User talk:Noles1984/Archive 3

CSS Tallahassee

Sorry for the delay! I've added it to the ship box-- a quick list of these is on my to-do page, which will let you be one click away from editing them.... plange 21:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1690/pilgrims userbox

Your user box says: "Noles1984 descendants were Pilgrims landing in Ipswich in 1690" Don't you mean ancestors? Or are you like 350 years old? :) Cburnett 23:22, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chalk Maple

Are you sure that's a Chalk Maple? IMO it looks more like a Red Maple (which also grows in that part of Florida). There are some pictures of the leaves here, and most of them look different from your picture. I may be wrong however - some of them do look rather similar to yours. --Schzmo 19:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if the bark looks like that, you probably are right. Do you know the flower color? If they're red, it's a Red Maple; if they're green/yellow, then it most likely is a Chalk Maple. --Schzmo 19:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to make the same note! The pic is unfortunately Red Maple, not Chalk Maple (which is very closely related to, and barely distinguishable from, Sugar Maple). As a PS - "Image compressed by 60% to save Wikipedia space" - this isn't necessary, space is not a problem, it is better to upload the full resolution. - MPF 21:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up ... saw the notes on Schzmo's talk page; on comparing the leaf shape with other photos, the character to look for is not how pointed the leaf is (this is variable), but how many serrations there are on the sides of the lobes; Chalk Maple (as in the Duke.edu pic) has just one or two teeth on the side, whereas Red Maple, and your scan, shows several small teeth. Sorry, it is definitely Red Maple! - MPF 21:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I reckon it is worth re-uploading the pic with a new name, as we don't have a decent Red Maple leaf pic (see commons:Acer rubrum, which is the best place to put pics so they can be used on all the other wikipedias as well) - MPF 21:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On pic size - generally, people with dial-up etc will only look at the thumbnails in the page; the full-size pic can be a megabyte or five without affecting this, so large image files aren't a problem (that's one of the nice things about wikipedia!) - MPF 22:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! - it does; if you click on a pic, unless the pic is small, you'll find the pic on the image description page is still reduced, with a clickable line under the pic which says "Download high resolution version (2848x2136, 1537 KB)" (or whatever the full size of the pic is). You can set yourself what size image the image description page shows; go to "my preferences" (link next to your talk page link), go to "Files", and there you'll be offered a drop-down box "Limit images on image description pages to:", with the default setting at 800×600px, but you can set it as low as 320×240px if you want to; this will allow you to see pics at a much lower resolution and kilobytage. Hope this helps! - MPF 20:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're the expert on Florida history...

...is there anything you'd change about Cascades Park (Tallahassee)? —Keenan Pepper 05:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good article. I added two images a postcard and a drawing for interest OK?... surely there needs to be an image for the upcoming rebirth. I also added one single line saying: "The Florida State Capital now stands where this waterfall and pond once were." As for being an expert? I'm really only interested in Leon Co. and surounding counties and towns. I just get curious about things and then look for photos at the Florida Photographic Collection then Google that subject or information within the description to see if I can get more. There's so much more to do. What else have you seen that I've created? I'd be interested. "Go Noles!" -Chuck, Noles1984 14:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the images. I asked my sister to take some photos with her digital camera, which should complement the historical images nicely. And you're definitely the expert; your contributions are ridiculously extensive, so don't even argue. =P —Keenan Pepper 15:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the quick image deletion

I presume you just re-uploaded it. Assuming the new information you provided is OK, there's no more problem. Non-comercial only images have been not allowed here for more than a year; it's more than time for us to stamp on them quickly... JesseW, the juggling janitor 19:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Newport, Florida

I'll tackle the Newport, Florida article today. From what I've seen, 3 seperate articles can come from this. Noles1984 12:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, thanks for your help. -- Beland 05:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Surficial Aquifer.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Surficial Aquifer.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tallahassee

I didn't copy it, I moved it. The previous location that it appeared at was in the main article space, which isn't the right place for something that's a sandbox. So I moved it to the Talk: namespace, but if you prefer, you can make this sort of stuff a subpage in your user namespace instead. --Michael Snow 16:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Goodall Environmental Middle School

