User talk:OberMegaTrans
|
Need Translator
[edit]I'm in need of someone to assist me with a couple of references that are in German, for the Biography article of Michele Weiner-Davis I am working on in my sandbox, that support her mother. I can give you specific questions I have. If you can help me, please leave me a message on my talk page here:Tinkermen Wednesday January 13th
Our award
[edit]I've copied this from my user page, so as not to take all the credit - well done everyone!
Below our star, our helpful Wikipedian has given us some hints on tables and pictures. --AnTransit (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
The Rosetta Barnstar | ||
For you and your team, for your great job in translating Medieval Greek. Thank you guys! Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC) |
- About the images: the ones that were used on de:Mittelgriechische Sprache are all already stored on commons:, so we can actually use them here right away: just copy over the image code, replacing "Bild:" with "File:" and translating the caption as needed. What can get really tricky is the tables – those in the original article have some unnecessary markup ballast, and getting them right for en-wiki requires quite a bit of tweaking. Here's a slightly more efficient way of doing them:
Front | Back | ||
---|---|---|---|
Unrounded | Rounded | Rounded | |
Close | /i/ ι, ει, η | /y/ υ, οι, υι | /u/ ου |
Open-mid | /ɛ/ ε, αι | /ɔ/ ο, ω | |
Open | /a/ α |
Cheers, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Alternav
[edit]Thanks to Esteffect
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Editor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for your contributions KarlssonVomDach (talk) 12:51, 10 December 2011 (UTC) |
Request for translation
[edit]In connection with our article on the May 25 Houla massacre, what in my estimation appears to be an important new source has emerged in the June 23 article "In Syrien gibt es mehr als nur eine Wahrheit" in the Berliner Morgenpost. Given that in the past there has been much controversy over introducing sources which contradict the main narrative of the massacre, i.e. that it was perpetrated by the Syrian government, or groups loyal to it, I believe a high-quality translation of this article is necessary to facilitate a fully informed discussion about its use.
Based on past experience I have requested a translation from you as well as four other translators listed at Wikipedia:Translators available#German-to-English. Therefore, should you decide to take on this task, I would ask that you either give notice to the other four that you are doing the assignment, or to me and I will let the four other know. (I suppose, as a matter of quality assurance, two translations could be presented for comparison, but I don't see that as required at present, but if a second translator would like to duplicate, all the better.) I'm listing the other four below:
- User talk:Pseudopanax#Request for translation
- User talk:Marcika/Archives/1#Request for translation
- User talk:Mstroeck#Request for translation
- User talk:Owen#Request for translation
Your user sandbox could be used as target for the translation (i.e. a permanent link to it would ensure its availability in case it becomes overwritten). __meco (talk) 08:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Marcika has provided a partial translation as presented at Talk:Houla massacre#German articles. This is significant and will be very helpful in the assessment of the Berliner Morgenpost article as a source for our article. However, a full translation would be preferrable, so I will let the request stand in case any of the translators (including Marcika) will see it possible to produce this. __meco (talk) 08:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
Your project is really outstanding! Thank you so much for improving wikipedia.
JimRenge (talk) 17:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
One person, one account
[edit]On your user page (this version) you write "we are a group of people". Please understand that Wikipedia has as strict one person, one account rule. A user account may not represent a group of users. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- @WikiDan61: That description has been on my user page since 23 June 2006 and, until now, no one had understood it to mean that my page is a communal page; you're the first to write to me about it. I have nevertheless changed the wording. That should do the trick, shouldn't it? --OberMegaTrans (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, OberMegaTrans. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Can you help verify translations of articles from German
[edit]Hello OberMegaTrans,
Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from German to English Wikipedia?
This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original German article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:
There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including German , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from German. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.
If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:
All you have to do, is compare the English article to the German article, and assess them "Pass" or "Fail" (the {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} templates may be useful here). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then assessing it, that's even better, but it isn't required.) Also please note that we are assessing accuracy not completeness, so if the English article is much shorter that is okay, as long as whatever has been translated so far is factually accurate.
