User talk:OceanHok/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

DYK for Sniper Elite 4

On 12 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sniper Elite 4, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sniper Elite 4 was designed to be a "sniper paradise"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sniper Elite 4. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sniper Elite 4), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Un.... Hey.

Can you add the games at Bethesda's second E3 press conference to Electronic Entertainment Expo 2016's List of confirmed games? --GameTimeFan2016 (talk) 04:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done AdrianGamer (talk) 04:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok! Can you also add a few more details of the Xbox press conference and everything that happened at the Ubisoft and PC Gaming Show press conferences to the E3 2016 page? --GameTimeFan2016 (talk) 00:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Watch Dogs 2

Hello! Your submission of Watch Dogs 2 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

For Honor

AdrianGamer Look, wiki pages should be about information as accurate as possible, if any media mentions or uses references from any area which exists in real life, then those information should be evaluated because they hold water, for example; in this game they use Vikings as one of their armies, this is not make-believe so if they use facts from history, they should take criticisms if any arises, if you feel like it doesn't apply to this game, then you are acting in a bias way towards the game developers, not only is this wrong, it also misinforms the game's players as to what the Vikings actually looked like (or what history has taught us what they might have looked like) by creating this wiki page, you have made an agreement not to be bias and take evidence where-ever it lays, if you say that this does not apply to the game itself, then add information instead of writing 'Pretentious nitpickery' as this shows blatant disregard to wiki's intentions to publish true information and to the people who want to learn, either stick to wiki rules or you will be reported — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hogyncymru (talk • contribs) 15:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@Hogyncymru: they should take criticisms if any arises - If there are criticism, this can be added. I don't mind, as long as it is not an independent criticism section, and is talking about the game instead of all these history stuff. But there isn't any. It isn't our responsibility to cover the truth, our responsibility is to cover what the sources says. Verifiability is more important than truth. The "Pretentious nitpickery" heading was not written by me. It was written by an IP. Currently there is no source claiming that there are inaccuracies, and claiming that it has is original research, which is a Wikipedia policy that everyone should follow. AdrianGamer (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@AdrianGamer: they use 'viking' as their source, that's all you need, if they called them something else, then this conversation would not happen, my edits will remain but, because you want things differently, I'll mention more about the connection, i'm sure neither of us want this to go further, so that's the compromise, I hope that will settle our disagreements.

@Hogyncymru: - No, we need to have sources that say "For Honor has inaccuracies". Without that, everything there is original research. And to be honest, this is a fantasy game. The game's basic premise is absolutely not based on history. Apollyon manipulating the three factions, Vikings attack Samurai and fight with the Knight? I don't know why we need a section to talk about Viking not wearing a helmet. AdrianGamer (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@AdrianGamer: Hey, I iunderstand where your coming from, 'game equals make-believe', I get that, what I'm conserned about is the use of the name 'Viking', they used a real reference and then twisted it, therefore no longer becomes Viking, that is why I mentioned that there is a difference between game and reality, nobody is saying there is inaccuracies in the gameplay itself, all I'm saying is, there were inaccuracies in the research of what a Viking looks like from an artistic point of view, I'm not taking anything away from the game itself, I'm only pointing out that there is hard evidence to support that this make-believe vision of Vikings has been used for over 150 years and it is this that I'm referring to, please see what I see, I cannot make this any more clear, thanks

Moved to Talk:For Honor § Inaccuracies

Your GA nomination of Crysis 3

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crysis 3 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Famous Hobo -- Famous Hobo (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Steep (video game)

Hello! Your submission of Steep (video game) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Watch Dogs 2

On 19 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Watch Dogs 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ubisoft Montreal intended to take risks when creating Watch Dogs 2? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Watch Dogs 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Watch Dogs 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crysis 3

The article Crysis 3 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Crysis 3 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Famous Hobo -- Famous Hobo (talk) 04:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Steep (video game)

On 24 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Steep (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ubisoft Annecy consulted professional skiers and extreme sports experts when creating Steep? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Steep (video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Steep (video game)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

HEY!!!!

You think i blocked!! put then back!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.124.94.155 (talk) 10:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

@86.124.94.155: - Is it not going to happen, unless they really announced the title, which seems highly unlikely. I have warned you several times already. If you are not going to stop, I will have to request an admin to semi-protect the page from your hoaxes. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Reverted Civilization Beyond Earth Rising Tide edit

The article went through the Articles for Creation process and was an official article. If you want to delete it, you should make it go through the Articles for Deletion process. Oldag07 (talk) 22:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Rising Tide Articles for Deletion Page

The page Civilization: Beyond Earth - Rising Tide has been nominated for deletion. You have been invited to participate in the discussion Oldag07 (talk) 23:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quantum Break

Hello, AdrianGamer, I'm a member of the Guild of Copyeditors Thnidu (talk) 04:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

I really did let the page go for a couple of weeks, being very busy with my daughter just back from Asia and going back there soon, but I'm working in finishing it up now.

