Jump to content

User talk:Numberguy6/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Oregon House of Representatives election has been accepted

2022 Oregon House of Representatives election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Childhood in Iceland

A tag has been placed on Category:Childhood in Iceland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Florida Senate election has been accepted

2022 Florida Senate election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:May 2022 events in Japan

A tag has been placed on Category:May 2022 events in Japan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Equatorial Guinea templates

A tag has been placed on Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Equatorial Guinea templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your edits to Expand language templates are incorrectly removing the page name in the other language

Saw a couple of these pop up on my watchlist (this and this). Note that after your edits, the text of Template:Expand reads A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Chinese Wikipedia article at [[:zh:]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated page}} to the talk page., where the intended output is more along the lines of A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Chinese Wikipedia article at [[:zh:周悼王]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|zh|周悼王}} to the talk page.

I see you've made quite a number of this kind of edit, which makes it unclear how any editors performing the suggested translation are supposed to include the required attribution.

Can you kindly go back over your recent edits to this template so as to restore the deleted page name, while retaining the topics you added? Folly Mox (talk) 08:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

I just made an edit request at Template:Expand language that would automatically fix this problem. --Numberguy6 (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Greenlandic feminine given names

A tag has been placed on Category:Greenlandic feminine given names indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Help on an article

Hello, good morning dear editor, I invite you to help me repair and reformulate that article click here, could you help? greetings and good contributions :) --Ryenaldo Ziur (talk) 03:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Greenlandic given names

A tag has been placed on Category:Greenlandic given names indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:36, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Florida has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Florida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 22:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Arizona has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Arizona, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 01:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Colorado has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Colorado, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 00:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Nevada has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Nevada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 10:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Texas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Texas. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 10:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Hawaii has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Hawaii. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 10:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Request on 11:41:42, 23 March 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by DCLawwyer

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Dear Numberguy6

You declined https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Theo_Alc%C3%A1ntara Your reason was "Written like a résumé/CV." You referred me to 'What Wikipedia is not'

1. There is no "What Wikipedia is not" that supports "résumé/CV" as a ground for refusal. Are you enforcing a Wikirule or a personal preference? (I deal a lot with a federal agency where a lot of decisions are made on personal preference, rather than the law, and my whole career is about pulling those decisions back and getting them re-made on proper legal grounds -- I'm pretty sensitive to that.)

2. The closest item in What Wikipedia is not is "Wikipedia is not a means of promotion." Promotion is about the future. Biography is about the past. "Promotion" is "If you need a conductor in the future, then call Theo out of retirement." The article is just historical facts. Historical facts are not "promotion." Or rather, any definition of the word "promotion" that embraces a catalog of the notable historical accomplishments of a person is not a useful definition of "promotion" and conflicts with the requirement of "notability."

3. Whatever standard you're applying, are you applying it in a rational, context-sensitive way? Mr Alcántara is an orchestra/opera conductor. For most conductors, life is a series of one-night gigs, hoping to get lucky and land one of the few permanent appointments with a single orchestra. A 35-year career of permanent appointments is a real rarity! It's that series of appointments and one-night gigs that any reader of this article cares about. It's the orchestras/operas he's been invited to conduct and record that makes him notable.

4. This is standard biographical dictionary entry for a musician. Back in the days of print, Nicolas Slonimsky's Baker's_Biographical_Dictionary_of_Musicians was a standard work. Its entry for Mr Alcántara is here [1] If that's the standard biographical entry form for the standard biographical compilation, why would it be inappropriate for Wikipedia?

5. A blanket rejection is not a helpful response on your part. How does it get fixed? No one reacts well to "no" but anyone will be grateful for "Here's a suggestion for what you do next." (And I suspect that if you thought about what to do next, you'd convince yourself that there is no notable "next step" except to accept the article.)

Thank you

DCLawwyer (talk) 11:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Washington (state) (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SounderBruce was:
A mere collection of statistics without sufficient context. The content could easily be merged into the national article until there is a specific need to fork.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SounderBruce 21:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Massachusetts has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Massachusetts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 11:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Vermont has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Vermont, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 11:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Oregon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Oregon. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Article about Neuschwanstein (band) now improved?

