User talk:Olickal Peter Thomas

Welcome!

Hello, Olickal Peter Thomas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Rajamudy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 03:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The IPC Church.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:The IPC Church.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Rajamudy CR Church.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rajamudy CR Church.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Neriamangalam bridge.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Neriamangalam bridge.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I am really new to Wikipedia, not reading, but writing one. I have seen many pages with wrong and simply with two or three lines. It is to show that "I am an Article writer", by many. I really fed up with such people and so I wrote firstly "Rajamudy" and then "Pazhampillichal" with credentials and evidences, trying to avoid any type of errors. It is a humble effort to show how one has to create a page or article. Of course articles are edited and Wikipedia is a collective one, contributed by many. But I do not know much of the Wikipedia editing, image adding, use of talk pages etc. Hence it is my humble request that kindly help me in my mistakes. Recently R'n'B corrected me of using link to "English" that not to use "English" instead "English language". Thank You

And how to delete the wrong or unwanted 'images' uploaded, please tell me. Thanking You.

17:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Peter Thomas Olickal

Hello, Peter Thomas Olickal, and thank you for joining us in building Wikipedia. From looking at your two impressive articles, I can see that you have gained a good understanding of both the conventions used on Wikipedia and the markup used to achieve the necessary formatting and layout. I've made a few minor changes to the articles, which I hope you are happy with. When I first started editing, I learnt a lot from looking at the code behind existing pages, and I guess you have done the same. I'm happy to help you if you have specific questions – just leave a question at the bottom of my talk page. I usually login to Wikipedia at least twice each week, so I will respond within a few days.

With regard to getting things deleted, it's my understanding that you just edit the page and put {{Db-author}} on there (see this section entitled "G7. Author requests deletion" for more details). I know this works for articles, and I expect it would work for images too.

Best wishes, and thank you :) Regards — Hebrides (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Pulayan.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Pulayan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 08:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheramar Christians

Hi, I'm sorry but there is so much wrong with Cheramar Christians that I really do not know where to start in explaining the issues. Things such as What a humiliation and violation of Human Rights – cow dung is more pure than fellow-human beings and the same the harvest of these human beings’ hard-work can be eaten no “untouchables” in it – incongruous, and delusory practices!!!, however, are completely inappropriate and it also looks to me as if you may have copied chunks of the text from other places. You are using sources that are not reliable, such as Logan's Malabar Manual, and you had entire sections for things that really are better covered elsewhere, in articles such as Dalit.

I doubt very much there will be much left of your article by the time I have fixed it, so please do not be surprised if it ends up pointing to Pulayar (which is in fact what most of your sources call them anyway). - Sitush (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Olickal Peter Thomas. You have new messages at Hebrides's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Peter Thomas 08:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sri Gowthami Degree and PG College

added links pointing to National, Civil, Prakasam, Intermediate and Junior

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SGC in Social Work.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SGC in Social Work.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SGC Disaster Relief.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SGC Disaster Relief.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Peter T.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Peter T.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SGC College.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SGC College.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cheramar.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Cheramar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SGC Campus.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SGC Campus.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rajamudy

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rajamudy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

page already exists at Rajamudy

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vin09 (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coastal Voluntary Network

Hello, Olickal Peter Thomas

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Coastal Voluntary Network for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bensci54 (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be specific, you have repeatedly uploaded images which are copyright violations, created inappropriately promotional articles, and otherwise been editing inappropriately. It appears that you are either unable or unwilling to learn how to follow the policies which apply to editing Wikipedia. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help I have been blocked

Dear All,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olickal Peter Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked due to repeated image uploading, as the reasons stated; to say disruptive editing. Actually after creating the article i tried to upload a logo (Image), but it was not visible on the page; and the first two time the "target file name" and the original file name of the image were different. And even after correcting the name, the image did not appear on the page and so I have uploaded again the image. ACTUALLY I did not know it would create such a "vandalism" to the standard guidelines of Wikipedia! And I am a learner and new to Wikipedia. And you all may teach and correct me generously so that I may also be with you in this World's Largest Online Source of unique information! And so I hereby humbly beg and plead your magnanimity and benevolence to unblock me with an assurance that I will never be so again in the future. Peter Thomas (talk) 04:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