Hello! You have restored the National Geographic video cover with Jane Goodall's picture on it i the article on Jane Goodall Environmental Middle School. Unfortunately this is directly against the fair use policy (see counterexaple # 9). Also, the copyright tag leaves no room for interpretation, saying "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of videotape covers to illustrate the videotape in question qualifies as fair use". I will remove the image again. Please don't put it back. Dr Zak 16:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of Doak Campbell Stadium

Hello, some time ago you upladed a couple of images of Doak Campbell Stadium from the Seminoles website. I have orphaned those as any local fan could go and take pictures of the stadium interior at a game. The {{promophoto}} tag specifically says that such pictures are only suitable "where the image is unrepeatable". Regards Dr Zak 17:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to new WikiProject

Sorry to disturb, but am wishing to take a moment of your time for something I hope will be of interest. I'd like to invite you to join a new WikiProject I've started, WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Should you feel so inclined, please feel free to join. And spread the word to any other interested parties. :) -Ebyabe 19:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Doak Campbell Stadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Doak Campbell Stadium.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ccwaters 19:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Star Metro01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Star Metro01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 22:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Star Metro01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Star Metro01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Chowbok ☠ 16:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commonwealth Cup (Virginia)

I nominated this article for deletion not because the content was bad, but because it was redundant to the Commonwealth Cup page. I moved a bit of the information over there, but enately they are the same. Jazznutuva 10:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominatng was a good move. I incorporated the style of info box or table found on previous Commonwealth page which I think looks cleaner, just my opinion. Adjusted the title color to white since it was somewhat hidden in the grey (black text). Moved the photo up.

Question do you know how the template for UVA (Commonwealth Cup) and Jefferson-Eppes Trophy article/page bottom) is done. That's a mystery and I'd like to create one for FSU. Thanks. Noles1984 16:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure... it took me a while to figure this out too... I actually created the UVA one... follow this link {{University of Virginia}}... to add this template to the page you just simply add {{University of Virginia}} to the bottom of the page but it's only a template. If you have any other questions check out Help:Template or write me back... I'll gone for a few days, but I'll answer as soon as I get back. Jazznutuva 22:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hills Parkway

The only information I have handy is that it's supposed to be a toll road between 319 in Bradfordville and 98 in Newport, it was in an article in the local paper early this year. They'd be a lot better off spending the money to, oh I dunno, widen 319 perhaps? - Aerobird 15:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note

If you set your e-mail address, I will e-mail you. Or, if you e-mail me, I will respond by e-mail. Johntex\^talk 23:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Breadbox buses

Yeah, I'm pretty sure the bus in this pic: [1] is what I'm thinking of. - Aerobird 00:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

native merge

Cool - thanks for that. I was beginning to wonder if anybody else was going to notice.....cheers Cas Liber 07:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Source of scanned material==

I have tagged Image:Longleaf Pine01.jpg as having no source listed. You indicated that you had scanned the image, but you do not say where you scanned it from. Scanning an image does not give you any copyright, and the copyright of the original image still applies. -- Donald Albury 03:28, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leon County roads

Well I've been rather wrapped up in WP:AIR activity lately, but I'll see what I can do. :-) - Aerobird ^{Target locked - Fox One!} 22:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did some work, whaddya think? Unfortunatly there's no .SVG yet for Florida State Road 366. - Aerobird ^{Target locked - Fox One!} 23:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you liked it. :-) Yeah, the B-70 shouldn't have been cancelled (insert not-at-all-NPOV rant about MacNamara here). As for the Dragonfly, it's included as part of the Cessna T-37 article. - Aerobird ^{Target locked - Fox One!} 14:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New NRHP Collaboration Division

Hey, saw you were a participant in the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject. I thought I would let you know that there is a new Collaboration Division up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to Good article standard or higher. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the division subpage. IvoShandor 11:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Doak_Campbell_Stadium_Diagram.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Doak_Campbell_Stadium_Diagram.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wawasee

