User talk:Oficinalis

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Oficinalis! Thank you for your contributions. I am Kleuske and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Kleuske (talk) 10:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oficinalis, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Oficinalis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from SNK European Democrats. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 21:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Vusamazulu Credo Mutwa, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:49, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cocainaenvenenada, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

- Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for repeatedly adding reference spam (for Ismael Ogando) on multiple articles. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalising my contributions illiterated idiot.Oficinalis (talk) 22:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Being indefinitely blocked from editing the English language Wikipedia, as you are, means that any new user account you create can be blocked, any articles you create can be deleted, and any edits you make can be reverted. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have no argument for suggesting deletion, what is you argument about the encyclopaedic relevance of this page? Totally unfounded, you are just an idiot with too mcuh time in hands a little brains. Go play some video-games and leave wikipedia to the professionals. Oficinalis (talk) 22:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You must confuse me with someone else, I'm a grandfather and don't play videogames. Im also not as easily fooled as you seem to think (when you repeatedly post fake user warnings and a fake block notice on my talk page...). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Cocainaenvenenada (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oficinalis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Being target of vandalism by unprofessional people abusing editor privileges in Wikipedia. Oficinalis (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.