None of this addresses the problems with your editing. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help I have been blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olickal Peter Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do now know whether I can make again a help request to unblock! If I am not privileged so, kindly forgive and excuse me. Now I understood that why I was blocked. My uploading of images without proposer copy right claim of my own to articles is the prime reason. And kindly see my contributions are not of promotional ones. Mostly I wrote about places. Of course I did not take much care in learning the uploading of images etc. And now on wards, I will be extra cautious and will not repeat the same mistakes. And also kindly consider that I have not deleted or modified or added any inappropriate contents or caused any vandalism to Wikipedia. And so kindly give me a single chance or one more chance to be with you all. Peter Thomas (talk) 07:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 14:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request to Kindly Review my "Block from Editing"

It is hereby humbly requested to all to kindly help me in my editing block. I repeatedly state here that i will not repeat my mistakes that caused me from blocked from editing Wikipedia; Disruptive Editing. Actually none of my editing or creating articles intentionally to disturb or cause any vandalism to Wikipedia or promotional contents creation. the fact is that I did not spent much time to learn "editing" or "creating articles" in the procedures set by Wikipedia. And so it is hereby again humbly requested to all administrators and seniors to give me one more chance to be part of Wikipedia community as anyone. Help me generously--Peter Thomas (talk) 15:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Kindly Review my "Block"

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olickal Peter Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As per the Wikipedia's "Disruptive Editing" category description, I humbly make here that I have not caused any type of vandalism or destroying any potential articles in wikipedia or even any article or any of such "Vandalism"; I have only repeatedly failed din uploading images. And also again with a earnest request to all the administrators and authorities to kindly lift my "block"--Peter Thomas (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. $Salvio$ 16:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olickal Peter Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I think and plead that my block from editing Wikipedia is no longer necessary, for I understood what is the reason of blocking me from editing Wikipedia, I have gone through the Standard guidelines of Wikiepdia in editing articles, How to upload Images to pages, What is Standard Articles of Wikipedia (Wikipedia articles and "promotional" types of articles), types of disruptive edits, causing vandalism etc. And so it is appealed to all to kindly lift my block Peter Thomas (talk) 12:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here is some advice on how to make it more likely that your unblock request will succeed, because I'm afraid I don't think your present request stands much chance at all. I see that above you stated that your editing has not been promotional. However, you have created several articles or drafts which really were unambiguously promotional. If you honestly cannot see why they were promotional then you will not be able to avoid making the same mistake again. I therefore advise you that if you are to have any realistic chance of being unblocked you will need to show that you do understand how some of your editing has been promotional. Please note the word "show", not "say": all too often blocked editors say that they understand why they are blocked, but in fact don't understand, so that if they are unblocked they go ahead and make the same mistakes again, with the result that they are quickly re-blocked. For that reason you should explain what about your editing makes it promotional, so as to show that you understand, rather than just saying that you understand. JBW (talk) 21:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Uwe Gustafsson

Hello, Olickal Peter Thomas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Uwe Gustafsson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Page "Uwe Gustafsson"

I created an article about Uwe Gustafsson, a Canadian Linguistic who spent his whole life among the Adivasis (PTGs) of Eastern Ghats in Andhra Pradesh, India. He wrote many articles on dravidian languages and An Adivasi Oriya Dictionary too. Such great scholarly personalities should have page in Wikipedia, (Not movie heroes or such people alone). Forget about my "mistakes" I made in blocking me from editing Wikipedia (Disruptive editing, I appealed many time, but still I am not able to create articles). I beg here than anyone may write an article about the Great Person Uwe Gustafsson. I do not know him personally, but I came to know him when I went to work among the communities whom he and his family served for more than 40 years! And so please don't delete the article about him. Please, somebody may write an article about him. --Peter Thomas (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olickal Peter Thomas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked from editing Wikipedia articles or creating articles due to Disruptive Editing. Now I understood the reason why I am blocked. And thus I humbly request here to unblock me, with an assurance that I will never and ever repeat the mistake again--Peter Thomas (talk) 16:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can't be unblocked until you tell us exactly how you were disruptive and what steps you will take to change in the future. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request to Kindly Review my "Block from Editing"

I have been blocked from creating articles or contributing to Wikipedia due to disruptive editing. Now I understood the reason for the same was that I created article as of paid advertisement like article, which has no use for Wikipedia's standard encyclopedia articles/pages; or against its standard policy of creating articles. And so I humbly request here to review my "Block from Editing" and allow me to contribute to Wikipedia as anyone of you. I assure you all that I will never repeat the mistake again. Help me --Peter Thomas (talk) 10:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sri Gowthami Degree and PG College llogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sri Gowthami Degree and PG College llogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]