User talk:NoahRiffe

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article The Daily Collegian.

Welcome!

Hello, NoahRiffe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jared Mayden, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jared Mayden

The article Jared Mayden has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to Sachse High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Playing college ball is not notable. Neither is simply being drafted by a pro team. Meters (talk) 02:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

conflict of interest

I believe you have a conflict of interest with Daily Collegian per your post at the Teahouse. I would suggest you take a look at Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. All the best, {{u|wylie39}} {Talk} 01:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wylie39: Hello, totally fair! I just have been digging into the history. Happy to have people verify, I have cited everything heavily, The biggest thing is I have lots of knowledge as well as access to historical documents. Not sure how to do that. Am I not allowed to keep editing? I am a journalist so I am not new to conflict of interest, I feel it has been written objectively. Thank you for your help as I am new to this scene.

@Wylie39: Second reply here, I don't currently work at the paper. But I am a student at the school still and do respect what they do.

I would make sure to cite everything and Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#How_to_disclose_a_COI. If you make any controversial changes I would get consensus form other editors.

@Wylie39: Thanks! is there a good way to find other editors that may be able to review the page and check my work?

The Teahouse and Help desk will be happy to help. Also the article talkpage {{u|wylie39}} {Talk} 02:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snoqualmie Valley Record (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the references are to the newspaper. Others are unreliable sources. A separate article on the newspaper may be in order. If so, this draft should be revised with better sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snoqualmie Valley Record and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Snoqualmie Valley Record, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NoahRiffe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daily Collegian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hindenburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snoqualmie Valley Record (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SounderBruce was:

This submission needs major cleanup to meet MOS standards, namely being rewritten without its timeline prose.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snoqualmie Valley Record and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Snoqualmie Valley Record, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sounder Bruce 20:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffrey Field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi NoahRiffe! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Snoqualmie Valley Record, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aaron Molloy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Molloy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Molloy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SK2242 (talk) 23:44, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snoqualmie Valley Record (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft has been resubmitted repeatedly, but the issues identified by the reviewers have not been addressed, in particular having to do with independent sources. The reviewers will not waste their time evaluating whether this draft satisfies newspaper notability guidelines until it appears that the submitter is addressing the concerns of the reviewers. You may request advice at the Teahouse. If this draft is resubmitted without first requesting advice, it may be nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snoqualmie Valley Record and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Snoqualmie Valley Record, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Snowqualmie paper

Hello! I saw your post at the Teahouse. I added a source to the draft. I was wondering, did you happen to copy any material directly from another source? One of the items I found in google books was an exact match for a sentence in the article text. Not a huge deal, as it was only a sentence, but if you have copied other material please into the draft let us know. Thanks. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ThatMontrealIP I believe it was the single sentence, I made sure to rewrite and copy edit to make it non copyright infringing.

It was a direct match, word for word, so please be careful in future. The article is now published!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Snoqualmie Valley Record Logo 2020.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snoqualmie Valley Record Logo 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 21:23, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi NoahRiffe! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with submission, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Snoqualmie Valley Record Logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snoqualmie Valley Record Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Jeffrey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This doesn't show notability outside the school.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:New Beaver Field.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:New Beaver Field.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 23:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ken Hosterman has been accepted

Ken Hosterman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hack (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Defense and Forward.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer

Hello! Your submission of Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MSG17 (talk) 14:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer

The article Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 21:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer

The article Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian

Hello, NoahRiffe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Park Avenue Army for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Park Avenue Army is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park Avenue Army until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BTN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1913 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1913 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1913 Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American men's college soccer teams 1913 season

A tag has been placed on Category:American men's college soccer teams 1913 season indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian

Hello, NoahRiffe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Editor-in-Chiefs of The Daily Collegian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 08:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Park Avenue Army Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Park Avenue Army Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Penn State Nittany Lions women's soccer

I happened to stumble across this article recently. I don't think it gets said enough around here, but really well done. I can tell the time and effort you've put into the article and it shows. GauchoDude (talk) 19:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Penn State Men's Soccer vs Tehran Booters.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Penn State Men's Soccer vs Tehran Booters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Penn State Nittany Lions wrestling, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Taylor and Kerry McCoy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Penn State Nittany Lions wrestling National Champions

Hello, NoahRiffe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Penn State Nittany Lions wrestling National Champions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Penn State Nittany Lions wrestling National Champions

Hello, NoahRiffe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Penn State Nittany Lions wrestling National Champions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enrique Meneses (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Enrique Meneses instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enrique Meneses and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Beaver Field.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Beaver Field.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Old Beaver Field, Grandstand, Practice.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old Beaver Field, Grandstand, Practice.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]