Jump to content

User talk:Oceanchaos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On your info on Myles Gaskin, you have his yards per rush in college at 102.4, that’s impossible. You might want to check that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9001:190D:F300:E4E2:53AF:288B:D562 (talk) 15:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fixed it, should have been rushing yards per game. Thanks!

Oceanchaos, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Oceanchaos!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:55, Friday, November 22, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together


Your submission at Articles for creation: 'Umayri has been accepted

[edit]
'Umayri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Janice Merrill Allred concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Janice Merrill Allred, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Janice Merrill Allred

[edit]

Hello, Oceanchaos. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Janice Merrill Allred".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 12:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergei Chernikov has been accepted

[edit]
Sergei Chernikov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Oceanchaos! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:34, Thursday, July 7, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neophoca palatina has been accepted

[edit]
Neophoca palatina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludwig Berwald has been accepted

[edit]
Ludwig Berwald, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 00:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating article on Ludwig Berwald

[edit]

Many thanks for creating the article on the mathematician! I noticed you created it after I was pruning lists and saw the blue link on the MacTutor archive list of missing mathematicians here: Wikipedia:MacTutor archive. If you ever feel like creating any more mathematician articles, feel free to take inspiration from this list. :) Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are certainly welcome! I have indeed been going through this list (I created Sergei Chernikov's page a few days ago), but I am very new to all this, and I'm not sure if I should be pruning lists myself, or waiting for editors? Oceanchaos (talk) 21:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, there is no need for you to trouble yourself with the pruning (although you are of course allowed to remove blue links from the lists if you see articles created and lead to the right article). You can leave that to the gnome's of Wikipedia, such as me, while the real important work of creating articles that are well written and referenced, such as the ones that you have done. All the best!Calaka (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Sergei Nikolaevich Chernikov

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Sergei Nikolaevich Chernikov at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 05:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Razmadze has been accepted

[edit]
Andrea Razmadze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rietrik Polén has been accepted

[edit]
Rietrik Polén, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mduvekot (talk) 18:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sergei Nikolaevich Chernikov

[edit]

On 23 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sergei Nikolaevich Chernikov, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that mathematician Sergei Nikolaevich Chernikov already had the first of his five department chairs before defending his DSc in 1940? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sergei Nikolaevich Chernikov. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sergei Nikolaevich Chernikov), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Arazmadze.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Arazmadze.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The source, as stated twice in the description, is Wikipedia itself (ka.wiki); the image is taken from the article about Razmadze in his native Georgian. [image here]. You would know better than I which category of fair-use that falls under, but it didn't seem clear from the upload page, nor from the pages above. However, if the image is fair-use on ka.wiki, I would assume it is fair-use on en.wiki as well, because "English language pages, are hosted on a server in the United States, so U.S. law governs". I am probably not the only person who will ever have this question, so perhaps an FAQ about using other.wiki images would be helpful? Oceanchaos (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Arazmadze.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Arazmadze.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Francis Pretty) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Francis Pretty, Oceanchaos!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added a few extra sources and a category.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Oceanchaos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luoxia Hong

[edit]

Hello Oceanchaos,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Luoxia Hong for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 TT me 21:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chrysoblephus puniceus has been accepted

[edit]
Chrysoblephus puniceus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful

[edit]

Please be careful what you link to when adding new links to Wikipedia. The material you added to Cincinnati Bengals contained literally several dozen links that did not go to articles about Cincinnati Bengals football players. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing all those links. Short of actually clicking on every single player's name, is there a quick way to tell which links are going to a disambiguation page? Oceanchaos (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Giant grouper page update

[edit]

Dear Oceanchaos,

I recently found out through a google search that I'm now famous as a journal article I wrote has been cited on Wikipedia! Turns out that it was you. Would just like to say thank you for updating the giant grouper page and an even bigger thank you for reading my journal article. I'm a PhD student and haven't published much at all yet, so it is nice to know that at least someone other than my supervisors and my mum read it haha.

I clicked on your link (obviously) to find out who had made the edit and am very curious about you. We have a lot in common. Would you be averse to me getting in touch via email? I've just made a Wiki account and don't know all the ins and outs of communication between users so hope this is the correct method to open dialogue.

Kind regards, Dave

Brightdave (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: franchise records

[edit]

Concerning your questions at WT:NFL regarding franchise leaders, I'll probably have a lot of opinions on it, so I'll get back to you when I have time/have digested it. Lizard (talk) 07:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Owen Marecic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phil Taylor and Greg Little. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint Meinrad Seminary and School of Theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Candler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry Fitzgerald, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Johnson (American football) and Walk-off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Davante Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Randall Cobb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to LaDainian Tomlinson ‎, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Oceanchaos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holton Ahlers (November 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Does not pass WP:ATHLETE. Only one independent reliable source with significant coverage cited.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
• Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Oceanchaos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holton Ahlers (November 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vincent60030 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The first section is already promotional after reading. Please rephrase and cut out unnecessary content
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 14:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Oceanchaos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 14:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derrick Mason, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Simon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Davante Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walk-off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Payton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Holton Ahlers

[edit]

Hello, Oceanchaos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holton Ahlers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:46, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ryan Grant (running back), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Randall Cobb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of This Tender Land

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of This Tender Land at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 20:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oceanchaos, please go to the nomination page to address the concerns raised there. Thanks! Z1720 (talk) 01:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Aha! That's why I couldn't join the thread. Thanks for the help. Oceanchaos (talk) 15:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

[edit]
For your work improving This Tender Land! BuySomeApples (talk) 05:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the pie! That's a wonderful thing to do after buying some apples. Oceanchaos (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK hook for This Tender Land

[edit]

Hey, I wanted to respond to your question here, because typically when a DYK is promoted editors are discouraged from having a conversation on that page. I don't think readers will assume that the book was written in the 1930s, as there are many books that are written recently that take place decades in the past. I typically like shorter hooks because I think they will keep the audience's attention more effectively (with our tik toc generation, short and snappy hooks tend to be better). I don't mind adding the year back in, but I would probably just put it back to where it was. With all of this considered, would you like to have 2019 placed back in the hook? Z1720 (talk) 01:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think yes. The phrase "depression-era novel" still reads as ambiguous without context to me. Oceanchaos (talk) 03:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for This Tender Land

[edit]

On 16 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article This Tender Land, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that This Tender Land is a retelling of Huckleberry Finn set in the 1930s and incorporating elements of Homer's Odyssey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/This Tender Land. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, This Tender Land), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romanovka (inhabited locality), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanovka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stan Poray has been accepted

[edit]
Stan Poray, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo + c 03:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefano Pieri has been accepted

[edit]
Stefano Pieri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee U. Bennion (September 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 21:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Oceanchaos&oldid=1258278959"