Jump to content

User talk:Pola.mola

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Pola.mola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 00:47, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Poster 2.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 04:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Poles are incensed.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Poles are incensed.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Poles in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IWW, Nativism and Ed Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:24, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Poles in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jamestown Polish craftsmen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creative license (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

[edit]
Thank you for your recent articles, including Jamestown Polish craftsmen, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Hello and welcome Pola.mola! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Poles in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the Poles in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in America to 1908: Part Four: Poles in the Central and Western States,'' Edited by James S. Pula (The Catholic University of America Press, 2001, originally published in 1908; [http://www.ceeol.com/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Poles in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babushka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

[edit]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:30, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Polish American Contractors Builders Association) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Polish American Contractors Builders Association, Pola.mola!

Wikipedia editor Dr. Kadzi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add some sources or references for the information.

To reply, leave a comment on Dr. Kadzi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

The article Ben Adamowski has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PinkBull 18:58, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Polish American Contractors Builders Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This unreferenced stub does not make any claim of notability. Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:46, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Advocates Society of Polish-American Attorneys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This stub does not make any claim of notability. Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:46, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to request userfication of those entries so your work is not wasted, and once you find better sources, you could return to improve them. There are thousands of valid Polish-American topics to create/expand, but it's worth checking WP:NOT to see what cannot be included in Wikipedia (encyclopedias are not yellow pages, etc.). Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leon Jastremski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chantilly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

[edit]
Thank you for your recent articles, including John Sobieski (U.S. Colonel), which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

[edit]
Thank you for your recent articles, including John Sobieski (U.S. Colonel), which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. This can help you too, as the WikiProject members will often defend your work from deletion and try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Error?

[edit]

I hope I am correct with [1]. If so, it probably s should be Młotkowski anyway, not Mlotkowski. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hunky Culture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in the coal regions of Pennsylvania and West Virginia, where [[Poles]] and other Slavic immigrants ([[Hungarian people|Hungarian]]s (Magyar), [[Rusyns|Rusyn]]s, [[Slovak people|Slovak]]s came to

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of the Poles in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Silesian
John Sobieski (U.S. Colonel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Emperor Maximilian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category

[edit]

Hello. Please stop adding the category American people of Polish descent to pages that already have the subcategory National Polish-American Sports Hall of Fame inductees. Thank you.Hoops gza (talk) 03:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, anyone in any of the American Sportspeople of Polish descent categories (example - Category:American basketball players of Polish descent) are already in this category and do not need he parent category added. Rikster2 (talk) 02:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The National Polish American Sports Hall of Fame inductees includes Canadians. It is by no means a direct or closely related category to Americans of Polish descent. The Americans of Polish descent category is immutable - Polish ethnic background is genetic and cannot be taken back, which is something that can't be said about an NFL championship or inductee, for instance. In some pages such as Mike Ditka, it is inconsistent and confusing to leave only the category about his Ukrainian roots while leaving the Hall of Fame category to identify his Polish roots. Other exceptions could include a non-ethnic Pole who emigrated from Poland to the United States. Could that person make the Polish American Hall of Fame? Yes, if inducted by the hall. Would that person be a person of Polish descent? No.Pola.mola (talk) 02:43, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My point still stands about those in the American Sportspeople of Polish descent categories. Please do not also add "Americans of Polish descent" to those articles. Thanks Rikster2 (talk) 02:48, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why can't they have both?Pola.mola (talk) 03:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What purpose? Every "American basketball player of Polish descent" is by definition an "American person of Polish decent." The categories are already in that parent category. Wikipedia guidelines (see WP:SUBCAT) are "A page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category." What is the compelling reason that this case should be an exception? Rikster2 (talk) 12:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pola.mola, you have created a lot of extra work.Hoops gza (talk) 16:43, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Mike Ditka is already in the subcategory Category:American players of American football of Polish descent. Please stop adding these categories to pages.Hoops gza (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polish American Contractors Builders Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish American Contractors Builders Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:George HW in Hamtramck.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:George HW in Hamtramck.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Poles in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nicholas I and Pulaski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Edziu Sixtus Marciszewski.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Edziu Sixtus Marciszewski.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poland–United States relations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nicholas I and Pulaski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Felix Wardzinski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Once there was a soldier" - no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucyan Bójnowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
I award you your first barnstar for your continued edits to Wikipedia, particularly on the Polish-American history. They are very appreciated! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Poles in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The John Gawlik House.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The John Gawlik House.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Tyssowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice stub. If you were to expand it by another 100 words or so, and add inline citations, it could make a good WP:DYK - I'd be happy to help you nominated it at T:TDYK. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:55, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Poles in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provincial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Felix Wardzinski.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Felix Wardzinski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Leon Jastremski.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Leon Jastremski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:39, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Poles in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burgesses (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job creating this article. It is WP:DYK ready if you'd like to nominate it. Let me know if you'd need any assistance with that, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that looks like a nice hook. Let me know if you have any troubles with nomination (instructions are at T:TDYK). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the Poles in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in the colony by 1620.<ref>http://withgoodreasonradio.org/2007/01/global-jamestown-and-the-poles/ (Radio program on Global Jamestown</ref> In 1947, a historical memoir, '''[[Pamiętnik handlowca]]'''
  • in America to 1908: Part Four: Poles in the Central and Western States,'' Edited by James S. Pula (The Catholic University of America Press, 2001, originally published in 1908; [http://www.ceeol.com/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edward Pinkowski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 21:31, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Edward Pinkowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appear to be non-notable writer. References are not specifically about author. Appears to fail WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 02:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edward Pinkowski for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Pinkowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Pinkowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 02:26, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In case you don't know the procedure, you are expected to comment in the deletion discussion, in addition to any comment's left on article's talk. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Zabriskie

