User talk:OpenYourEyes2

OpenYourEyes2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi OpenYourEyes2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Grayfell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cuckservative have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 16:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Millennials has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Millennials was changed by OpenYourEyes2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861319 on 2017-02-15T05:44:20+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Millennials

I undid your edit to Millennials as you deleted references that are needed in the body of the article. See wp:citing sources The changes are stored in the wp:page history, so you can get access to your edits. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where you see <ref name="some name">, it is used elsewhere as <ref name="some name"/> (note the "/"). You can see the errors in the references section by following this link to the old version. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Millennials, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cuckservative, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Genesis (band). - Mlpearc (open channel) 21:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rush (band). Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 15:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Swinging London. Unsourced, unexplained date change - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Millenials, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Garchy (talk) 13:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Generation Z. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 07:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Millennials, you may be blocked from editing. Garchy (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aidan Gillen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bane. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sock puppet investigation

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phil A. Fry. Thank you. --DynaGirl (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stuart Snyder

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stuart Snyder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stuart Snyder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuart Snyder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Snyder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]