User talk:Olmagon

Welcome!

Hi Olmagon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Patachonica (talk) 23:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willwood Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hendersonia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note

Thanks for your contributions. An important note: NEVER link to PDFs of journal articles hosted on Discord, like the one I removed here. This is against Wikipedia policy (WP:COPYLINK) because it opens us up to legal problems. Thanks! Ovinus (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images of Valentine type location?

Hi,

I have many images of the "Valentine" outcrop in Rush County, Kansas, but for this page I would prefer to use an image from the type location; anywhere around the Railway Quarries, Cherry County, Nebraska, should do.

You wouldn't happen to have any such image?

IveGoneAway (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I don't really have any images, all images I add to a page when I edit it simply is picked out from Wikimedia so if there aren't any there then I can't provide one either. Olmagon (talk) 16:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was just taking a chance you were a local. IveGoneAway (talk) 17:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eromangateuthis

Hello, Olmagon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eromangateuthis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Olmagon! Your additions to Gavinaspis have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eromangateuthis

Hello, Olmagon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eromangateuthis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Neolissochilus pnar you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't entirely understand what that means. I can tell it's something about copyright but not exactly what it is I did wrong. I mean I cited the source and reworded everything I could so it wouldn't be a direct copy. Olmagon (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was actually enough overlap that a bot reported it as a potential copyright violation. The source document is released under a CC-by 4.0 license, which means it's okay to copy, but you have to provide attribution. I added a template with this edit to indicate that the content was in part copied from that source and to show that it's compatibly licensed. — Diannaa (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paraná Formation

Thank you for creating the Paraná Formation article. However, it does not currently feature any references. I would recommend citing your sources, as any non-cited material is at risk of being deleted. The Green Star Collector (talk) 12:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I just went to eat lunch, I plan to continue working on it in a while. Olmagon (talk) 12:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Paraná Formation

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Paraná Formation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arkadelphia Marl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lapillus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haifanggou/Jiulongshan Formation

Hi, thanks for you work on improving paleobiota lists. I recently noticed your work on the Haifanggou Formation article. this checklist from 2021 suggests that at least 760 insects have been described from the formation. Paleoentomology is a notoriously difficult journal to actually get access to, so if you wanted the paper it would probably be best to email the authors to ask for it. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The book Rhythms of Insect Evolution: Evidence from the Jurassic and Cretaceous in Northern China Also provides a comprehensive listing of insects from the formation up until 2019, and is readily accessible via the Wikipedia library. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Template:Taxonomy/Ornithurae/skip

Whatever the consensus is, all the taxonomy templates that link to this taxonomy template need to be revised before you can remove it. See here. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Asiavorator

On 18 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Asiavorator, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although fossils of the extinct mammal Asiavorator were first found in 1922, the genus was not named until 73 years later, in 1995? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Asiavorator. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Asiavorator), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paroedura maingoka

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paroedura maingoka you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 02:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paroedura maingoka

The article Paroedura maingoka you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paroedura maingoka for comments about the article, and Talk:Paroedura maingoka/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for your work on Triassosculda! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 22:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Teratoscincus roborowskii

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Teratoscincus roborowskii you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pterodromoides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prefrontal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Olmagon. Thank you for your work on Daidalidae. User:Seawolf35, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

You can use the {{Rcatshell}} template to put a nice box around the categories for the redirect.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Seawolf35}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Seawolf35 (talk - email) 20:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko

The article Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko and Talk:Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 21:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko

The article Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko for comments about the article, and Talk:Mocquard's Madagascar ground gecko/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Teratoscincus roborowskii

The article Teratoscincus roborowskii you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Teratoscincus roborowskii and Talk:Teratoscincus roborowskii/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 01:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Teratoscincus roborowskii

The article Teratoscincus roborowskii you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Teratoscincus roborowskii for comments about the article, and Talk:Teratoscincus roborowskii/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1839 in paleontology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aura and Brome.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Teratoscincus roborowskii

On 4 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Teratoscincus roborowskii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the gecko Teratoscincus roborowskii eats caper fruits and disperses the plant's seeds in its feces? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teratoscincus roborowskii. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Teratoscincus roborowskii), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For writing (almost) all articles about fossil Mantis shrimps in a single day Abdullah raji (talk) 09:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Triassosculda

On 4 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Triassosculda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that until April 2023, when the genus Triassosculda was discovered, the mantis shrimp fossil record contained a gap of more than a hundred million years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Triassosculda. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Triassosculda), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Great work on Pseudastacus — and good luck on the GA! 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cladogram repetition

Did you know you can put the cladogram into a template, then put the template on the various pages. Then you'd only have to change the cladogram once and it would be effectively changed on all of the pages at once. Just a thought... - UtherSRG (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I actually didn't know that, useful thought though. Olmagon (talk) 18:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pseudastacus

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pseudastacus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 22:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pseudastacus

The article Pseudastacus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pseudastacus for comments about the article, and Talk:Pseudastacus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Pseudastacus

Congratulations, Olmagon! The article you nominated, Pseudastacus, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the club

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 16:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]