If you can help, please {{ping}} me here to let me know. You can add your pass/fails above, right next to each link, or you may indicate your results below. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 06:44, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
@Mathglot: We will be taking a look at it soon. We'll get back to you with an evaluation as soon as possible. OberMegaTrans (talk) 15:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! Someone else is looking at Hamburg MoW now, so I've added a new one instead at #3. Thanks again, and ping me with any questions or comments. Mathglot (talk) 05:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Mathglot: We're done. They both pass. Thanks for asking! — Preceding unsigned comment added by OberMegaTrans (talk • contribs) 12:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 03:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
German Translation Verification Request
[edit]Hi,
I found your name in Wikipedia:Translators_available#German-to-English. I recently translated User:Degeno/Canton of Mutterstadt, using Google translate (carefully sentence by sentence, sometime clause by clause, cleaning up and resolving issues as best I could), and I'd appreciate it if you could double-check it to the point where I might be able to remove the "rough translation" banner. I lined up the original German sentences with my translations using Template:Clarify, which I hope will make that easier, but the text still follows de:Kanton Mutterstadt closely if that's better.
Thanks! - Degeno (talk) 15:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, OberMegaTrans. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please import version history
[edit]Dear OberMegaTrans, please be aware that copying articles from de.wp for translation, like Sally'sWorld did with the article mainly written by Andreas Schwarzkopf at User:Sally'sWorld/Pflastermosaike in Freiburg violates the CC-BY-SA license since the creators of the translated article are not mentioned. In order to fix this, please always file Requests for page importation (which can also be done afterwards, but should really not be forgotten!). For details, please refer to de:Wikipedia:Übersetzungen#Lizenzfragen: Urheberrecht und Originaltext. Thanks for spreading "the other side of Wikipedia" at your university. Best regards and happy holidays, --Flominator (talk) 18:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Flominator: Thanks for the clarification. We'll be talking about how to take care of that later today! OberMegaTrans (talk) 10:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Any results? --Flominator (talk) 10:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, OberMegaTrans. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Real Life Barnstar | |
from real-life Raum C to you TranslateAllTheThings (talk) 21:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC) |
CookieJarStupidity
[edit]Hello. Could you please confirm that user:CookieJarStupidity is one of your alternative accounts. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 14:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hello CLCStudent. user:CookieJarStupidity is one of our members. They will be working with us this semester. Could you please reinstate their Userpage. If you have any questions about our project, please let me know. OberMegaTrans (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- I did not deleted her userpage. Userpages always start off blank until the user posts content there. Anyway, thank you for the confirmation. CLCStudent (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Well, "confirmation" is not exactly the correct word. user:CookieJarStupidity is not "one of my alternative accounts" but rather one participant (of many) in our project. Thanks for your interst. 15:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Rolf Tschierschky moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Rolf Tschierschky, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Draft:Rolf Tschierschky concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rolf Tschierschky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rolf Tschierschky
[edit]Hello, OberMegaTrans. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rolf Tschierschky".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Attributing translations
[edit]Hi, I noticed one of you(r students?) translated an article from German Wikipedia without attributing the translation (this is vital) and without porting over the references (this suggests none of them have been checked, which is alarming). Can you please have everyone involved review Help:Translation, particularly "License requirements"? Thank you!
Regarding references, you may want to prioritize translating articles with a good set of accessible footnotes (ie, ones you can easily verify yourself - online, books held by your library, etc). For two reasons: one, so you aren't accidentally spreading misinformation, and two, so your content isn't removed. German Wikipedia has very different standards from en-wiki with regards to footnotes and tolerates unfootnoted paragraphs provided there is a "Literatur" section to which the info can plausibly be attributed; on en-wiki an apparently unsourced paragraph is very likely to be deleted. -- asilvering (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reminder. We were just talking about attribution as a matter of fact. I will remind everyone once again.
- As to references, we work on this as much as we can but it seems to be a perennial boogerbear. We are very familiar with the risk of deletion! But we shall do our best to keep calm, carry on and improve. OberMegaTrans (talk) 16:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
New message from Vanjagenije
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Booba taco § unblocking. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Vanjagenije,
- Yes, I saw that and have now responded:
- "It is indeed legitimate. Our new term and class has just started and one of the first things I ask students to do is to register on Wikipedia and then to put something on their Userpage as a means of introduction. As we continue our work, it will become abundantly clear that they are working sensibly, collaboratively and hopefully helpfully on Wikipedia. I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding.
- On a side-note, things like this, and worse, happen routinely to my students on Wikipedia but in the 17 odd years I've been doing this, I cannot see any particular or clear pattern. Looking back, it actually seems very random and rather arbitrary. It often seems to be one particular Wikipedian who, for whatever reason, has a problem with one of my students (or their work). In over 90% of the cases, we're usually able to clear things up rather quickly. I've decided to use these events as "teaching moments" so I suppose a round of thanks is also in order. :-) OberMegaTrans (talk) 15:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)" OberMegaTrans (talk) 15:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)