Got a question for you. From Quantum Break § Release:

Alan Wake, along with its DLC The Signal and The Writer, as well as American Nightmare, would be available for free for players who purchased the game through backward compatibility.

What the **** is "DLC"? The DAB (disambiguation) page DLC has nothing helpful about it, and the source cited for the statement doesn't mention the abbreviation. --Thnidu (talk) 06:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thnidu: Thank you very much for working on the article. It is actually downloadable content (DLC). The source calls them "add-on packs". AdrianGamer (talk) 07:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Great, thanks. I'll pipe-link it. --Thnidu (talk) 07:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

AdrianGamer, it is done. Whew! Please check it over, because I don't know the game and am not a video gamer... though I just might be interested in this one! --Thnidu (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thnidu: Thanks! However, the reception section does not seem to be worked on. Would you mind copyediting that section as well? AdrianGamer (talk) 08:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

@AdrianGamer: Not surprising, I was jumping around all over. If I can stay awake (4:30 am local), otherwise when I'm awake again (tomorrow personal :-) ). --Thnidu (talk) 08:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

@AdrianGamer: "The platforming section received mixed reviews." What's that? --Thnidu (talk) 08:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Never mind, I'll link it. 08:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

@AdrianGamer: Computer very slow, have to powercycle it. And myself; finish tomorrow. --Thnidu (talk) 08:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

References

Your GA nomination of From Dust

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article From Dust you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 20:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of From Dust

The article From Dust you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:From Dust for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 10:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of From Dust

The article From Dust you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:From Dust for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

PlatinumGames

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article PlatinumGames has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dead Island announcement trailer

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dead Island announcement trailer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dead Island announcement trailer

The article Dead Island announcement trailer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dead Island announcement trailer for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2017 in video gaming page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dead Island announcement trailer

The article Dead Island announcement trailer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dead Island announcement trailer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Game genres

I've always written down genres into video game articles from what the sources say, but where should I write the genres as based on gameplay? Lead, infobox or gameplay section, or all? Just to clarify. Cognissonance (talk) 15:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cognissonance: - The genres listed in the infobox should be game genres, stuff like action-adventure game, action role-playing game, racing game, interactive movie etc. It should be based on gameplay, not its theme. Stuff like "neo-noir" and "thriller" should be mentioned in the lead. AdrianGamer (talk) 15:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mad Max (2015 video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mad Max (2015 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mad Max (2015 video game)

The article Mad Max (2015 video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mad Max (2015 video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mad Max (2015 video game)

The article Mad Max (2015 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mad Max (2015 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Avalanche Studios exterior.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Avalanche Studios exterior.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Iron Galaxy Studios logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iron Galaxy Studios logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of PlatinumGames

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article PlatinumGames you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 12:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Metro: Last Light

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Metro: Last Light has been completed.

You might want to go through the Development Section to make sure that its content is in chronological order.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Thank you very much for the copyedit! AdrianGamer (talk) 03:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of PlatinumGames

The article PlatinumGames you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:PlatinumGames for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 09:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Platinum

Nice, the article became a GA. Also, I wanted to contact you that another Platinum article was nominated to GA by an anon, Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance. Do think it can also become a GA or that it needs more work. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I think it is close to reaching the GA status (It looks like an in-depth article). However I agree that it needs some refinements before getting promoted, especially with the release section. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:08, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Mad Max (2015 video game)

On 17 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mad Max (2015 video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that to promote Mad Max, Warner Bros invited artists to create artwork on their vehicles with dust, and partnered with Uber for a free ride special offer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mad Max (2015 video game). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mad Max (2015 video game)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Quantum Break

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Quantum Break you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 15:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Quantum Break

The article Quantum Break you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Quantum Break for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Skylanders: Imaginators

Hello! Your submission of Skylanders: Imaginators at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Josh Milburn (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for PlatinumGames

On 24 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article PlatinumGames, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to Atsushi Inaba, the development of Bayonetta almost "broke" PlatinumGames? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PlatinumGames. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, PlatinumGames), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Electronic Arts logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Electronic Arts logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sunmist (talk) 15:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Quantum Break Bridge scene.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Quantum Break Bridge scene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your second opinion request

