User talk:Notepanel

Speedy deletion of A2Z Travel

A tag has been placed on A2Z Travel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Table on A2Z Travel page

I noticed that you tried to add to the fleet list on A2Z Travel but left the table looking rather a mess. If you can't figure out how to get the table formatting correct I would suggest that you revert the page to before your changes, so it doesn't look a mess, and then put a note on the article's talk page with the information you want to add, or to ask for advice. It's likely that someone else will then be able to help you. This is much better than leaving the page looking a mess. Thanks, Rich257 (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of A2Z Travel

A tag has been placed on A2Z Travel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of West Midlands Bus Route 302

I have nominated West Midlands Bus Route 302, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands Bus Route 302. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Reedswood Retail Park

A tag has been placed on Reedswood Retail Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 21:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quaser Centre

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Quaser Centre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Quaser Centre. Roleplayer (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of National Express West Midlands Service 394

A tag has been placed on National Express West Midlands Service 394 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 14:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bus route articles

Be careful when creating articles on West Midlands bus routes. They are rarely notable enough to be included on Wikipedia per WP:NOT (Wikipedia is not a directory). Local services should be emitted, but if they cover a large area of the county, then it might be worth including them. It is very touch and go. Thanks. - Erebus555 (talk) 17:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Express West Midlands routes 704, 705 and 705A

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article National Express West Midlands routes 704, 705 and 705A, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Thanks - Dudleybus ^{Spake 2 me} 13:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands Buses

There is a template to standardize the articels of West Midlands buses on the category they go in if you would not mind using it. Thanks - Dudleybus ^{Spake 2 me} 08:20, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Route Changes on List of bus routes in the West Midlands county

Hello Notepanel,

I work at Traveline West Midlands/ Centro Hotline and every week we receive registrations from all the bus companies detailing what changes they are going to do to the route. As we are classed as 'front-line staff' we are allowed to give out the information as it is released to us. You can view the registrations as they come in via VOSA, however, they do not usually give information if it is just a 'route variation' or 'timetable alteration'.

Hope this helps!

T. Thanhuk (talk) 21:05, 13 July 2008 (GMT)

Just to let you know that i know for a fact that HANSONS route 250 is NOT getting widthdrawn

Me^{Myself and I}with the UK Transport Wiki 19: 54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

National Express West Midlands Scania Omnilink

I think you are right where you have suggested about West Bromwich garage being allocated some of the 60x Scania Omnilinks arriving later this year. The following is what I assume is happening ...

Walsall routes 301 311 and 313 = about 25 buses
West Bromwich routes 404 and 404A = about 15 buses
Coventry routes 20, 30A, 30C, 40, 50 and 60 = about 15 buses
Pensnett unknown route(s) = about 5 buses

this still could dramatically change though. Curran1980 (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: A2Z Travel

Sorry I've been so late in replying about this! If I'm honest I got sidetracked when I first read the message then completely forgot! So once again, apologies about that.

I have looked at the current situation. As you say, the section is referenced and I definitely think it's notable, after all, what's a bus company without its licence?! I think that in due course it may be an idea if you or someone else could find a couple more references to that section (indeed a few more for the whole article), to strengthen it a bit.

However, as it stands, there is no reason for the information to be deleted. The fact that two IP addresses have removed the content makes me suspicious, I really honestly wouldn't be surprised if those IPs come from people who work for or are related to the company, and are trying to not make themselves look bad.

I now have the page on my watchlist and will continue to look out for further vandalism. As I said, there is no reason why is should be deleted. Thanks for asking me about a second opinion, it's always good to have a couple of editors behind you!! Arriva436^{talk/contribs} 19:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Choice Travel

Please don't be offended that I am about to remove the Service Provision section from the routes table that you have just created on this page, this will bring it in line with the information on UK Bus Operator Quality Drive jenuk1985 (talk) 16:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: S802 & S803

S802 is a normal service variant of S2 (one morning trip Balsall Common > Olton) which takes a direct route between Knowle & Solihull, as it runs on Saturdays as well as weekdays, including School Holidays.
S803 is a short working variant of S3 (Acocks Green > Solihull) which runs on schooldays mornings only so is probably a "School Service available to general public". Curran1980 (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UK Bus Routes

I have created a quality drive similar to the operator drive, based on some of the points I have previously raised regarding bus routes in the UK. Your input and participation would be greatly welcomed! Find the page at WP:UKBRQDRIVE. Thanks! jenuk1985 (talk) 03:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also a quick note to say, that while it appears that I have a vendetta against bus route articles, I don't. Personally I'd love to see articles for all my local routes in Bromsgrove, its just not in the remit of Wikipedia. I'm just trying to achieve a level of consistency. jenuk1985 (talk) 03:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Express West Midlands route 326

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article National Express West Midlands route 326, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable bus article. If you believe this article should be saved, delete this notice as per instructions, but also please add to discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject buses/UK bus route quality drive, extra input will be very helpful!

