User talk:Omc

Etymology

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I want to add an etymology to an article. Is there a standard style for this? Should it be added in the intro? (Example: "Melisma (from the Greek word ....) or something like that.) If so, is there a standard format? Or in a separate Etymology or Word Origin section?

And more generally, is there a way to find out the answer to questions on Wikipedia editing without a "help me" request like this? I'm an occasional Wikipedia editor, and don't know all the ins and outs of editing. I usually find an example of what I want to do, and use that as a model. But I'm sure a lot of this has been documented in a style guide somewhere and I just don't know where to find it.

Thanks.

Omc (talk) 02:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Omc – you'll find loads of info on this subject at wp:ETYMOLOGY, the linguistics page that deals with that subject. Also, since you're like many of us who find examples from which to edit, I found a search page that may interest you. It lists several articles with links to their etymology sections. This should get you started. In the future just do like I did: I typed "wp:etymology" in the Wikipedia search field to find the project, and I typed "mos:etymology" to find the search list. The search engine is your friend. Hope you thoroughly enjoy editing this encyclopedia! Joys! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 02:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Paine! Omc (talk) 09:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!, Omc! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 06:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I sometimes follow discussions on talk pages. Is there any way to find specifically the comments that have been added since I last looked at the page?

Thanks. Omc (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can use your WP:Watchlist. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Omc. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! George Ho (talk) 04:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How to find out who wrote specific sections of articles?

Is there any way to look at a particular passage or section in the article and see who wrote it or touched it? I know that an article's revision history can be viewed, so that eventually it would be possible to figure out who wrote specific passages - but that could take a lot of work, and it's easy to overlook what I'm looking for.

Also, on the revision history pages, what specifically does the Filter field do? What fields are considered in the filtering?

Thanks. Omc (talk) 16:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I just select a part of a sentence and use the "find" in the browser to find the part - I do that on versions 100 apart (the default change on the history "next page"), then hone in once I've found the history page with the change - then try the middle then divide the next in two - just a "binary chop" on the page - until I find the revision. Obviously for pages with big histories one can do 500 apart. I've a vague felling there is another way, so I'll leave the help up. (Never found a use for the filter!) Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use WikiBlame. --Gryllida (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You could also use Replay Edits but it seems only useful if you know a relatively narrow time frame to replay. --Gryllida (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help - Reliable sources - video clips

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm watching/participating a talk page discussion which has disagreement abut what's a reliable source. The article is a biography of a living person, so that the Wikipedia BLP rules apply, and the issue is whether this person's clear statement that he's gay in an online video clip from an entertainment show is a legitimate source for the "personal life" section of the Wikipedia article on that person.

Some of the commenters on the talk page invoke the "reliable sources" rules and say that the rules against using tabloid-type sources should apply. I can understand the skepticism about using written statements from a entertainment news site or blog or tabloid-type source. But even if the web page might fail the "reliable source" test, it seems to me that a statement made by the subject of the article in a video on such a page does constitute a reliable source. (The video is an excerpt from a TV game show.)

But I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and can't find a clear statement on this point. I've looked at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources. I've also looked at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Avoid_self-published_sources and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Avoid_self-published_sources. But they focus on written statements and claims, and says nothing about videos.

Can anyone help me sort this out? The question seems to be: is a video statement out of the person's mouth disqualified because it appears on questionable source?

Thanks for any help. Omc (talk) 08:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reliable sources noticeboard would be a good place for such a question. Personally I'd be rather skeptical - when we could (and do) cite the BBC and ITV News instead, there's not really a reason to cite a game show. There are also issues of undue weight; this does seem more like celebrity gossip than anything else. Huon (talk) 15:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Omc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Wilshaw

Welcome! Regardless of whether the previous version is restored, you are welcome to create a new article there. The previous content was one sentence, "Kevin Wilshaw is a half-Jewish homosexual neo-Nazi white supremacist who was a well known organizer in the National Front before leaving the far right in 2017." with two sources: [1], [2]. VQuakr (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Omc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nextdoor

Hi,

In January, you left a Talk comment about the article for Nextdoor. I've written a an in-depth proposal describing my complete redraft of the article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nextdoor#Request_for_Review

Would you mind weighing in to the discussion?

Thanks! BC1278 (talk) 20:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Omc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]