User talk:Nipman

May 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Nipun Malhotra, from its old location at User:Nipman/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nipun Malhotra (social entrepreneur) (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nipun Malhotra (social entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nipun Malhotra (social entrepreneur), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nipman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nipman! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Requesting help to see if the 2nd draft of my article meets the WP:NPOV and WP:TONE criteria before I resubmit it, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nipun Malhotra (social entrepreneur) has been accepted

Nipun Malhotra (social entrepreneur), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 14:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello Nipman. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Nipun Malhotra (social entrepreneur), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nipman. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nipman|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I note that your user name and the gentleman's foundation are the same Fiddle Faddle 11:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Faddle, With due respect, I'd like to share that I am not being compensated directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever for this page or the edits. Neither do I expect to have any financial stake involved in this in the future. I had chosen this user name when I had started working on my first page. If that is the concern, I will change my username as per the Wikipedia guidelines. Also, in case my language seems promotional, I am willing to change it. Just to give you a background, my interest in disability as a topic comes from my personal family experience and I have been following some of the disability activists and their inspiring work since a very long time now. During the lockdown, I decided to write my first Wikipedia article on Nipun Malhotra as I found his work to be notable. Plus, it was a topic that had not been touched upon on Wikipedia. I added Project Delhi and Wheels for Life as I learnt about it during the Covid situation. I wish to explore more and write on several other topics of my interest that are not on Wikipedia yet. However, since this is my first article, I am not ashamed in admitting that I'm learning every day and there's a lot to learn honestly. :) Also, I just re-looked at it and I think if we remove Wheels for Life, there will be just one change i.e. Project Delhi which wouldn't be an unfair addition.

Thank you. That declaration meets Wikipedia's needs. We are very careful in case we are invaded by commercial editors. I am sure this felt like an unjust accusation to you, and I apologise for that issue. Even so we have to issue these firmly worded requests.

Your username is fine. It was simply a coincidence. Fiddle Faddle 11:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to apologize. I understand your concern. I'm sure I'll get better with time. Thank you! Nipman (talk) 05:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]