Hello Numberguy6, my submission of Neuschwanstein (band) was rejected by you. I tried to shorten the original article and keep only the most important elements concerning the band. Instead of putting the pictures in the text, I have now included a gallery. Please look at here. I hope that the article will now be accepted. Best regards --Remembergeorge (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Georgia (U.S. state) (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcguy15 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Plug-in_electric_vehicles_in_the_United_States#Georgia instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There is a whole lot of information on the topic already at Plug-in_electric_vehicles_in_the_United_States#Georgia. I would suggest for you to either merge information from this draft there, or, use the information in Plug-in electric vehicles in the United States to base a new article from.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 18:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Georgia has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Georgia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 19:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your recent spate of GA nominations

Numberguy6, we appreciate your interest in nominating articles to be GAs. However, if you wish to nominate articles that you have not made significant contributions to, the GA nomination instructions say you need to consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination, something you have not done. There is something of a consultation going on with your nomination of Iceland, though it would be worthwhile to broaden the discussion to see whether the regular editors feel there are other areas of the article beyond the templates you dealt with that need work to meet the GA criteria.

You will note that all of your overnight nominations were reverted; in this case, the editor who did so said they were far from ready. Indeed, looking at Hekla, I can see that large sections of the article are completely unsourced, which is basic: the nomination would be quickfailed for verifiability issues. Note that doing so would take a volunteer reviewer's time, and means that another article that is better prepared has to wait that much longer to be reviewed.

Before you do any further nominations, I'd like to suggest that you better familiarize yourself with GA criteria and how they apply so you can better assess the condition of articles you're interested in nominating, and go through the Iceland review so you know what's involved as a nominator addressing issues raised in the course of a review. (Nominating is a commitment to make the necessary improvements raised by a reviewer as part of the GA review.) Best of luck. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: @2001:4455:30B:6C00:195B:B2A6:FCD5:EEDF: I specifically checked all of the articles to make sure they didn't have any maintenance tags. If the articles need maintenance tags, can you or someone else go and add them? Numberguy6 (talk) 16:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Numberguy6, it's not about maintenance tags. A great many articles on Wikipedia do not meet the GA criteria or even come close, not just those with maintenance tags, but no one has gone through them all to see what maintenance tags are needed, or what sections need better (or any) sourcing, or ought to be expanded, or whatever. Sometimes there isn't any maintenance to be done, but a significant expansion is needed in order to meet the "Broad in its coverage" criterion. If you're truly interested in nominating those articles and shepherding them through the GA process, you need to do those talk-page consultations first. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Decline of AfC Article Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft

Dear Numgerguy6, I just saw that you declined Draft:Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft which was resubmitted to the AfC. Unfortunately, I do not see an explanation why this was done? To my understanding, all issues that were raised during the last decline have been addressed. Your feedback would be much appreciated. --DBIAW (talk) 08:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1834 in Michigan

A tag has been placed on Category:1834 in Michigan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Ankthay ouyay!

Eyhay, anksthay orfay acceptingyay ymay aftdray orfay Owbeefslay! Iyay asway initiallyyay ayay itbay aredscay ehay ouldn'tway asspay wp:gng andyay ouldway ebay onsideredcay ayay person otablenay orfay oneyay event, osay iyay iedtray otay itewray ustjay asyay uchmay asyay iyay ouldcay onyay ywhay ishay ontributionscay otay et'slay ayingplay isyay ignificantsay.

Also, atyay 12:00 amyay astlay ightnay anyay aprilyay oolsfay eteormay ashedcray intoyay ymay ousehay, emittingyay ayay adioactiveray aurayay atthay ausedcay emay otay orgetfay owhay otay etypay inyay englishyay. Uckilylay iyay orkedway onyay ethay articleyay astlay ightnay andyay ooktay otesnay orfay ityay eforebay endingsay ityay otay aftspacedray, osay I'myay oodgay! 🐷 PantheonRadiance (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Illinois (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 20:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Apurba Kumar Bardalai

Draft:Apurba_Kumar_Bardalai has been reviewed by you. You have not accepted it for submission, as some sections were not adequately supported by reliable sources. I have now removed those sections - Early Life and certain portions of the Career Section. Being an Armed Forces Officer (Retired), you will agree that certain aspects of his Service Career may not have references, as is the case with all such Subjects. Please may I request you to review by article now and also provide me some advice on how to improve it. Thank you!