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hirolovesswords. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Steve Zabriskie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of interest

[edit]

You may find this initiative of interest: Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leon Jastremski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Racial separatism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dr. Cukrowicz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Piguy101 (talk) 03:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for resolving the problem. Piguy101 (talk) 03:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

[edit]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Robb Topolski, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such article. I'd suggest starting one at pl:Historia Polonii w Stanach Zjednoczonych. There is a bit of content at pl:Polonia_w_Stanach_Zjednoczonych#Historia you can expand, and you should link your article from it when you start it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just placed a hint on the discussion page of pl:Polonia_w_Stanach_Zjednoczonych pointing to History of the Poles in the United States. I hope this way round someone who is insterested in translation and equipped with the necessary time can be found more easily. --Ben4Wiki (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As User:Piotrus has already stated there is no specific article describing the history on the Polish Wikipedia (equivalent to History of the Poles in the United States) so far. There is only the general one (pl:Polonia_w_Stanach_Zjednoczonych). By the way, I fully support User:Piotrus's suggestion for the title of the missing article. --Ben4Wiki (talk) 19:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ben4Wiki: I noticed the comment at pl:Dyskusja:Polonia_w_Stanach_Zjednoczonych#Historia_Poloniii_w_Stanach_Zjednoczonych. Unfortunately, Polish Wikipedia being even smaller then English has only few hundred active volunteers, and I doubt people will see that comment there. You could try to bring it to the attention of some active Polish editors, but the only one I can think of that likes to create such content is User:Halibutt. I'd suggest that if anyone is interested in this, they should start the article. Saying others should do it is, sadly, unlikely to lead to any real change. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paper soccer

[edit]

Hello! Do you have got any sources or relevant informations about popularize paper soccer game (version on 8x10 squares) in North America by polish imigrants? Regards. Dawid2009 (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I urdenstand. If you want I can help you in develop for example article Clarinet Polka. It has got not precisly description. Clarinet Polka really isn't from Poland, but is very popular in Poland, and probably polish Americans popularized it in US. Thanks. Dawid2009 (talk) 17:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I'm trying to correct your page pl:Wikipedysta:Pola.mola/Historia Polaków w Stanach Zjednoczonych. On plwiki. What you think about it? Dawid2009 (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I have corected your version on PLWiki, but I can't urdenstand two sentences: Znaczna socjologiczne badania i prace, jak Chłop polski w Europie i Ameryce, że wielu polskich imigrantów wspólne wspólny cel kiedyś posiadania ziemi w USA lub z powrotem w Polsce. Ustawodawstwo anty-słowiański cięcie polskiej imigracji od 1921 do II wojny światowej, ale otworzył się po II wojnie światowej do obejmują wiele przesiedlonych osób z Holokaustu. This is in polish quite urdenstaldable. Can you explain me what this expression mean? Thanks. Dawid2009 (talk) 19:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of Polish-American Medal of Honor recipients, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.bing.com/knows/List%20of%20Medal%20of%20Honor%20recipients%20for%20the%20Vietnam%20War?mkt=zh-cn.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History of Polish-Americans

[edit]

Hey, just making sure you're getting [my response there] Feel free to delete after you see it, obviously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IDiO (talkcontribs) 12:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Old Polish woman on farm.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old Polish woman on farm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Pola.mola. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Congressman Kleczka.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Congressman Kleczka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Derdowski.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Derdowski.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Pola.mola. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Susan Bysiewicz APAC 2014.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Susan Bysiewicz APAC 2014.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 22:34, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Pola.mola. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Barzynski,Vincent.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Barzynski,Vincent.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bielaski family has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Bielaski family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST

[edit]
You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/

-- Environment of New York City Task Force - Wil540 art (talk) 21:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]