• If the article Black and White has gone to GOCE, then you may update your request for second opinion notification on the GA noticeboard. Cheers. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 15:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Danger Close Games logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Danger Close Games logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Open world category

Hi AdrianGamer, just wanted to let you know that the category is out of wack. I've been having an issue with user TheDeviantPro, because I've been double checking to see if the games in the category have sources, and couldn't find any to support Grand Theft Auto and Fallout 2, so I took them out. He's been adding them back stating that they don't need sources because they are open world games. I don't know if he had anything to do with the page getting all out of wack, but I don't know how to fix it. Since you're one of the senior editors here, I came to you to ask how to fix it. ThanksDohvahkiin (talk) 14:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Skylanders: Imaginators

On 5 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Skylanders: Imaginators, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that selected "imaginators"—characters created through the video game Skylanders: Imaginators—will be printed by 3D printers and turned into real-life toys? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Skylanders: Imaginators. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Skylanders: Imaginators), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Skylanders Imaginators cover art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skylanders Imaginators cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Danger Close Games logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Danger Close Games logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Allen Walker

Hello Andriangamer. I recently nominated the article Allen Walker to FA in Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Allen Walker/archive1. While I got two supports after fixing some issues the commenters provided, it has become quite inactive this past week. I wonder if you could provide feedback before the nomination fails due to lack of commenters. Anyways, good luck editing articles. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 14:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Sega 3D Classics Collection

An article that you have been involved in editing—Sega 3D Classics Collection—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jotamide (talk) 16:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Quantum Break

The article Quantum Break you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Quantum Break for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 18:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sunless Sea page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frontier Developments logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frontier Developments logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Warcraft Film Good Faith Revert

Hello,

I know this is delayed, but I wanted to ask you about my edit that you reverted in July. I'm not really an avid Wiki editor or anything, so please forgive me if I'm going about things the wrong way.

I edited the Warcraft film article to reflect the moviegoer response as well as critical response, and after your revert, I read up on the reasoning why. I think I understand it, but I was hoping you could help answer some questions for me if you have time. It looks like webpages based on primarily UGC are not reliable sources. Is it the entire web page themselves or just the UGC in those webpages? I feel like since the reviews are aggregated by the website, it is a measure of the UGC, and not generated by users. At the very least, I think it's important that despite negativity from the critics, there should be some way to convey that the general population was NOT dissatisfied with the film, no? If we leave only the critical response, it's misleading.

I did realize as well that what I wrote was under a completely incorrect category - public opinion obviously shouldn't be under critical response, but I suppose I wasn't sure if critical meant "professional criticism," or "critiques in general."

Finally, I think another reason why I thought the content and placement was legitimate was because there is an edit in the same section that indicated audience response, and that edit was never removed. It's still there. Why is that edit okay, but mine is not?

Anyhow, I apologize for the long-winded questions, I'm just trying to understand why my edit was reverted, and how I can get these facts across within the rules of Wikipedia. In looking at all the history of edits on this websites, I'm really noticing all the effort folks like you put into making this information source what it is, and I would like to thank you for that.

Looking forward to your response.

@Cnguyen989: - WP:UGC states that editors should not use any user-submitted data, but the sources that provide user-submitted data can be used, but for other purposes. For example, we can use Metacritic for its metascore, but not its user reviews. We mainly avoid using the UGC in these pages but we do not avoid using these sites, unless they are considered as unreliable sources. User reviews/UGC can be used, but only when they are mentioned by reliable secondary sources. For instance, Deadline.com reported that audience gave the film a B+ rating, then this can be used. Thanks for asking and I hope this helps. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

@AdrianGamer: - Thanks for your response and help. Not sure if I'm replying correctly so I just copied the ping prefix. I think everything you said makes sense. So would I be able to cite the Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes ratings through this Forbes article? The article indicates audience scores in its intro.

@Cnguyen989: - That is correct, but there are special cases. Forbes has something called "contributors", whose articles are considered as user-submitted, and unreliable. In this case, this is a UGC citing a UGC. However, if the author is the official staff from Forbes, then the UGC can be cited. AdrianGamer (talk) 10:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

@AdrianGamer: - I see. It makes much more sense now. Thanks very much for you help and explanation, it is very much appreciated.