I just wanted to thank you for your fine work on Lake Wawasee history. I am a relative new comer to the Lake. I found it 3 years ago after buying a pontoon boat. Though I can't afford to live on the lake I enjoy the history. I knew it had a rich history but never knew the details until I read the article. Thank you again! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.93.44.78 (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Florida Photographic Collection (FPC) images

Here's what happended: The FPC used a dubious copyright notice that made it sound like the FPC owned the copyright to the image. They don't necessarily. It was discussed here:Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_6#Template:Flphoto. I unfortunately had to agree with the reasoning to delete all of the images. I lost about 50 images. Royalbroil 14:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hmm, I hadn't known about that Florida stuff. This image, at any rate, should be okay to keep on fair use grounds, since according the article, it's from before the mansion was remodeled. I would simply delete that Florida boilerplate and just put a standard fair-use justification on there, adding that the house no longer exists in that form so the image cannot be replaced. That should satisfy BetacommandBot. —Chowbok ☠ 15:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assist needed

I'm still getting notices from User:BetacommandBot about rationale even though the below tag is placed on the image and discussion pages. Example: Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg. As you probably know, the Florida Memory Project template was discarded leaving many images either deleted or with notices.

Digital Image Information
This is a one of a kind unique digital image from The Florida Memory Project, Florida Department of State. It holds the archives' number of: 0000000. This image is needed to enhance and improve this article and no other representation exists.
Use: The use of photographs and other materials in the custody of the State Archives of Florida is governed by state law and, in some cases, by the terms of the donation agreement under which the Archives acquired the images. In accordance with the provisions of Section 257.35(6), Florida Statutes, "Any use or reproduction of material deposited with the Florida Photographic Collection shall be allowed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)(b) and subsection (4), provided that appropriate credit for its use is given." Please contact the Archives if you have any questions regarding the credit and use of any material.
Florida Department of State State Library and Archives of Florida 500 S. Bronough St. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 (850) 245-6700

Copyright Information

What can be done? Need help from an administator. Go Horns, no Gators need apply. Noles1984 15:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that BetacommandBot is just that — a bot — so it doesn't have the ability to recognize every permutation of a fair use rationale automatically. AmiDaniel's addition ought to work, though it's spelled "rationale," not "rational."

That aside, there are a lot of things wrong with the tagging on that image. The source isn't necessarily correct; the Florida Photographic Collection is simply an archive of many images. This does not mean that they own the copyright to the images. If you look at the photo with call number #fa2986, for example, you'll see that there's an author listed. He or she is the actual image source; not the Florida Photographic Collection.

Next, that's not a particularly strong fair use rationale in the first place. Before uploading fair use images, carefully read Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Policy; all ten of these must be met; not nine, not eight, but all ten. Then, go to Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline#Necessary components. Does you fair use rationale answer all of the questions (again, not some of the questions) in some detail? The phrase "needed to enhance and improve this article" is vague, and "no other representation exists" is sometimes questionable, so using this rationale as a blanket template for all Florida Photographic Collection images is a no-go.

We then come to the fair use tag itself. You've used the "unique historic image" tag, which as far as I can tell, is blatantly wrong. The subject of the image is unique and historic; the image itself isn't. This tag is misused more often than not, so let me explain. Image:The Falling Man.jpg is a "unique historic image;" most other photographs of the Sept. 11 attacks are not. Image:Photo 51.jpg is a "unique historic image;" most other DNA images from journals and the like are not. Image:Famousphotoche.jpg is a "unique historic image;" other non-free copyrighted photos of him are not. The image must be unique — not the subject — and we have to prove that it's unique; see my fair use rationale at Image:Kent State massacre.jpg.

Finally, there's one small remaining issue. The resolution of the image is quite high, which is unnecessary considering how its displayed in the corresponding article.

But, wait! Read the publication date of this photo more closely: "Publication info: ca. 1911." If the work is published before 1909, it is public domain in the U.S., but that's not helpful. However, if the work was published before 1923, it is in the public domain in the U.S., given that it wasn't an unpublished work. It is considered an unpublished work if it didn't have a copyright notice at that time, or if it was published through 1922 in a language other than English. Given that there's a publication date, it is certainly feasible that the image is in the public domain. But, we have the clause that all works published before 1978 go into the public domain 95 years after publication, which would be ca. 2006. I think it's reasonable to claim this image as in the public domain.

