User talk:Nettings

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Nettings}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your recent contributions to the JACK Audio Connection Kit article! SoCalDonF (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! My first barnstar :) Thanks!

Archiving a Talk page

Please read Help:Archiving a talk page. (If you wish to respond, please do so here.) HairyWombat 01:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, nice work! I didn't know about those handy indexing macros. Thanks for cleaning it up!Nettings (talk) 12:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 12:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Werieth, our messages have crossed. Suggest to continue on your talk page! Nettings (talk) 12:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You could simply upload it to Commons. Commons is very relaxed (per US case law and the "Best Western" test) about trademarked logos and what is considered to be "too simple" to be protected. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He already tried that, the file is 100% copyrighted and well beyond TOO. Werieth (talk) 13:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Batman

Thanks for your input Nettings, it really does mean a lot as I feel like I am taking crazy pills faced with the complete obstructionism to video of any kind. It doesn't fail NFCC and I don't know how to get it delisted from deletion discussion because of that unfortunately. But your input in that discussion is very much appreciated. Thanks again. DWB (talk) / Comment on Dredd's FA nom! 16:34, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ambisonic Logo

I was going more for geometric elegance and simplicity (using the "even-odd fill" algorithm), rather than absolute minimum filesize, but I don't see why the file couldn't be further edited to create derivative works... AnonMoos (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it could be edited, but it's not as neatly separated into objects any more. Your version is almost like compiled code :) But then, the old version remains available for anyone who needs it, so no problem there. Best, --Nettings (talk) 09:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Ambisonic Source Texts

The article List of Ambisonic Source Texts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RadioFan, I don't really disagree with your concerns about this page - it's currently more of a public scratchpad of content that used to clutter the main Ambisonics article. I moved it to its own page to make the main page more concise, and didn't delete it altogether because there is some valuable content here and somebody obviously spent some effort to collect it - it deserves to be cherry-picked. As you see, the whole topic of Category:Ambisonics is currently undergoing a major rewrite, and as soon as I can find some time again and some of the more pressing issues on the other pages are dealt with, I will see to it that this little orphan is taken care of. Until then, I'd like to ask for the page to stay as-is. If you or somebody else is really uncomfortable with its continued existence, I could move the content to my user pages, but I try to avoid that because it might irritate other contributors... Nettings (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The main wikispace is not appropriate for scratch pads. Please consider moving it under User:Nettings/List of Ambisonic Source Texts, it will still be editable by anyone who knows its there. This will make it clearer that the list not ready for prime time.--RadioFan (talk) 17:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Ambisonic Productions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ambisonic Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ambisonic Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GamerPro64 23:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Ambisonic Source Texts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ambisonic Source Texts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ambisonic Source Texts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nettings. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nettings. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nettings. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Ambisonic software for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ambisonic software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ambisonic software until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:50, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Sound Logo project

The Wikimedia Sound Logo project

Hello, the Wikimedia sound logo project is in an early development phase -- this stage is for asking all kinds of questions, developing and fielding ideas, finding themes and shaping the direction of the project. Here is a link to the meta page for the project: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Sound_Logo

Your input is welcome. Thank you.

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]