Jonathanvarunbenjamin (talk) 08:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Request on 00:23:32, 6 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by KennyGOf Aus


Dear Numberguy6, Thanks for your review but I need guidance about whether the page will ever be published regardless of any changes I make. I ask because AppO sits at the junction of a number of corporate/government processes and systems, and we believe it to be the only tool thus far that effectively ties them together in a pragmatic approach. In other words, in these matters, we are breaking new ground. To explain how I prepared the article, I found an article on Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision-making_software I thought this page was out of date so I wanted to include AppO, which meant I needed to edit it but I noted that the other software listed had links to other Wikipedia articles about that software, which caused me to create the article in question so that I had something to link to. The first software mentioned on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision-making_software page is 1000Minds with a link to an article on their product at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000minds This was the article I styled mine from. I actually think this is a very good product in its market niche, but NOT in business transformation where AppO sits. I could basically duplicate that page (with links to 89 articles, very many of them insignificant and not referring to directly applicable substantial research in the University of NSW that does not support their product/argument) but change the name then add the bits that make our software different but again, We have moved on from that offering, which was developed 20 years ago, and consider ours to be more advanced with a very different approach. We believe AppO to be the first product that strongly supports Strategy Development (no article on Wikipedia) and aligns it with Strategy Delivery, otherwise known as Project Portfolio Management (Part of an article on Strategic Management on Wikipedia) and then bridges those to operations (Operations Management is an article on Wikipedia). BTW, the misalignment of strategy development and strategy delivery costs business and government around $2.3 Trillion per annum (roughly the GDP of Brazil). We are the first to link strategic drivers at the top level all the way down the value measure hierarchy to production statistics, including planned program benefits (known as Benefits Realisation Management on Wikipedia). These value measures include all of KRAs, KPIs, CSFs and Balanced Scorecard (all have articles on Wikipedia). We are the first to attempt automatic inference of likely consensus among stakeholders with differing views of what exactly constitutes business value and also the first to attempt to identify, in detail, where stakeholders will need to compromise to come to agreement on their portfolio of business transformation (there is an article on Business Transformation on Wikipedia but I would suggest that it is not only externally driven since Strategy Management is an internal process albeit it does consider external drivers). We are not the first (second actually and developed entirely in isolation) to be able to consider the views of external stakeholders (customers, investors, third-party experts etc.) on what is of value and enables the organisation to understand where changes might have to be made to ensure success of any and all transformation initiatives. We are definitely the first to focus on providing corporate and government a pragmatic tool to enable consideration of matters like the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (Articles on Wikipedia) or The World Business Council for Sustainable Development's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Protocol in evaluating a project portfolio. This means we are the first to be able to ensure "Greenwashing" does not occur. Since nearly all developed countries ascribe a fiduciary duty to Directors to protect shareholder value and there is now a proven inextricable link between accurate sustainability reporting and share price we are the first to be able to protect the directors in their decision-making. The other benefits to an organisation arising from our software in this regard include boosted customer and employee engagement, attraction and retention of talent, improved social licence, reduced operational risk and, increasingly, enhanced investment return. We are the first decision-making software to provide a likely 100% fit to corporate and government governance and gating processes (there is an article on Wikipedia called Corporate Governance but it does not describe the context of governing transformation activities, we need to look at the article on I.T. Governance for that so a more general article is needed) thereby significantly strengthening and supporting the business cases arising from it (article on Wikipedia on Business Cases covers the context but not the governance and gating processes and erroneously talks about considering only cost and benefit in $ terms). In my view things have moved on quite a long way from where it seems nearly all of the current articles are that touch these subjects on Wikipedia. Thus I am asking, if we are the first to develop such an encompassing solution, with a number of unique inventions (Revolutionary vs Evolutionary) and we do not want to disclose any of our I.P how can I include references to material located outside Wikipedia without referring to our own material and how can I write an article styled on another that does not sound like an ad to people who are not specialists in Business Transformation please? I am not trying to be difficult, I am honestly asking because you may not have noted that I tried very hard to avoid any opinions, just offering fact. Also, my apologies, I have my head stuck in detail and I can be a bit of a pedant at times like these AND I have absolutely no background in writing articles for an encyclopedia. I also have no real skills at sales or marketing so that may be why I have accidentally created an ad. BTW The article on Decision Making Software does not include Transparent Choice from the UK (very capable, aimed at Project Management Offices) OR Perfect Choice from the U.S. (also very capable, aimed at general decision-making and part owned by Thomas Saaty the mathematician that developed the Analytic Hierarchy process, one of only two that are considered appropriate to develop project portfolios). Collectively, in my view, Transparent Choice, Perfect Choice, 1000Minds and AppO are the only viable alternatives for commercial, highly complex decision-making. The others mentioned on that page, by and large, are academic solutions arising directly from Decision Science at various universities and almost all have a narrow solution focus. In this context 1000Minds is the only competitive and truly capable decision-making software listed on the page. In my view this article needs a really thorough review but probably not by any of the stakeholders in Transparent Choice, Perfect Choice, 1000Minds OR AppO. Please, can you help me in any way? Cheers Ken

