User talk:Nordisk Plus

Welcome!

Hello Nordisk Plus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! User:Chongkian (talk) 07:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to San Juan, Metro Manila, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pension reform bill strikes

Hello, you've repeatedly added protest methods from Yellow vests protests to 2023 French pension reform strikes with the sources removed. Since France24 published numbers for Paris streetgoers from the Minister of the Interior showing 119,000 protestors to 1,500 rioters, I am removing this dubious equivalence with the yellow vests, and I have noted this on the talk page. Please follow policy regarding verifiability and do not add material that is likely to be challenged without sources. RAN1 (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RAN1 (talk) 23:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm HapHaxion. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Europe Now!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at DZBB-TV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, MEGOGO, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 10:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dark Oracle, you may be blocked from editing. Aspects (talk) 04:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RPC (TV Network) (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the information contained in this article is uncited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RPC (TV Network) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nordisk Plus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RPC (TV Network) (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add more sources before resubmitting. Unsourced statements should be removed entirely or fixed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RPC (TV Network) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar issues

Hey there. I notice that several of your edits contain incorrect grammar. May I ask what your native language is? We have Wikipedias in many languages. I can provide a link to one in your native language if you want. You would probably be able to edit more efficiently there. –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Camp Rock

added a link pointing to Family Channel

Camp Rock 2: The Final Jam

added a link pointing to Family Channel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Stop vandalising the List of mayday episodes page or you'll get banned Plane'n Boom1 (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RPC (TV Network) (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Third submission in a row with no changes. Entire paragraphs are unsourced. The slogans and list of programs are both unsourced and totally unnecessary. Not enough to demonstrate notability at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RPC (TV Network) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Screen Awards

Please stop adding fake nominations not even verified by the Academy themselves, let alone any third-party sources. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 02:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm 78.60.31.143. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, SkyShowtime, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 78.60.31.143 (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re ISDB-Tb edits

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 11:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why the Philippines got Digital TV equipment from Japan, which was introduced in 2003, describe as a reliable source? Nordisk Plus (talk) 07:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RPC (TV Network) (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

On Wikipedia, all stated facts should be supported by a citation to a reliable source. Currently, portions of this draft are unsourced - please add necessary citations before resubmitting. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RPC (TV Network) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 23:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sister cities in Metro Manila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at FanDuel Sports Network. Esolo5002 (talk) 00:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you blocked my user? Nordisk Plus (talk) 01:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have not been blocked, this is a warning. Stop changing Fan Duel Sports Network as owned by Fan Duel, it's simply not true. Esolo5002 (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]