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.. I have also tagged the following articles:

jenuk1985 (talk) 16:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

Where possible, could you try to reference your additions to bus route pages? Most are already unreferenced, and referencing new material would go a long way! You can use N&Ps as references, as I have done at Bus transport in Bromsgrove. Thanks! Jenuk1985 | Talk 18:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References, again

West Midlands bus routes 56, 56A & X56

Presumably you are getting this information from somewhere when you create articles such as this one. Please cite your sources of information in the articles as you create them. Uncle G (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an Arbcom restriction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands Bus Routes on OpenStreetMap

Us folks over at OpenStreetMap (OSM) are currently adding bus routes to the map. It would be helpful to have a dialogue so that we at OSM can better tag the routes with the correct information. One problem we have is knowing the correct history of takeovers so that our routes are tagged with the correct bus operator and operator code. See www.mappa-mercia.org and select the public transport map. You can reach us at: team at mappa-mercia.org Cheers Blackadderajr (talk) 11:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JP Travel and general notability of smaller bus operators

Hello, there is a discussion at Talk:JP Travel which you may be interested in regarding notability of smaller bus operators. (This is a copy and paste message, I have included you in this as you make bus related contributions) Jeni ^(talk) 18:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

White Livery

Hi there, I was wondering how you found out about buses being painted into all white livery? Is this because stagecoach's livery is basically white, and also, what buses if any have been painted into such livery?

(Umbongo91 (talk) 22:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus routes 51, X51 and 951A

The article West Midlands bus routes 51, X51 and 951A has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable bus routes

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aiken ♫ 20:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus routes 56, 56A & X56

The article West Midlands bus routes 56, 56A & X56 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable bus routes

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aiken ♫ 20:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus route 366

The article West Midlands bus route 366 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable bus route

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aiken ♫ 20:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus route 377

The article West Midlands bus route 377 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable bus route

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aiken ♫ 20:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of West Midlands bus routes 51, X51 and 951A

I have nominated West Midlands bus routes 51, X51 and 951A, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands bus routes 51, X51 and 951A. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I am really sorry to see so much of your hard work deleted. there is a group of editors, who you can join, who can help reference notable articles which are up for deletion:

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Hello, Notepanel. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Okip 23:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Express West Midlands Fleet

The article National Express West Midlands Fleet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory or a website for a hobby. This lacks any significant coverage in reliable sources and falls well short of WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nuttah (talk) 17:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus routes 1, 2 & 5

The article West Midlands bus routes 1, 2 & 5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bus route that lacks any significant coverage in independent reliable sources, falls short of WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nuttah (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands Walsall Road bus Corridor

The article West Midlands Walsall Road bus Corridor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bus route that lacks any significant coverage in independent reliable sources, falls short of WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nuttah (talk) 17:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of National Express West Midlands Fleet

I have nominated National Express West Midlands Fleet, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Express West Midlands Fleet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nuttah (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus routes 1, 2 & 5

The article West Midlands bus routes 1, 2 & 5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another bus route article that offers nothing as to how WP:GNG is met.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nuttah (talk) 11:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of West Midlands bus routes 1, 2 & 5 for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article West Midlands bus routes 1, 2 & 5, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands bus routes 1, 2 & 5 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nuttah (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Express West Midlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Express Coaches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Megabus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of West Midlands bus routes 340, 341 and 342 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Midlands bus routes 340, 341 and 342 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands bus routes 340, 341 and 342 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. aycliffe^talk 07:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus route 991

The article West Midlands bus route 991 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Buscruft, cited only to timetables, no evidence of independent reliable secondary coverage about Route 991. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 10:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of West Midlands bus route 991 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Midlands bus route 991 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands bus route 991 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus routes 69, 70 and 70A

The article West Midlands bus routes 69, 70 and 70A has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 23:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of West Midlands bus routes 401E and 405 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Midlands bus routes 401E and 405 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands bus routes 401E and 405 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Charles (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus routes 334 and 339

The article West Midlands bus routes 334 and 339 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2009. No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 19:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Midlands bus route 529

The article West Midlands bus route 529 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources since 2009. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ChaseLinx for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ChaseLinx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChaseLinx until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SK2242 (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A2Z Travel

The article A2Z Travel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CORP. All of the sources are routine trivial coverage (see WP:CORPDEPTH) of the closure of the business.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SK2242 (talk) 02:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]