User talk:Olab2000

Welcome!

Hello, Olab2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Kyiv school of Ukrainian language, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CardinalDan (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kyiv school of Ukrainian language

A tag has been placed on Kyiv school of Ukrainian language, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kyiv school of Ukrainian language

A tag has been placed on Kyiv school of Ukrainian language requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oleksandr Labinsky

A tag has been placed on Oleksandr Labinsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Burpelson AFB (talk) 22:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oleksandr Labinsky

A tag has been placed on Oleksandr Labinsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Burpelson AFB (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Beloved Freak 23:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Svidotstvo1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Svidotstvo1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 22:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Labinsky Oleksandr

A tag has been placed on Labinsky Oleksandr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Xtzou (Talk) 21:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest guideline

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 22:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Slovyan

Hello Olab2000, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Slovyan, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Kotniski. This has been done because the page is a recently created article that that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Kotniski. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Kotniski (talk · contribs) 12:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

Hi, you seem to be using Wikipedia as a kind of self-promotion site for your school and your invented term "Slovyan". There are probably many other websites that you can use for this purpose, but Wikipedia doesn't really exist for that sort of thing - it's for recording information about things that are already widely reported in reliable sources. The information you add about your personal things will end up being deleted sooner or later, so you'll just end up having wasted your (and other people's) time. Of course, you're very welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia (see WP:5P as a starting point for learning how to do this), and I wish you success with your business.--Kotniski (talk) 15:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Slovyan

Ok. I'll find it in a dictionary. You know, there is no certainty of using this or that version. So I propose to give versions for the time being.--Olab2000 (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Poles in the United States

Given your high fluency in Polish and Ukrainian, I am reaching out to you in regards to the History of the Poles in the United States article. It has no other language equivalent, and any time you can spend towards translating in any capacity would be much-appreciated. I would be more than happy to help any way that I can.

Thank you! Pola.mola (talk) 20:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 1

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 16:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. It is my page. Why did you delete message on my discussion page? Olab2000 (talk) 08:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By accident, initially - but then I saw that you were preaching, which isn't allowed here, so I left it. Also, I'm not watching your Talk page, so in future don't place messages here if you want me to see them.Deb (talk) 09:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Preaching? 😀 sounds good. I just add an important event which happened on the 1st january AD1. This day is the corner stone of our calendar. If we doubt the date of Jesus' birth and circumcision then we doubt all the historical events. Actually we doubt the very calendar and the today's date. Olab2000 (talk) 15:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Birth of Jesus, as assigned by Dionysius Exiguus in his anno Domini era according to most scholars took place in 1 BC. One week before the incarnation (revelation of the God's name) . Olab2000 (talk) 16:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"according to most scholars" - no, not according to most scholars. See Nativity of Jesus and Chronology of Jesus for more accurate content. Besides which, you specifically referred to it as the date of his circumcision, which is unlikely to have been on the same day as his birth. You didn't add the requisite citation, because there isn't one. Deb (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luke 2:21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.

http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bible.kingjamesbiblelite Olab2000 (talk) 06:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This day is the cornerstone. Olab2000 (talk) 06:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in the Bible is it suggested that he was born on 1st January (most countries celebrate his birth in December), and even if 1st January were taken as his birthdate, eight days from that would mean 8th or 9th January for circumcision, so the stuff you've been adding is wrong on all counts. Do not add any more rubbish to the encyclopedia. Deb (talk) 10:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Anno Domini dating system was devised in AD 525 by Dionysius Exiguus. In this system the first day is not birthday but the day of giving the name. The birthday accordingly was one week before that is 25 december 1BC Olab2000 (talk) 18:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first year AD

According to the Dionysius Exiguus the first day of the year (the day of Name of God) was Tuesday because the 25 december (when Jesus was born) was Tuesday. It is mentioned in his argument XV. Then in 1582 the Grigorius XIII made an adjustment: ten days ahead. So, october 4 was sunday. And then accordingly the monday was the 15. Because in my Huaway the calendar shows bug: when you press the month the 15 follows the 4, but in the whole year those ten days are not excluded. Olab2000 (talk) 21:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 1 January. You have already been warned about disruptive editing on this page. Please refrain from adding unsourced, controversial content. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 19:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]