KennyGOf Aus (talk) 00:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

@KennyGOf Aus: The fact that you work for the company makes your submission of this article a WP:COI. So no, I don't think the draft could be improved enough (by you) to be submitted. Numberguy6 (talk) 01:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you again,
Am I at liberty of asking someone not associated with the company to work on the article please?
Cheers
Ken KennyGOf Aus (talk) 01:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Yes, you can do that. Numberguy6 (talk) 01:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Think Yoruba First

Pls can you help me with this draft by modifying it into an encyclopedia format. And help me with the moving of it into article. Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Yoruba nation

You are free to edit this page but Yoruba nations is a member of unrepresented nations people organization UNPO you can do your research for more on it. You can ask any questions if it's not cleared enough Fieldmarshalgoldenboy (talk) 18:36, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Yamatai Honshu Theory

What was your reason for rejecting Draft:Yamatai Honshu Theory? How can it be improved to get into mainspace?MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 16:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

@MaitreyaVaruna: There are many [citation needed] tags throughout the article.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nightwatch (TV series) (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Several reviews in national newspapers are generally the best sources to show notability for a TV show.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Request on 14:57:36, 9 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by 98.186.54.177


I Need a Redirect for this article can you help me please redirect this article. 98.186.54.177 (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

98.186.54.177 (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Illinois has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Illinois, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 22:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Maryland (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A quick literature and scientific journal search indicates that the topic "Plug-in electric vehicles in Maryland" has not yet been subject to scientific research or a broad public discussion. Therefore, I'm declining this draft. A simple though experiment reveals the major flaw with the idea behind this draft: This article would work with any place, id est we could substitute Maryland with whatever place we like and still find plenty of information online. We could even choose to exclude all vehicles with ICEs. Also see WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nightwatch (TV series) (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Declining per discussion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Bilorv (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Request on 07:23:09, 12 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by 188.220.113.92


Hi, many thanks for reviewing my article, you've said it rereads more like an advertisement, do you have any advise on how to improve this please? do I need to find more independent references? Thanks

188.220.113.92 (talk) 07:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Minnesota has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Minnesota, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 12:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Washington (state) has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Washington (state), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 12:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nightwatch (TV series) has been accepted

Nightwatch (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 01:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Utah has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Utah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 09:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Maine has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Maine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 09:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Request on 15:32:35, 19 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Quinnbe


Hey, my entry for the G2 Ops page was recently rejected for reading more like an advertisement than a neutral article. I understand it was very positive, but I took almost all the information about the company available on the internet from neutral and reliable sources. I am not sure how I can make it sound less like an advertisement. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. I believe their multi-million dollar status and recognition in the defense industry should make them notable enough for a short page.