Spec Ops: The Line

Hey, since you basically brought Spec Ops: The Line up to GA status, just wanted to let you know that I removed the 4th non-free image from the article (the White Phosphorus picture in the reception section). I wasn't sure if the WP picture or the concept art with the sandstorm-ravaged Dubai should be removed. There's a convincing argument for either side (respectively: spoilers, or redundancy compared to the 2nd image - the one showing Walker shooting out a sand window), but I'd like a second opinion on this. I was also considering taking a new WP screenshot that shows the soldiers, but I think you might have had a rationale behind omitting that. (There's another option as well - we could add the sandstorm description to the 2nd image and add the WP picture back.) Liar's Lair (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@Liar's Lair: - Adding the sandstorm description to the 2nd image and adding the WP picture back seem to the best option in my opinion. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:27, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Aight, thanks for the feedback. I'll try to implement that when I have the chance to. Liar's Lair (talk) 04:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spec Ops The Line white phosphorous.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spec Ops The Line white phosphorous.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/ReCore/archive1

Requested ReCore to be peer reviewed after you rated it B-Class, so if you have any suggestions on how to get it to GA... Cognissonance (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

@Cognissonance: - Sure, I will take a look if I have time. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Car lists

Somebody seems to hav e taken a chance and created List of vehicles simulated by iRacing.com This seems to be against every wikipedia policy - how do we go about deleting this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.247.26 (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Black & White (video game)/GA1

AdrianGamer, I would greatly appreciate a response to my question in this review. It shouldn't take you more than a couple of minutes. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Quantum Break

Hello! Your submission of Quantum Break at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Metro: Last Light

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Metro: Last Light you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 14:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Metro: Last Light

The article Metro: Last Light you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Metro: Last Light for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 18:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Metro: Last Light

The article Metro: Last Light you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Metro: Last Light for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 15:41, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Just Cause 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Just Cause 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 19:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Just Cause 2

The article Just Cause 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Just Cause 2 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 21:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Just Cause 2

The article Just Cause 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Just Cause 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 11:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Quantum Break

On 25 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quantum Break, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Quantum Break was described as a "transmedia action-shooter video game and television hybrid"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quantum Break. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Quantum Break), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

The Legend of Zelda (upcoming video game) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Legend of Zelda (upcoming video game). Since you had some involvement with the The Legend of Zelda (upcoming video game) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gestrid (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Metro: Last Light

Hello! Your submission of Metro: Last Light at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Madeline (video game series)

Hi AdrianGamer, you closed a Peer Review on this article because it was, according to you, currently in a GA review. You were mistaken. I had opened up the GAN page, but only to tell reviewers not to start reviewing it because I was ordering a source to add to the article. I kept the article listed in GAN due to the long wait times, which meant that had I done nothing the article would likely not have been reviewed by the time I received my source.

Currently, the article is neither going through a Peer Review or a GAN, and has been through neither throughout the article's existence. I would therefore ask for the Peer Review request to be reinstated.

Thank you, Coin945.--Coin945 (talk) 08:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for my late response. It seems that your source has arrived already, so I don't think I need to reopen the PR. To be honest, instead of leaving the article in the GA queue, the most ideal way is to withdraw your GAN when your article is not truly ready. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shadow of Mordor cover art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shadow of Mordor cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ACE Team logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ACE Team logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help

Hi OceanHok,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AdrianGamer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Metro: Last Light

On 28 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Metro: Last Light, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 4A Games hoped that Metro: Last Light would "rekindle memories of Half-Life 2"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Metro: Last Light. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Metro: Last Light), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Eagle Flight

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Eagle Flight has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Don't forget to archive your citations so that the article doesn't develop "dead" links.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Just Cause 2

On 7 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Just Cause 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the multiplayer fan project developed for Just Cause 2 was recognized by Avalanche Studios as the game's official downloadable content? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Just Cause 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Just Cause 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Just Cause 2

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

2017 in video gaming

Don't remove maintenance templates when the issue raised hasn't been resolved. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for info on when it is and isn't appropriate to remove a maintenance template. — Smjg (talk) 11:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yooka-Laylee cover art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yooka-Laylee cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Outdoor Retreat listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Outdoor Retreat. Since you had some involvement with the Outdoor Retreat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. st170e 19:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FreeStyleGames logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FreeStyleGames logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Main image replacement SGW3

Hi, I saw you set Sniper Ghost Warrior 3 image on wiki - it is now updated. Can I ask you for a replacement - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sniper_Ghost_Warrior_3_cover_art.jpg ? Also, the official name of the game now does not include the ":", if that's possible, could you please remove this from the title. Thank you Justynacigames (talk) 13:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SimCity (2013) logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SimCity (2013) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hunt Horrors of the Gilded Age trailer beta logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hunt Horrors of the Gilded Age trailer beta logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Deep Silver Vienna listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deep Silver Vienna. Since you had some involvement with the Deep Silver Vienna redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10