User talk:OliverTwist78
OliverTwist78, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi OliverTwist78! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC) |
List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing
[edit]I undid your removal of references. Your removal left a lot of broken refs. I check the After Image reference and found it to be working and valid - I don't understand your removing this reference.
Please don't remove dead links per wp:KDL "keep dead links" and wp:preserve Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Daihatsu Copen in left-hand-drive form.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Daihatsu Copen in left-hand-drive form.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:40, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
File:RTD Denver Light and Commuter Rail Map 2018.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RTD Denver Light and Commuter Rail Map 2018.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TAG Heuer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CHF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of Mercedes-Benz G-Class (W463)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mercedes-Benz G-Class (W463) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. buidhe 20:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International Motor Show Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Boeing 747 and Boeing 747-8, did not appear constructive and has been partially reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, discuss on the talk page of one of these articles. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Misjudged People
[edit] Hello, I'm Erik. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Misjudged People, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 02:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Misjudged People, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 14:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Misjudged People, you may be blocked from editing. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Misjudged People. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Misjudged People; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
OliverTwist: It is Erik, not me, who started the edit war. Given the fact that Erik created the English Wikipedia page in 2017, it seems that Erik got "territorial" and did not like it when somebody edited "his" page as to expand it with more material from German Wikipedia page.
I am fluent in German and English because I live in Germany so I translated the German Wikipedia page (Verkannte Menschen) into English and arranged the information for better flow. I also verified the German-language sources for accuracy and incorporated them with English-language sources. How is Erik to determine that German Wikipedia page isn't high quality and doesn't contain "suitable materials" and that the sources and citations are "potential" when he isn't fluent in German? He even added
 | You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (July 2020) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
on 14 July 2020 but became hostile toward me.
Erik is tossing in the excuses and baseless accusations as to protect his own creation from any future editions. It does seem that Erik doesn't accept the future contributions and does become hostile toward anyone who want to expand the article. I made the translation and arranged the page in good faith, but it is apparent that Erik doesn't want that. I am very frustrated with what is going on here.
Welcome!
[edit]Hi OliverTwist78! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
Oliver, sorry that you have such a difficult start here. I think you should a few more times that you are new here. The English Wikipedia is different from the German. One key to it is a strong belief in inline citations. Another that one should never add the same hing again when reverted. Try on the talk of Misjudged People to suggest paragraph by paragraph what you would like to add, with inline citations. Call me for help when stuck. I am behind with planned and unplanned projects, or would do more. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Oliver, perhaps I should have said again: please sign messages on talk pages. Wir können auch deutsch sprechen. How about a short notice below, indented with a colon, that you got this? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Gerda, Dankeschön für die Hinweise. Leider erfahre ich irgendetwas wie gebeitsmäßige Haltung von Erik, der der Ersteller der "Misjudged People" war. Er war unklar welche Sätze oder Absätze brauchen die weitere Quellen oder "inline citations" und hatte die Artikel schnell zurückgekehrt. Er könnte einfach [citations needed] einfügen, wo dies möglich ist. Davon kann ich auf weiteren Quellen (auf deutsch oder englisch) recherchieren und hinzufügen. Woher weiß Erik, dass die deutsche Artikel (Verkannte Menschen) nicht hochwertig und "suitable materials" ist, wenn er kein Deutsch kann? Ich basierte die englischsprachige Übersetzung von deutscher Artikel, korrigierte manche Informationen und fügte die deutschsprachige Quellen hinzu. Was mehr will Erik davon!?
- I Ich vermute, Erik will entweder deutschsprächige Quellen noch neue Änderungen. Meine Meinung: Erik hat eindeutig sein Vorrecht misshandelt. Wie viel kann ich noch ertragen? OliverTwist78 (talk) 10:26, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Wieviel du ertragen kannst, weiß ich nicht. Lassen wir mal Erik weg. Wenn du etwas in die englische Wikipedia bringst, muss es - und zwar inline - belegt sein. (Ja, ich weiß, wird nicht immer beachtet, ist aber eine gute Regel.) Was nicht belegt ist, darf einfach entfernt werden, - das ist kein Missbrauch, sondern ist einfach so. Leider sind die Belege im deutschen Artikel überwiegend nicht mehr online verfügbar, aber eine Quelle dort ist gut. Wenn du willst, kann ich die in den englischen Artikel bringen, und danach du die Fakten, die sie belegt. Eine Inhaltsangabe braucht überhaupt keinen Beleg, das ist etwas, was viele nicht wissen, vielleicht auch Erik nicht. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Mercedes-Benz W463 concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mercedes-Benz W463, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Mercedes-Benz W463
[edit]Hello, OliverTwist78. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mercedes-Benz W463".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:34, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
About The W223 AMG
[edit]Hello I'm Alireza (User: Rahmani9783),First of All,I Didn't Remove The W223 AMG Section on Purpose,Second of All I Edited it on Production Month,January 2021,Let Me Give Some Specific Reasons To You: 1-First of All I Didn't Remove The W223 AMG Section on Purpose. 2-Second of All I Edited it on Production Month,January 2021. 3-Third of All,If You Think I Removed it,You Are 100% Wrong,Find A User Who Has Domain IP Address or Username That Deleted on Purpose And That's My Objection To You,So Do Not Take Someone Who has Edited But Not Removed The Section. Don't Get Me Wrong,I Didn't Remove The Mercedes-AMG Section W223 Page on Purpose,That's All. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahmani9783 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
I Have Some Evidence For You.
[edit]It's Me Again (User: Rahmani9783),Someone Deleted on The W223 AMG Section on Purpose is (User: 182.30.222.134) That's My Evidence,I Repeat User: 182.30.222.134,I Repeat Again User: 182.30.222.134 Do Not Hesitate To Contact Me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahmani9783 (talk • contribs) 06:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)