This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, you can do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1 | Archive 2 →

Top | Talk (new message, archives) | User page | Contribs | User log

This is an index of all past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. A full list of talk page archives can be found here.

May 2006

; Archives index
	May 2006; June 2006; July 2006 (175 KB); August 2006 (244 KB); September 2006 (126 KB); October 2006 (135 KB); November 2006 (82 KB);

Welcome!

Hello, Omicronpersei8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 09:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Countervandal work

I decided to be bold and add you to the CV membership on your userpage. You're welcome to remove it if you don't want it there. Keep up the good work, OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 00:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archie Gemmill

Hi there, I notice you had edited bits of Archie Gemmill; we must have been there at roughly the same time. I added a clean up tag; I felt some of the content was worthwhile, but the inclusion of the referencing was done to a poor standard, hence why I flagged clean up. I have noted that on the talk page there and hopefully the ranter came come back without an anonymous contrib and do the links/refs properly Ianguy 09:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there is some useful content there, and the "rant" label was just a quick and short-sighted explanation for my edit (which probably stemmed from what I thought was a loaded statement, "... famous for scoring one famous goal ... In fact the goal is so famous that it completely overshadows that which within others would be celebrated"). I still feel it looks more like a commentary or sports article than what is expected of an enyclopedia. If the editor comes back and fixes it, I'll be happy to go along with it. -- Omicronpersei8 09:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, you can do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1 | Archive 2 →