User talk:Macbflo

NeuroproteXeon, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NeuroproteXeon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the advice there. Also, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest if you are connected with the product. Dbfirs 19:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neuroprotexeon (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

Needs a cleanup before it gets accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neuroprotexeon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi NeuroproteXeon! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:57, Friday, February 26, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Editing with a conflict of interest

Hello, NeuroproteXeon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Largoplazo- I think I've begun to rectify the COI issues, I mistakenly made my username the name of the project without realizing it would appear a conflict. I have changed my username. In an attempt to rectify notability concerns I've begun adding references or links, but have gotten suggestions to possilby rethink the article title/ focus to highlight the research which is more well documented than the company. Is it possible to remove some of the problems listed that I rectified? and remove recommendation for deletion if I am working on reorganizing possibly renaming? NeuroproteXeon (talk) 00:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neuroprotexeon

The article Neuroprotexeon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't see evidence that this company meets the notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Largoplazo- Am working on links/references. Would you suggest an alternate way to present the contents that might work better.

NeuroproteXeon (talk) 22:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macbflo (talk • contribs) [reply]

Rework of article

I'm still puzzled about your connection with the company or their product, but I'm assuming good faith. To keep the article, you need to find publications independent of the company where they have written about the company or treatment. If you can't find reliable sources for the company, then perhaps you can for the treatment? Dbfirs 22:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dbfirs- I am not sure based on the guidelines if I have coi. I've read guidlines and see that coi should be noted, but I'm not sure i have one or how I might notate. I don't work for the company- learned about it through friends and am intrigued by its concept/ local company in my town. I did some research and offered to try to summarize the work in a wikipedia page because I believe it's a good cause and company in my hometown and information about the concept is not readily or easily accessible. (Not much published on company as of yet.) (Believe I am neutrally representing content, but not sure if I might need to rethink how I organize the article.) Maybe it's about xenon as anesthetic with company as footnote? Or simply find a way to note coi.? Thanks for any suggestions. NeuroproteXeon (talk) 22:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macbflo (talk • contribs) [reply]

Thank you for clarifying that you do not have a conflict of interest. If you cannot find independent published reports about the company, then you might have to allow the article to be deleted, but I think you can probably find sufficient citations for an article about the treatment. This would need a fresh start, but you can use some of the same material. You might like to copy some deleted text (use the history and click on a version) to your sandbox or to your own computer before it gets deleted.

By the way, just use four tildes ~~~~ to sign your name and timestamp. Dbfirs 23:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, a couple more questions... :) thanks for help so far! I am finding external links, but not 'reports'-not sure exactly what that would include. I'll upload the links I'm finding and see if they help with the problems. Does it get rechecked? Not sure if I can remove some of the problems. I think I fixed one by changing my very suspicious username. :) I've done a lot of reading and research- I hope I can find a way to get it out there. But a lot of this is very foreign to me. But you're saying if I change the topic/ name to something relating to the research it may work and some of what I've got can be used.(I think)NeuroproteXeon (talk) 23:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macbflo (talk • contribs) [reply]

By "reports" I meant newspaper articles or medical journals or similar respected publications. Parent company websites are not helpful. Dbfirs 23:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thank youNeuroproteXeon (talk) 23:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macbflo (talk • contribs) [reply]

If your real interest is in writing about xenon's use in anesthesia, are you aware that there is already coverage of this at Xenon#Anesthesia? You could simply expand that section with additional information. If you have considerable more to write about it, you could compose a free-standing article about it, to which the Anesthesia section of the Xenon article could then be topped with a {{main article}} link. Either way, the information needs to be previous published in reliable sources, and shouldn't place undue emphasis on the one company. (Even if it's the only company involved in research, the focus should be on the research, not the company.) This isn't a place for original reporting of research findings or strategies. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Largoplazo- Thank you, I appreciate the help. I did review the information on anethesia in the xenon article. Was hoping to highlight information that isn't buried in the gas's page and also highlight the local company that is making strides in my community, but think I will inevitably go the route you suggested, focusing on the research and linking in the xenon pages as well as others. NeuroproteXeon (talk) 03:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macbflo (talk • contribs) [reply]

Nomination of Neuroprotexeon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neuroprotexeon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuroprotexeon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Neuroprotexeon

Hello, Macbflo. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Neuroprotexeon".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]