Quinnbe (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Request on 16:56:06, 21 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Melissaad



Melissaad (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Numberguy6, I am inquiring about how to make our submission acceptable for AmeriSave Mortgage Corporation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:AmeriSave_Mortgage_Corporation).

It has been recently rejected by you (and previously) for sounding too advertising-like and not containing reliable sources. The last submission was drastically cut down and edited from a prior version and all sources cited are third-party links so we felt we had addressed the issues originally presented.

Can you please provide some specific guidance or examples in our submission on how to remedy this so that it is acceptable? We've been trying to get this published since last year.

Thank in advance for any specific insights you can provide.

Melissaad (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC) melissaad

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Alaska has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Alaska, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 08:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Michigan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Michigan. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 12:58, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Quebec (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
It's profoundly unclear why we would need separate standalone "plug-in electric vehicles in [individual province]" for each province and territory in Canada, if the entire content is just "percentage of new vehicle registrations + tax rebate status + number of electric charging stations" -- that's not so much an article as it is a directory entry.
It would be much better to start with one article about electric vehicles in Canada, which can easily delve into provincial details as subsections, and then consider spinning off subpages for individual provinces if and when that article actually becomes long enough to warrant splitouts -- but we don't need to start with separate articles for each province right off the bat, if they're going to be this short and unsubstantive.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Ontario (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
It's profoundly unclear why we would need separate standalone "plug-in electric vehicles in [individual province]" for each province and territory in Canada, if the entire content is just "percentage of new vehicle registrations + tax rebate status + number of electric charging stations" -- that's not so much an article as it is a directory entry.
It would be much better to start with one article about electric vehicles in Canada, which can easily delve into provincial details as subsections, and then consider spinning off subpages for individual provinces if and when that article actually becomes long enough to warrant splitouts -- but we don't need to start with separate articles for each province right off the bat, if they're going to be this short and unsubstantive.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 15:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in British Columbia (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
It's profoundly unclear why we would need separate standalone "plug-in electric vehicles in [individual province]" for each province and territory in Canada, if the entire content is just "percentage of new vehicle registrations + tax rebate status + number of electric charging stations" -- that's not so much an article as it is a directory entry.
It would be much better to start with one article about electric vehicles in Canada, which can easily delve into provincial details as subsections, and then consider spinning off subpages for individual provinces if and when that article actually becomes long enough to warrant splitouts -- but we don't need to start with separate articles for each province right off the bat, if they're going to be this short and unsubstantive.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 15:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Xu Zidong

Hi!

Thanks for taking the time to reviewing my article. The sourcing has now been much improved. If I can trouble you for taking another look.

All the best 

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrinkzxo (talk • contribs) 19:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Michigan (April 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Imzadi1979 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Do we really need one article of this sort on every state in the union? Can't we start with a national article and see what needs to be split out per WP:SIZE concerns in line with our preference for WP:SS?
Imzadi 1979 → 05:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Indiana (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Page needs to be extended before it is approved.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 12:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1997 establishments in Namibia

A tag has been placed on Category:1997 establishments in Namibia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Help with the Zvi Safra draft

Hello, I have submitted the article of Zvi Safra and it was declined on March 23rd. After reading all the articles regarding citing and referencing I remained unsure what can I do to improve my chances of getting this article approved. If you could please help me with some assistance I would be grateful. Thank you, Oak9500. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oak9500 (talk • contribs) 09:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Request on 21:10:21, 7 May 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by ItsTimeForChange


Hi, I am requesting some guidance on what else may be needed to make my submission (Abraham K. Goldhagen) acceptable to the reviewer(s). I did make some edits based on the prior comments- maybe these are sufficient for publication? Much appreciated and look forward to your feedback. ItsTimeForChange

ItsTimeForChange (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Quebec has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Quebec, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Ontario (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2010 in Hungary

Notice

The article 2010 in Hungary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDIRECTORY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 06:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in North Carolina has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in North Carolina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 09:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Maryland has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Maryland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 10:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in New Jersey has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in New Jersey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 20:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plug-in electric vehicles in Ohio has been accepted

Plug-in electric vehicles in Ohio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 08:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Numberguy6/Archive_4&oldid=1118479078"