User talk:ObeseCows

The Ensworth School

G'day. Another editor left a note at WP:WPSCH for one of us to take a look at recent edits to The Ensworth School's article.

Unfortunately, a lot of the content that you were adding to that page was problematic, particularly in regards to neutrality, notability and school article guidelines. I strongly suggest that you familiarise yourself with those policies.

It seems that you might have some inside knowledge regarding the school.. If so, you could do the article a lot of good by providing citations throughout the article for anything that you can.

Separately, be very careful about calling other users vandals, as you did at this diff, because (a) it was untrue; and (b) therefore it was a personal attack. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 22:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Although Danjel has explained this very well, you have chosen to ignore his advice. Please do not continue add unsourced, biased material. You may "know that this is true" but it needs to be verifiable. Continuing to add this type of material will end up in frustration for you as it repeatedly gets removed, and I don't want that to happen because you've spent a lot of time and effort on the article, and I think you've demonstrated writing ability that can Wikipedia better. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 15:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Your recent editing history at The Ensworth School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Hermahgerd (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]