As a result, all of this fair use business (for this image only!) is unnecessary and can be removed. I would use the {{PD-US}} image tag, but do not forget that even though it's a free image, it must still be well-sourced.

What's wrong with the Gators? — Rebelguys2 ^talk 17:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

responded

Responded on my talk. BTW I'm not at FSU anymore, I'm now up in D.C. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 01:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

por que?

~~What do you mean by "know one can make you out"? That the image is too dark? If you meant I should delete the image entirely if I'm not suing it, I already am on my userpage.~~ VanTucky 22:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I tried it out on my userpage, I see what you mean. Thank you so much! VanTucky 23:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 15:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC) After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 15:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got your reply, thanks. Please note that you should still go to the discussion page in the link to state why you think the article should not be deleted. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 18:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:National_High_Magnetic_Field_Lab00.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:National_High_Magnetic_Field_Lab00.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetic field images

I replied on my talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Vfrench.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vfrench.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Janice Harsanyi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Janice Harsanyi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Addiction Foods

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Addiction Foods, by Nuttah68 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Addiction Foods seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Addiction Foods, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of By Nature

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on By Nature, by Nuttah68 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because By Nature seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting By Nature, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Fromm Family Foods

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Fromm Family Foods, by Nuttah68 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Fromm Family Foods seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Fromm Family Foods, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Notability is asserted through providing sources to verify that a company meets the guidelines for notability of companies. It is not a factor of the kinds of ingredients the company uses. None of the articles tagged for deletion have independent sources for any information. Leebo ^T/C 16:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk page. We can keep the discussion there if you want. One place is better than split, though. Leebo ^T/C 17:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dale_Mabry_Experimental_1946.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dale_Mabry_Experimental_1946.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Burt_Reynolds_pr07242.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Burt_Reynolds_pr07242.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell ^babelfish 03:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Lake Wawasee Sergents Hotel Location.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lake Wawasee Sergents Hotel Location.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Church San Luis.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Church San Luis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shell ^babelfish 18:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your 4400 edits

Why are you keeping the pics on some of the actors but not others? Ospinad 21:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The edit that I was refering to was the one of Conchita Campbell. You said, "I edited Conchita Campbell adding box (did not remove photo)" but that wasn't true. Maybe it was an honest mistake but as you can see from here and here your edit of "(modifiied info box)" removed the picture. It's ok though, I put it back. Ospinad 17:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Benjamin Chaires House.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Benjamin Chaires House.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell ^babelfish 19:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soffit

Hi Noles, not been to Wikipedia for a while, so missed your post. We typically have about 900 overhang on the eaves. 3ft, sometimes we go the 4ft. This to suit sheet sizes. We used to use eaves vents a lot, and then combined with roof ventilators they are great. For some reason they seem to be going out of fashion. The shot you posted with the level eaves and the shaped barge boards reminds me of what we used to do in England. Sadly we don't see it much here in Northern Australia. Cheers, Keep up the good work. billbeee 08:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Old Mother Hubbard product.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Old Mother Hubbard product.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:FSU Womens logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:FSU Womens logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Pinnacle Foods logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Pinnacle Foods logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Diamond Pet Foods.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Diamond Pet Foods.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationales

Hi, thanks for your comment about the Florida Photographic Collection, unfortunately I have been off-wiki for some time. Are you still having problems with fair use issues cropping up? It seems likely that many of the FPC images are actually PD but just require identifying as such. Is there a systematic process going on of weeding through them all that needs some volunteers? Contacting an admin does sound like a good idea. Purgatorio 14:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's good that that sounds under control. Were all of the images really unique? I guess it's possible that some of the less old images may be merely difficult to replace, rather than impossible, so might slip through the fair use provision? Purgatorio 14:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. It's a shame that so many Wikipedians are young! Having an "oldies drive" and a mass-scanning of volunteers' old photos might produce some real gems. But on the whole it is difficult to see how freely licensed images can be obtained from that period. Glad you've sorted out what you can, though. Purgatorio 15:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addiction foods

To be honest I still think that it reads like an advertisement, but a little more covertly. I have no problem in people deleting it. It still needs a major overall to make it respect the enclyopedia like tone that Wikipedia strives for. However at this point is a whole lot better than what it was.

