User talk:Nutellab

Welcome!

Hi Nutellab! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Gleeanon409 (talk) 20:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nutellab! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Book Contributor Citation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Nutellab. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Pi (Talk to me!) 21:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Draft:Amei Wallach

Hello! I took out the use of Prabook as a source, as we don't use any sources that are themselves user-generated or wiki style. Thanks.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! @ThatMontrealIP

Although you have formatted the notification to ThatMontrealIP properly, unless you sign your note with four tildes ~, the system will not know to send the notification. Your "signature" is needed.Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 05:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More notes...

Hello, Nutellab, also, please observe that someone removed the info regarding her home area & spouse's name. Even if you have a rock-solid ref for this, I urge you to consider the privacy issues, esp. for a woman. Her accomplishments are enough, we don't need to tell the world where she lives, etc. I am adding some sources I found, and suggest you read them to see if they can be added elsewhere in the article. Hope this helps. Best wishes (from a female tiger, heh, heh!), Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 02:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tribe of Tiger: I took out the bits about where she lives and her spouse, as they were not sourced,. As you say, they are also not really information that people need to know for those who are not terrifically famous. I believe this is also covered in WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE, where it says Many Wikipedia articles contain material on people who are not well known, even if they are notable enough for their own article. In such cases, exercise restraint and include only material relevant to the person's notability, focusing on high-quality secondary sources. See also Wikipedia:LOWPROFILE.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ThatMontrealIP: thank you for noting these particular links. I will copy them for future reference! My best "memory" is of the overall integrity of the responsible and honorable rules outlined in WP:BLP, and the protection they seek to provide for article subjects. They were a primary and positive factor in my decision to become an editor. Thanks so much for making the right decision, while I was distracted, looking for more sources. Sincere regards and respect, Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 05:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tribe of Tiger: Thank you for that reminder about protecting women's privacy! I didn't consider those ramifications, and appreciate the advice (from one female to another). Thanks for looking out for the community! Nutellab (talk) 14:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ThatMontrealIP: Thank you for providing those relevant links! I will definitely use them in the future now that I know the specifics that necessitate personal details.Nutellab (talk) 14:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would rename Personal life to Education, and aim to expand it to Early life and education. Gleeanon409 (talk) 04:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gleeanon409: That makes sense, thanks for help w/ reformatting!Nutellab (talk) 14:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amei Wallach (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft however more evidence is needed of how she meets the criteria for notability. Have the films she's worked on won any awards for example?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amei Wallach and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amei Wallach, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 09:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nutellab! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 09:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nutellab! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need another pair of eyes for Biography Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amei Wallach has been accepted

Amei Wallach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Photograph logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Photograph logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Photograph logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Photograph logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Photograph magazine (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Photograph magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Photograph magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Nutellab. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page John Michael Kohler Arts Center, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 19:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ruth DeYoung Kohler ll

Hello, Nutellab. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruth DeYoung Kohler ll, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth DeYoung Kohler ll (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. More citations are needed to support the statements made e.g. the first paragraph of the early life section, and the awards in the list.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruth DeYoung Kohler ll and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruth DeYoung Kohler ll, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Photograph magazine

Hello, Nutellab. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Photograph magazine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]