User talk:Hermahgerd

A Little Bit About Me

Welcome to my official Wikipedia page! I am a young buck known as Hermahgerd. I am the chief editor of the page about Montgomery Bell Academy.

As a former student and current teacher at the school, I have primary connections to the school's current happenings and future plans. With this available wealth of inside knowledge, I believe I can educate the Wikipedia community about the interesting history of my school and home. The school is a Tennessee institution and deserves to be known about.

Aside from my knowledge about Montgomery Bell Academy, I also have first-hand knowledge of its neighboring schools, like The Ensworth School and the Harpeth Hall School, even though they are not my fields of absolute expertise.

I hope you enjoy my future edits, as the volatile happenings of these schools will never cease to entertain, enthrall, or plainly educate you. Join me on this magical ride that is Wikipedia!

Get to Know Me

Here is a list of things I thoroughly enjoy: GooGoo Clusters, Peach Nehi, Cricket, Tottenham Hotspur, Everclear and Vodka Cocktails (Usually in a 1:1 ratio, but my tastes change from time to time.), Books, Women, Eating, Rome, and Lipids.

December 2012

Hello, I'm 78.26. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Ensworth School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 04:17, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to The Ensworth School. Thank you. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:14, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Montgomery Bell Academy, you may be blocked from editing. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Montgomery Bell Academy

Much better! Seriously, good job. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hermahgerd, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Hermahgerd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Tom Morris. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Montgomery Bell Academy, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 21:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Ensworth School

G'day, I noticed that you undid my edits. Please note that, per WP:V, citations have to be provided for any information that is challenged (i.e., removed), even if it is factually true. Unfortunately, a lot of the content that you were re-adding to that page was problematic, particularly in regards to neutrality, notability and school article guidelines. I strongly suggest that you familiarise yourself with those policies. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 22:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically:

diff - Whether information is factual or not, it needs to be verified with a citation.
diff - Teachers are not generally notable; if they are, they have to satisfy WP:N, usually by having an article of their own.
diff - Information can be non-neutral in more ways than just through slander, for example, as in this case, the language can be too positive, for example "enjoyed relative success", about which a couple of questions could be asked: "enjoyed relative success" according to whom? "enjoyed relative success" by what measurements? The words are problematic.

I hope this helps. Feel free to talk to me through my talk page, or the talkpage for the article. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 22:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Hermahgerd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

69.247.141.116 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "CornElder92". The reason given for CornElder92's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Reaper Eternal (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Blocked for sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hermahgerd. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hermahgerd. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hermahgerd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just wanted to say that I requested a lift of the IP block because I share the same IP address as the users you have listed in you Sockpuppetry investigation. The conclusion that CornElder92 and I are the same account are true, but the fact that you have convicted RickyBowers66 and ObeseCows is just fallacious in itself. Why could this not be resolved with a simple account block, especially since it is obvious that the behavioral patterns of my accounts and the other two accounts named above are totally contradictory? Upon reading the investigation affidavit, I see that even you all believed that the behavioral patterns of these accounts were different. I can understand the justification for blocking both me and CornElder92, but I do not approve of blocking the helpful users ObeseCows and RickyBowers66, considering an IP block shuts all accounts down. Did the fact that we use the same internet router not cross your minds? I support the blocking of my accounts, but the blocking of the otherwise innocent accounts is, in my opinion, utterly unfair, especially with the many helpful edits that they have made. I urge you to reconsider the blocks of those accounts, but not mine. This is ridiculous.

Decline reason:

As you agree with your block there can be no question of reversing it. The other editors mentioned by you, if they are not you, can speak for themselves. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hermahgerd. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage access revoked due to abuse of talkpage privileges. Yunshui 雲‍水 23:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Montgomery Bell Academy Logo.jpg

The file File:Montgomery Bell Academy Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]