repeatedly been advised of WP:NOTBROKEN and WP:NOPIPE, yet continue to make such edits.[5][6][7] Please discontinue this disruptive editing. Grandpallama (talk) 17:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, these edits to "Starmer ministry". Please don't add unnecessary piped links. Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 12:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Margin Call, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned multiple times regarding your "contributions". Please stop now. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]