Kind regards

SimonHarvey 04:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

Kinhega project/Red Hills

I'm very interested in the maps for the Red Hills plantations and Quail plantations in the north part of Leon county & wondered f you'd be willing to help me? Please e-mail me if you are willing: karenaviva@hotmail.com

Thanks in advance, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karenaviva (talk • contribs) 19:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FSU Womens logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:FSU Womens logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nole's Page

The Women's logo i know is retired, i didnt want to delete it, i received a message from a bot that says there is no copyright information on it and that it will be removed from the server.

as i wrote in the talk page i was hoping to start an overhaul and a cleanup of all the pages. the info boxes are nice but are unfortunately tacky. i am making graphics in CS3 that will have the same information with a better look to it.

I appreciate your help, I am also starting a Wikiproject: Florida State to help improve all of our pages and could use your help —Preceding unsigned comment added by UkrNole 485 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The GoodLife Recipe.png

Thanks for uploading Image:The GoodLife Recipe.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missy Francis.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Missy Francis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leon County Test Ballot Tape.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Leon County Test Ballot Tape.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Joseph Chaires Grave01.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Joseph Chaires Grave01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell ^babelfish 07:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1966 Atlantic hurricane season map.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1966 Atlantic hurricane season map.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 09:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rosewood_Florida_rc12409.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Rosewood_Florida_rc12409.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fred-J 20:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Solid Gold Pet Products.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Solid Gold Pet Products.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Grove Plantation pt00285.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Grove Plantation pt00285.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Grove Plantation sl819c.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Grove Plantation sl819c.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Grove Plantation pt00285.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Grove Plantation pt00285.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Grove Plantation sl819c.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Grove Plantation sl819c.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Solid Gold Pet Products.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Solid Gold Pet Products.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Grove Plantation sl819c.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Grove Plantation sl819c.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dean Butler 02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dean Butler 02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FSU Womens logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:FSU Womens logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chaires High School rc05542.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chaires High School rc05542.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chaires High School2 rc05541.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chaires High School2 rc05541.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Autocar truck logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Autocar truck logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Accu-Vote Memory Card.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Accu-Vote Memory Card.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Capital Regional Medical Center logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Capital Regional Medical Center logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Diamond Pet Foods.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Diamond Pet Foods.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Artemis product.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Artemis product.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Accu-Vote Memory Card.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Accu-Vote Memory Card.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dean Butler 02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dean Butler 02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dean Butler 2007 actor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dean Butler 2007 actor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Artemis product.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Artemis product.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Force Protection Cougar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Force Protection Cougar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Force Protection logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Force Protection logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use rationale

I've added the FUR for you. See here. - Rjd0060 15:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Natural Balance logo 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Natural Balance logo 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Natural Balance logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Natural Balance logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LeRoy Collins sl148.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LeRoy Collins sl148.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mary Call Darby Collins gv005161.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mary Call Darby Collins gv005161.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Orchard Pond Plantation rc24108.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Orchard Pond Plantation rc24108.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Congratulations! Your image Image:Tallahassee Capitol Complex pr11224.jpg was the random picture of the day for November 12, 2007. It looked like this:

. Again, Congratulations! - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 20:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Palm Beach Gardens logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Palm Beach Gardens logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret de Stafford

Hi Noles1984, just curious how or where do find the reference source: "Richard Glanville-Brown, correspondence, Richard Glanville-Brown (RR 2, Milton, Ontario, Canada), August 17, 2005." Daytrivia (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Whistle Stop, Alabama

Whistle Stop, Alabama, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Whistle Stop, Alabama satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whistle Stop, Alabama and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Whistle Stop, Alabama during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 04:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WCOT-Tallahassee.png

Thanks for uploading Image:WCOT-Tallahassee.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mary Call Darby Collins gv005161.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mary Call Darby Collins gv005161.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]